Mantle neon illuminates Earth's formation

Mantle neon illuminates Earth's formation
Artist's impression of a young star surrounded by a protoplanetary disk in which planets are forming. Based on measures of neon isotopes, UC Davis researchers conclude that the Earth formed relatively quickly from this cloud of dust and gas, collecting water, carbon and nitrogen in the deep Earth. Credit: European Southern Observatory

The Earth formed relatively quickly from the cloud of dust and gas around the Sun, trapping water and gases in the planet's mantle, according to research published Dec. 5 in the journal Nature. Apart from settling Earth's origins, the work could help in identifying extrasolar systems that could support habitable planets.

Drawing on data from the depths of the Earth to , University of California Davis Professor Sujoy Mukhopadhyay and postdoctoral researcher Curtis Williams used isotopes to show how the planet formed.

"We're trying to understand where and how the neon in Earth's mantle was acquired, which tells us how fast the planet formed and in what conditions," Williams said.

Neon is actually a stand-in for where gases such as water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen came from, Williams said. Unlike these compounds that are essential for life, neon is an inert noble gas, and it isn't influenced by chemical and biological processes.

"So neon keeps a memory of where it came from even after four and a half billion years," Mukhopadhyay said.

There are three competing ideas about how the Earth formed from a protoplanetary disk of dust and gas over four billion years ago and how water and other gases were delivered to the growing Earth. In the first, the planet grew relatively quickly over two to five million years and captured gas from the nebula, the swirling cloud of dust and gas surrounding the young Sun. The second theory suggests dust particles formed and were irradiated by the Sun for some time before condensing into miniature objects called planetesimals that were subsequently delivered to the growing planet. In the third option, the Earth formed relatively slowly and gases were delivered by carbonaceous chondrite meteorites that are rich in water, carbon and nitrogen.

These different models have consequences for what the early Earth was like, Mukhopadhyay said. If the Earth formed quickly out of the , it would have had a lot of hydrogen gas at or near the surface. But if the Earth formed from carbonaceous chondrites, its hydrogen would have come in the more oxidized form, water.

Neon from ocean floor to deep space

To figure out which of the three competing ideas on planet formation and delivery of gases were correct, Williams and Mukhopadhyay accurately measured the ratios of neon isotopes that were trapped in the Earth's mantle when the planet formed. Neon has three isotopes, neon-20, 21 and 22. All three are stable and non-radioactive, but neon-21 is formed by radioactive decay of uranium. So the amounts of neon-20 and 22 in the Earth have been stable since the planet formed and will remain so forever, but neon-21 slowly accumulates over time. The three scenarios for Earth's formation are predicted to have different ratios of neon-20 to neon-22.

The closest they could get to the mantle was to look at rocks called pillow basalts on the ocean floor. These glassy rocks are the remains of flows from deep in the Earth that spilled out and cooled in the ocean, later to be collected by a drilling expedition led by the University of Rhode Island, which makes its collection available to other scientists.

The gases are found in tiny bubbles within the basalt. Using a press, Williams cracked basalt chips in a sealed chamber, allowing the gases to flow into a sensitive mass spectrometer.

Now for the space part. Previous researchers established the neon isotope ratio for the "solar nebula" (early rapid formation) model with data from the Genesis mission, which captured particles of the solar wind. Data for the "irradiated particles" model came from analyses of lunar soils and of meteorites. Finally, carbonaceous chondrite meteorites provided data for the "late accretion" model.

Minimum size for a habitable planet

The isotope ratios they found were well above those for the "irradiated particles" or "late accretion" models, Williams said, and support rapid early formation.

"This is a clear indication that there is nebular neon in the deep mantle," Williams said.

Neon, remember, is a marker for those other volatile compounds. Hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen would have been condensing into the Earth at the same time—all ingredients that, as far as we know, go into making up a habitable planet.

The results imply that to absorb these vital compounds, a planet must reach a certain size—the size of Mars or a little larger—before the solar nebula dissipates. Observations of other solar systems show that this takes about two to three million years, Williams said.

Does the same process happen around other stars? Observations from the Atacama Large Millimeter Array, or ALMA, observatory in Chile suggest that it does, the researchers said.

ALMA uses an array of 66 radiotelescopes working as a single instrument to image dust and gas in the universe. It can see the planet-forming disks of dust and gas around some nearby stars. In some cases, there are dark bands in those disks where dust has been depleted.

"There are a couple of ways dust could be depleted from the disk, and one of them is that they are forming planets," Williams said.

"We can observe planet formation in a gas disk in other solar systems, and there is a similar record of our own solar system preserved in Earth's interior," Mukhopadhyay said. "This might be a common way for to form elsewhere."

Explore further

Plate tectonics may have been active on Earth since the very beginning

More information: Curtis D. Williams et al, Capture of nebular gases during Earth's accretion is preserved in deep-mantle neon, Nature (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0771-1
Journal information: Nature

Provided by UC Davis
Citation: Mantle neon illuminates Earth's formation (2018, December 5) retrieved 18 July 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 06, 2018
Have they factored in the 'Big Splat' that seems to have formed the Moon ??

Dec 06, 2018
Have they factored in the 'Big Splat' that seems to have formed the Moon ??

Good question!

Mass wise the (planetesimal) last impactor contributed 10 % of final Earth mass, so that in itself could not have been dominating (and in the accretion "planetesimal delivery" scenario it is just another impactor).

IIRC someone looked on He3/Ne22 and saw that a number of lava oceans from impacts would erase the info on D/H water origins, else they found that it was the planetesimal delivery that looked good. So maybe there was enough impacts leading up to the last biggie to erase the "looks like planetesimal hydrogen caused water" info and making this disk gas capture dominating instead.?

Dec 06, 2018
From the abstract:

"Our observations also indicate distinct 20Ne/22Ne ratios between deep mantle plumes and mid-ocean-ridge basalts, which is best explained by addition of a chondritic component to the shallower mantle during the main phase of Earth's accretion and by subsequent recycling of seawater-derived neon in plate tectonic processes."

So some water (and other volatiles) would come from the tail of the bombardment which became dominated by KBOs from the outer system. I believe I just saw an (iffy, remote spectra) investigation that D/H ratio (so indicating water source) could be the same out to and including the moons of Saturn (except the likely captured Centaur Phoebe). Also consistent with mostly disk water, then some inner system injected KBO Centaurs as Neptune moved out to its current location.

New problem, classic disk models do not predict that. But they have problem with placing so many exoplanets so far out too, so ... "need more data/models".

Dec 06, 2018
Disregard the later disk D/H discussion, that article was and remain pulled by the publisher: , https://www.scien...a%3Dihub .

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more