Austerity results in 'social murder' according to new research

December 19, 2018, Lancaster University

The consequence of austerity in the social security system—severe cuts to benefits and the 'ratcheting up' of conditions attached to benefits—is 'social murder', according to new research by Lancaster University.

Dr. Chris Grover, who heads the University's Sociology Department, says austerity can be understood as a form of structural , violence that is built into society and is expressed in unequal power and unequal life chances, as it is deepens inequalities and injustices, and creates even more poverty.

The article, 'Violent proletarianisation: social murder, the reserve army of labour and social security 'austerity' in Britain', suggests that as a result of the violence of austerity working class people face harm to their physical and mental wellbeing and in some instances are 'socially murdered'.

Dr. Grover uses the article to call on the Government for change and action.

He refers to the process as 'violent proletarianisation' (the idea that violent austerity is aimed at forcing people to do paid , rather than being reliant upon benefits).

"To address violent proletarianisation what is required is not the tweaking of existing policies but that removes the economic need for people to work for the lowest wages that employers can get away with paying," says Dr. Grover.

Published in the journal, Critical Social Policy, Dr. Grover gives examples of where social security austerity has led to a range of harms:

  • an additional six suicides for every 10,000 work capability assessments done;
  • increasing number of people Britain dying of malnutrition
  • increasing numbers of homeless people dying on the streets or in hostels

The article argues that austerity, the difficult economic conditions created by Government by cutting back on public spending, has brought cuts and damaging changes to social security meaning Britain has fallen victim to a brutal approach to forcing people to do low paid work.

"The violence takes two forms," says Dr. Grover. "First it involves further economic hardship of already income-poor people.

"It causes social inequalities and injustices in the short term and, in the longer term.

"Second, the poverty that violent proletarianisation creates is both known and avoidable."

Dr. Grover adds that only by fundamentally rethinking current social policy can change that protects the poorest people be made.

Explore further: Knife crime and homicide figures reveal the violence of austerity

More information: Chris Grover, Violent proletarianisation: Social murder, the reserve army of labour and social security 'austerity' in Britain, Critical Social Policy (2018). DOI: 10.1177/0261018318816932

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Archaeologists discover Incan tomb in Peru

February 16, 2019

Peruvian archaeologists discovered an Incan tomb in the north of the country where an elite member of the pre-Columbian empire was buried, one of the investigators announced Friday.

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...

What rising seas mean for local economies

February 15, 2019

Impacts from climate change are not always easy to see. But for many local businesses in coastal communities across the United States, the evidence is right outside their doors—or in their parking lots.

The friendly extortioner takes it all

February 15, 2019

Cooperating with other people makes many things easier. However, competition is also a characteristic aspect of our society. In their struggle for contracts and positions, people have to be more successful than their competitors ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 19, 2018
How dare you question the motives of the rich. They deserve everything.
Poor people bring this on them selves by choosing to be poor. Just ask rich people.
3 / 5 (2) Dec 20, 2018
And so you would much prefer the rich to become poor also, because it isn't fair to the poor to have anyone who is better off and wealthier than the poor - especially those poor who are getting welfare checks for doing nothing in the way of working at a job?
Sure, let EVERYBODY be poor equally. That should show those rich who's the REAL boss.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.