Surface science concepts are up for revision

Surface science concepts are up for revision
Liquid droplets occupy a limited spot on the microtextured surface, consistent with omniphobicity. However, when immersion, the liquid can access the entire surface from the sides and at localized defects, which causes immediate submersion.Reproduced with permission from reference one. Credit: Elsevier; Xavier Pita

The textbook directions for characterizing the wetting properties of solid surfaces are likely to change as KAUST researchers demonstrate that conventional tests can be misleading.

Current go-to methods to determine surface wetting characteristics rely on measuring contact angles, whereby images of advancing and retracting droplets dispensed by capillaries onto surfaces are analyzed to estimate angles at solid-liquid-vapor interfaces.

A exceeding 90 degrees for water- or oil-based droplets indicates surfaces are hydrophobic (water repelling) or oleophobic (resistant to oil). Therefore, surfaces that meet this criterion for both water and oils are defined as omniphobic. High contact angles also ensure that, when immersed in , surfaces entrap air, which is crucial for applications, such as desalination, drag reduction in transport pipes and antifouling materials for ships.

Contact angles have proven extremely reliable for assessing the omniphobicity of surfaces that exploit liquid-repellent chemical coatings. Commercially available equipment and software exist for measuring real-time contact angles. However, in exploring coating-free approaches to repel liquids, Himanshu Mishra's team found that assessments based only on contact angles can be deceptive.

To demonstrate this discrepancy, the researchers investigated the wetting of silica surfaces comprising microscopic mushroom-shaped pillars (see image) by both contact-angle measurements and by immersion. When assessed by contact angle, the surfaces exhibited advancing and receding angles greater than 150 degrees, which according to the index used to evaluate surfaces classifies them as having remarkable liquid repellence or superomniphobicity. However, when assessed by immersion, the same liquids instantaneously imbibed the microtexture and thephobicitywas lost. Thus, surfaces that were characterized as superhydrophobic through led to flawed conclusions. In reality, localized defects, such as broken or missing pillars, in this microtexture and boundary enabled the liquid to penetrate and displace the trapped air.

Using the same material, the also demonstrated that if a wall was built around the pillar arrays, the resulting compartmentalized microtexture repelled liquid droplets in air and trapped air robustly on immersion. "As we identify new coating-free approaches to liquid repellence, the old criteria for assessing omniphobicity need to be updated, and the specificity of microtextures has to be recognized," said Mishra.

First author Sankara Arunachalam says, "During contact-angle measurements, the occupy a limited number of spots on the surface. Therefore, effects of surface defects might be missed."

However, the liquid can access the entire upon immersion. These findings are expected to advance the rational development of coating-free liquid-repellent surfaces as green and robust alternatives to current chemical treatments for applications, such as desalination and drag reduction.

Explore further

Bio-inspired materials decrease drag for liquids

More information: Sankara Arunachalam et al. Assessing omniphobicity by immersion, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.059
Citation: Surface science concepts are up for revision (2018, November 26) retrieved 24 May 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more