An international team of researchers, members of the Cross-Linguistic Data Formats Initiative (CLDF) led by the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, has proposed new guidelines on cross-linguistic data formats in order to facilitate sharing and data comparisons between the growing number of large linguistic databases worldwide. This format provides a software package, a basic ontology and usage examples.
There is an increasing number of linguistic databases worldwide, raising the possibility of a vast network for potential comparative studies. However, these databases are generally created independently of each other, and often have a unique and narrow focus. This means that the formats used for encoding the data are often different, creating difficulties in comparing data across databases.
The Cross-Linguistic Data Formats Initiative (CLDF) is an effort to resolve these issues. In a paper published in Scientific Data, the CLDF sets out proposed guidelines for a standardized format for linguistic databases, and also supplies a software package, a basic ontology and usage examples of best practices. The goal of this effort is to facilitate sharing and re-use of data in comparative linguistics.
The CLDF provides a data model underlying its recommendations that aims to be simple, yet expressive, and is based on the data model previously developed for the Cross-Linguistic Data project. This model has four main entities: (a) languages; (b) parameters; (c) values; and (d) sources. In the model, each value is related to a parameter and a language, and can be based on multiple sources. There are additionally references for sources, and references can also have contexts (which, for example, for printed references would be page numbers).
The CLDF data model is a package format in which a dataset would be made up of a set of data files containing tables, and a descriptive file that defines the relationships between the tables. Each linguistic data type would have a CLDF module and additional components, which would be the aspects of the data in the module that recur across multiple data types. The CLDF modules would also contain terms from the CLDF ontology. The ontology is a list of vocabulary that represents objects and properties with well-known semantics in comparative linguistics. This makes it possible for users to reference these terms in a uniform way.
A software package to enable validation and manipulation
The CLDF specifications use common file formats—such as CSV, JSON and BibTeX—that are widely supported, with the goal that these files can easily be read and written on many platforms. Even more importantly, the standardized format will allow researchers without programming skills to access and manipulate the data with preexisting tools, to avoid restricting the package only to researchers with sufficient programming skills to create their own tools. To facilitate this, the CLDF has created a "cookbook" repository for scripts for use with the CLDF specifications.
"We want to bring access to these data and the ability to compare them to as many researchers as possible," says Johann-Mattis List of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Robert Forkel, one of the driving forces behind the CLDF initiative, also notes that the CLDF format is not limited to linguistic data alone, but can also incorporate databases of cultural and geographic data, for example. "CLDF may drastically facilitate the testing of questions regarding the interaction between linguistic, cultural, and environmental factors in linguistic and cultural evolution."
Explore further: Knowledge of African-American language and culture benefits teachers in STEM fields
Cross-Linguistic Data Formats, advancing data sharing and re-use in comparative linguistics , Scientific Data, DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.205