Trump supporters on campuses more likely to show prejudice toward international students: study

August 29, 2018 by Bert Gambini, University at Buffalo

International students at American colleges and universities do not always find a welcoming environment. Research has shown that, as a group, internationals face prejudice from segments of the domestic student population, and a new study by a University at Buffalo psychologist suggests that stereotypes alone do not lead to that prejudice.

"Prejudice against international students is multifaceted," says Wendy Quinton, Ph.D., a clinical associate professor in UB's psychology department and author of the paper published in the Journal of Diversity in Higher Education.

"But there are factors leading to prejudice that universities can influence."

Her study showed that, aside from stereotypes, other factors, including support for President Donald Trump, predicted prejudice against international students from the domestic population.

"Some of President Trump's policies, such as promoting 'America First,' the travel ban and his talk of building a wall are in line with unwelcoming attitudes toward immigrants—but this is the first evidence I've seen linking support for Trump with attitudes toward international students," says Quinton, an expert in prejudice, stigma and social identity who surveyed 389 college students, all of whom self-identified as being born and raised in the United States.

"This finding tells us that if you statistically account for stereotypes, those domestic students who were higher in Trump support still had significantly higher prejudice. Liking Trump goes beyond stereotypes in predicting prejudice against international students."

Stereotypes are ideas or beliefs about members of a certain group. A can be positive or negative. Prejudice is a negative attitude toward members of a particular group. Stereotypes can lead to prejudice and Quinton says there are stereotypes that predict prejudice against international students.

"I found other factors, not just stereotypes—and administrators may be able to influence those factors and make a difference," she says.

In addition to Trump support, university identity emerged as another of prejudice.

University identity is reflected in a sense of belonging to the school. Do I feel like I'm a member of the campus community? Does the university value me? Do I belong here? Students who didn't strongly identify with the university showed higher levels of prejudice against international students.

"Among the predictors of prejudice against international students that administrators can influence, university identity came out as an important independent predictor," says Quinton. "If you increase university identity and make everyone feel like they belong to one group then the division between domestic and international students should become smaller."

Standardized test scores marginally predicted prejudice. Those domestic students with lower SAT scores had higher levels of prejudice. Domestic students who had fewer positive stereotypes and more negative stereotypes also tended to be prejudiced against internationals.

But socialization is also critical, and it can positively impact those who would otherwise be highly prejudiced against international students, according to Quinton.

She says the process of getting acquainted predicted levels of prejudice.

"Particular kinds of socialization matter the most: Do we study together? Do we share activities together? Do we have the kinds of close contact that can build friendships? That mattered," says Quinton. "For those with lower SAT scores, for those low in positive stereotypes, for those high in Trump support, the more they socialized with international students the lower their ."

"University identity and socialization are both positive factors that universities can foster and that everyone can benefit from."

The results from Quinton's research come on the heels of the first national decrease in international enrollment at American universities after years of increases. Statistics from the U.S. State Department show a 17 percent decline in 2017 in student visas.

That drop had a significant economic impact on the country.

Between 2015 and 2016, international students contributed nearly $33 billion to the U.S. economy and supported over 400,000 jobs, according to NAFSA: Association for International Educators.

Quinton sees the globalization experience as enriching for domestic and alike.

"International students are part of the fiber and fabric of American universities. They bring different experiences, cultures, backgrounds, languages and ideas. Domestic students gain a great deal from the presence of internationals on campus and develop a deeper understanding of the world because of that diversity.

"Universities should make the effort to address these variables because the potential benefits are so great, for all involved," she says.

Explore further: Research shows Native American mascots and logos hurt all ethnic groups

More information: Wendy J. Quinton, Unwelcome on campus? Predictors of prejudice against international students., Journal of Diversity in Higher Education (2018). DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000091

Related Stories

Study reveals prejudice strongly influenced by inequality

October 6, 2017

New research co-led by a Victoria University of Wellington researcher shows that encouraging interpersonal interactions to reduce prejudice—a key strategy used around the world—might not be as effective as previously ...

Recommended for you

University choice and achievement partly down to DNA

October 18, 2018

Research from King's College London has shown for the first time that genetics plays a significant role in whether young adults choose to go to university, which university they choose to attend and how well they do.

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

V4Vendicar
2 / 5 (4) Aug 29, 2018
Expel the Trump supporters. They are functionally brain dead anyhow.
jonesdave
2 / 5 (8) Aug 29, 2018
Expel the Trump supporters. They are functionally brain dead anyhow.


By definition.
Surveillance_Egg_Unit
3 / 5 (4) Aug 30, 2018
Expel the Trump supporters. They are functionally brain dead anyhow.


By definition.
says V4 and jonesy

Perhaps the two of you can explain where and how you have come by such a discriminatory and biased piece of propagandist vitriolic BS.

Oh wait. Of course. You have been taught in high school or college by Socialist/Marxist teachers and professors, who themselves had been taught by educators who are members of the American Communist Party or the equivalent in the NZ school system.

Just don't complain and cry if the Socialists get into power in the US and/or NZ and proceed to raise your income taxes (and every other tax) to the highest numbers so that you will be made impoverished and deprived, not only of your hard-earned wage but also of your freedoms that you hold so cheaply.

Or you might think that it can only happen to the "other" guy. eh?
Pediopal
4 / 5 (4) Aug 30, 2018
"Trump supporters on campuses more likely to show prejudice toward international students:" never saw that one coming.....Whouda' thunk?
PTTG
not rated yet Aug 31, 2018
Like always, it's good to use science to confirm our hunches, and thereby to discover when we are wrong.
TheMuffinMan
not rated yet Aug 31, 2018
Expel the Trump supporters. They are functionally brain dead anyhow.


By definition.


Yeah, because it sounds like you two are just the shinning example of non-prejudice fun.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.