Scientist begins developing instrument for finding extraterrestrial bacteria

August 9, 2018 by Lori Keesey, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
NASA scientist Melissa Floyd holds her 3D-printed FISHbot prototype, which she is advancing to search for bacterial life on Mars and other solar system targets. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Bill Hrybyk

A NASA scientist wants to create a planetary robot that would mimic what biologists do every day in terrestrial laboratories: look through microscopes to visually identify microbial life living in samples.

Although very early in its technology development, the concept would take NASA's hunt for to the next level by actually looking for bacteria and archaea in soil and rock samples. So far, NASA's rovers have carried tools and instruments designed to look for biosignatures or signs of life that indicate habitability, not life itself, regardless of how primitive.

"Life exists everywhere on Earth, even in places that are incompatible to humans," said Melissa Floyd, a scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who is using Goddard Internal Research and Development program funding to automate subsystems for a laboratory breadboard called FISHBot. "I had this idea, actually a major assumption on my part: what if life evolved on Mars the same way it did here on Earth? Certainly, Mars was bombarded with the same soup of chemistry as Earth."

It's not a huge assumption to make, she added. Nucleotides—the molecules that form deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid—have been found in comets. Better known as DNA and RNA, these molecules store and transfer genetic information at a cellular level in all living organisms on Earth.

Search for Bacteria and Archaea

To find life on another planet, Floyd's robotic instrument would concentrate on identifying bacteria and archaea, members of a large group of single-cell microorganisms that thrive in diverse environments and are thought to be the first organisms to appear on Earth about 4 billion years ago. On Earth, one gram of soil typically contains about 40 million bacterial cells and a milliliter of fresh water usually holds 1 million cells.

Her concept, which she believes could deploy as a stand-alone robot or one of several instruments on a rover, relies on a widely used technique called fluorescent in situ hybridization—or FISH—developed to detect and locate the presence or absence of RNA or single-stranded DNA sequences on chromosomes. These threadlike structures are found in the nuclei of most living cells and carry in the form of genes. Since its development, FISH has been used for genetic counseling, medicine and species identification.

When performed in a laboratory, FISH involves, among other things, applying a sample to a slide, fixing the cells to increase cell-wall permeability, adding a nucleotide "probe"—a short sequence of typically 15 to 20 nucleotides along with a fluorescent tag for faster identification—and heating the sample. The slide is then placed under a microscope. When the nucleotide probe attaches to a similar nucleotide in the sample, it literally fluoresces or glows under a fluorescence microscope, helping researchers to identify the organism.

"I'm trying to determine whether I can do the same thing with a robot," Floyd said, adding that she would want the system to carry as many as 10 probes to identify a broad range of single-cell organisms. "If there are even fragments of highly conserved genetic sequences that we see in every corner of Earth, FISH will be the tool capable of detecting it."

The Automation Challenge

The challenge, she said, is simplifying and automating the process so that samples can be prepared on individual slides, heated, and automatically rotated for viewing under a microscope, which likely would have to be focused many times to see deep within the . With her funding, Floyd is developing the automated subsystems, including a focuser.

"The idea here is to replace with a robotic system what a scientist does in the lab," she said. "I could be completely wrong" about taking root on Mars or another solar system body in the same way that it did on Earth. "But how do we know? We've never looked."

Explore further: Is Mars' soil too dry to sustain life?

Related Stories

Is Mars' soil too dry to sustain life?

July 24, 2018

Life as we know it needs water to thrive. Even so, we see life persist in the driest environments on Earth. But how dry is too dry? At what point is an environment too extreme for even microorganisms, the smallest and often ...

If intelligent aliens exist, why haven't we seen them?

August 2, 2018

Thousands of planets have been discovered in the last few decades, although astronomers tell us there are probably billions. In such a large and diverse set of solar systems, it seems impossible that humans could be the only ...

Tesla in space could carry bacteria from Earth

February 27, 2018

A red Tesla convertible hitched a ride to space with a SpaceX rocket in early February, bringing with it what may be the largest load of earthly bacteria to ever enter space.

New technique for finding life on Mars

January 18, 2018

Researchers demonstrate for the first time the potential of existing technology to directly detect and characterize life on Mars and other planets. The study, published in Frontiers in Microbiology, used miniaturized scientific ...

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mark Thomas
5 / 5 (1) Aug 09, 2018
Welcome news for anyone who ever wished NASA would send a microscope to Mars. Just another reason why I love NASA.
3 / 5 (2) Aug 09, 2018
Yeah...I can't remember how many rovers/probes and every time I'm like: if youre looking for life, why don't you ever pack a friggin microscope?

That's so much more versatile than just looking for trace elements or byproducts...because these byproducts are specific to Earth organsims and not necessarily to any alien ones.

It doesn't even need to be complicated. Single use is fine. If there are archaea or bacteria then they'll be everywhere, so careful sample selection is unecessary.
Mark Thomas
5 / 5 (1) Aug 09, 2018
AAP, obviously I am with you on this, as are a lot of folks over many years.

Another one is a (working) microphone. I could make some arguments about correlating sound with rover activities, maybe diagnosing rover problems, and the possibility of unexpected discoveries, etc., but Carl Sagan advocated for it and considering how small an ask it is, we shouldn't really question it so much IMHO.
1 / 5 (1) Aug 14, 2018
Another one is a (working) microphone.

Microphones don't really work well in an atmosphere only about 1% as dense as Earth's
Mark Thomas
not rated yet Aug 15, 2018
Microphones don't really work well in an atmosphere only about 1% as dense as Earth's

Obviously. NASA put the cameras at roughly human eye level on Opportunity and Spirit to give us a sense what it would be like to be there. Adding a (muffled) sound track seems like a good idea too. For scientific purposes, the obvious solution is to amplify the signals.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.