Ant-y social: Study of ants reveals the evolutionary benefits of group living

Ant-y social: Study of ants reveals the evolutionary benefits of group living
Kronauer observes his many ants via a novel tracking setup, used for the first time in this study. Credit: Alex Wild

Common wisdom suggests that two heads are better than one. Yet, two heads can also butt—and when resources are scarce, competition may seem more attractive than collaboration. With that in mind, biologists have long wondered how civil societies evolve.

"You would think, if you pair similar individuals from a single species, their function would be redundant, If anything, there should be competition between individuals," says Daniel Kronauer, the Stanley S. and Sydney R. Shuman Associate Professor. However, in a recent study published in Nature, Kronauer shows that living confers immediate benefits, even among genetically identical individuals.

Over a 45-day period, Kronauer's team monitored clonal raider ants (Ooceraea biroi) in groups ranging in size from 1 to 16 individuals. They observed that larger groups produced more offspring and experienced greater stability than smaller groups. The bigger groups also exhibited a greater division of labor: even though the ants were extremely similar, group living somehow prompted the insects to specialize in particular tasks.

Specialization isn't the only advantage of living in a group, however. In developing a mathematical model, the researchers were able to determine, among other things, that increased group size led to increased stability, regardless of whether the divided their responsibilities. "You don't need specialization to see an effect, but with specialization the effect becomes stronger," says Kronauer.

Ant-y social: Study of ants reveals the evolutionary benefits of group living
Kronauer's team observed ants for 45 days to determine whether group size affects colony behavior and stability. Credit: Yuko Ulrich and Asaf Gal

Results from both the ant observations and the model indicate that individuals benefit from group living even when those groups are quite small—a finding that has significant implications for understanding the evolution of social behavior.

"It's easy to see how individuals work together in more , such as those with queens and workers, because they have distinct roles. But that's not how started out," says Kronauer. "This research shows that very simple societies can have an evolutionary advantage over living by themselves—which provides a stepping stone to understanding how complex societies evolved from solitary animals."

Researchers at Princeton and Rockefeller Universities investigated ant colonies to look at the relationship between group size and social behaviors. They found that simply increasing group size, even if it doesn't lead to division of labor, can benefit members of the group. Clonal raider ants, like those seen here, form a dense cluster in which ants care for the offspring while others sporadically leave the cluster to forage. Researchers marked the ants with individual paint tags for automated behavioral tracking. Credit: Daniel Kronauer, Rockefeller University

More information: Y. Ulrich et al, Fitness benefits and emergent division of labour at the onset of group living, Nature (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0422-6

Journal information: Nature

Citation: Ant-y social: Study of ants reveals the evolutionary benefits of group living (2018, August 22) retrieved 25 June 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Ant study sheds light on the evolution of workers and queens


Feedback to editors