Sketching out a transcription factor code—binding patterns reflect factors' gene expression roles

Sketching out a transcription factor code—binding patterns reflect factors' gene expression roles
Credit: Susanna M. Hamilton, Broad Communications

The sites where transcription factors bind within regulatory DNA fall into six distinct patterns that overlap with the factors' functions, Broad scientists find, helping advance a goal of regulatory genomics.

The rules dictating how regulatory DNA elements called enhancers control ' expression remain murky, but it is clear that they act through specialized proteins called transcription factors (TFs). A group of Broad scientists has found that TFs' binding sites within enhancers cluster in distinct patterns reflecting the factors' roles in control.

These patterns, which may constitute a position-based code, could be a boon to researchers trying to learn how to predict enhancers' activities from sequence data alone.

The team, led by graduate student Sharon Grossman and institute director Eric Lander, reported their findings in PNAS.

TFs bind to enhancers (which oversee whole programs of gene expression) and other regulatory elements called promoters (from which gene transcription begins) at specific sequences called motifs. Once bound, these proteins perform a variety of jobs, from unraveling DNA to reading genes and writing RNA.

The Broad team surveyed 103 factors' motifs in 47 cell types, focusing on nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs): stretches of unwound regulatory DNA where TFs can bind. When the team compared the motifs' locations, six distinct groups emerged, overlapping with the factors' known roles.

Sketching out a transcription factor code—binding patterns reflect factors' gene expression roles
Motif clustering patterns within noncoding DNA. Click to see the full size image. Adapted from Grossman et al., PNAS 2018. Credit: Susanna M. Hamilton, Broad Communications

The groups were not evenly distributed across all of the NDRs the team examined. Rather, the team noted, certain groups consistently occurred together in all 47 . For instance, enhancers harboring group 4 motifs also contained more motifs from group 3 and fewer from groups 5 and 6—suggesting that different combinations of TFs may work with different kinds of enhancers.

The team's findings represent a new step toward a long-term goal: defining a model for predicting ' activities within a given cell type by looking at their DNA sequence. They open the door to additional insights into what constitutes an active, functional enhancer, as opposed to an inactive one.

More information: Sharon R. Grossman et al. Positional specificity of different transcription factor classes within enhancers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804663115

Citation: Sketching out a transcription factor code—binding patterns reflect factors' gene expression roles (2018, July 11) retrieved 24 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2018-07-transcription-factor-codebinding-patterns-factors039.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

New insights into the epigenetic control of hematopoiesis

7 shares

Feedback to editors