Scientists propose solution to 'Gaia puzzle'

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Scientists may have solved a long-standing puzzle over why conditions on Earth have remained stable enough for life to evolve over billions of years. The 'Gaia' hypothesis proposed that living things interacting with inorganic processes somehow keep the planet in a state where life can persist—despite threats such as a brightening sun, volcanoes and meteorite strikes.

The puzzle of how this might work has divided experts for decades, but a team led by scientists from the University of Exeter have proposed a solution. They say stability could come from "sequential selection" in which situations where destabilises the environment tend to be short-lived and result in further change until a stable situation emerges, which then tends to persist.

Once this happens, the system has more time to acquire further traits that help to stabilise and maintain it—a process known as "selection by survival alone".

"We can now explain how the Earth has accumulated stabilising mechanisms over the past 3.5 billion years of life on the planet," said Professor Tim Lenton, of the University of Exeter.

"The central problem with the original Gaia hypothesis was that evolution via natural selection cannot explain how the whole planet came to have stabilising properties over geologic timescales."

"Instead, we show that at least two simpler mechanisms work together to give our planet with life self-stabilising properties."

He added: "Our findings can help explain how we came to be here to wonder about this question in the first place."

Professor Dave Wilkinson, of the University of Lincoln, who was also involved in the research, added: "I have been involved in trying to figure out how

Gaia might work for over 20 years—finally it looks like a series of promising ideas are all coming together to provide the understanding I have been searching for."

Dr. James Dyke, of the University of Southampton, also an author on the paper, said: "As well as being important for helping to estimate the probability of complex life elsewhere in the universe, the mechanisms we identify may prove crucial in understanding how our home planet may respond to drivers such as human-produced climate change and extinction events."

Creating transformative solutions to the global changes that humans are now causing is a key focus of the University of Exeter's new Global Systems Institute, directed by Professor Lenton, who said: "We can learn some lessons from Gaia on how to create a flourishing, sustainable, stable future for 9-11 billion people this century."

The Gaia hypothesis, first put forward by James Lovelock in the 1970s, was named after the deity who personified the Earth in Greek mythology.

The paper, published in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution, is entitled: "Selection for Gaia across multiple scales."

Explore further

New book finds Gaia Hypothesis implausible

More information: Trends in Ecology and Evolution (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.05.006
Journal information: Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Citation: Scientists propose solution to 'Gaia puzzle' (2018, July 2) retrieved 24 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 03, 2018
Maybe they should also be studying what it might take to push the whole thing so far out of balance that it collapses the ability to sustain any life at all. We certainly seem to be doing our damnedest to conduct an uncontrolled experiment in exactly that, and it might be nice to know in advance of our own extinction whether we had succeeded.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more