Mapping mountaintop coal mining's yearly spread in Appalachia

July 25, 2018, Duke University
A new mapping tool uses satellite imagery to reveal where mountaintop coal mining is underway in Appalachia, going back more than three decades. This animation illustrates the pace of mountaintop mining across more than 10,000 square miles near Charleston, West Virginia, from 1985 to 2015. Forested areas appear green, whereas mined areas appear yellow. Credit: Time-lapse by Christian Thomas

The coal industry may have declined in the last decade because of the rise of cheap natural gas, but a coal mining method called mountaintop removal is still taking place, particularly in central Appalachia.

A new web-based mapping tool shows, in more detail than ever before, the land laid bare by mountaintop mining in central Appalachia each year, going back more than three decades.

The tool uses satellite imagery to identify and map the annual extent of mining activity across a four-state area including portions of Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia.

In the journal PLOS ONE, researchers estimate that between 1985 and 2015, an average of 21,000 acres was converted to bare earth and rubble in central Appalachia each year—an area about half the size of Washington, D.C.

This analysis places the total estimate since the 1970s at about 1.5 million acres. "That is an area 18 percent larger than the state of Delaware, and only 3 percent smaller than Everglades National Park," said first author Andrew Pericak, who conducted the research in the lab of biology professor Emily Bernhardt at Duke University.

Mountaintop mining is a form of surface coal mining in which coal companies clear the forest from a hilltop, then use explosives and heavy machinery to blast and dig through the soil and bedrock and expose the layers of coal underneath. The leftover rock and debris is pushed into adjacent valleys, burying streams under hundreds of meters of rubble called "valley fill."

Advocates say the process allows mining companies to harvest shallow seams of coal they can't get at via traditional underground mining. But growing scientific evidence suggests it also destroys forests, fills the air with harmful dust and contaminates nearby streams.

Determining the timing and extent of mining activity is crucial to assessing and mitigating these environmental and human impacts, said co-author Matthew Ross, previously at Duke and now a post-doctoral researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

But reliable, up-to-date estimates of mining's footprint are hard to come by. In any given year, a mining company may only be operating within a portion of the area shown on their mining permit. Previous efforts have mapped surface mining in Appalachia using satellite imagery, but these maps haven't been updated since 2006, and only give a snapshot of mining every 10 years, rather than year-to-year.

The tool developed by Duke researchers, working with partners at the nonprofit organizations SkyTruth and Appalachian Voices, reveals where mountaintop mining is underway on a finer time scale, and makes it easier to keep the data current.

The team used Google's Earth Engine cloud-computing platform to process U.S. government satellite images of visible and invisible light reflected from the Earth's surface, taken over 31 consecutive years in a 74-county area.

A new mapping tool uses satellite imagery to reveal where mountaintop coal mining is underway in Appalachia, going back more than three decades. This animation illustrates the pace of mountaintop mining across more than 10,000 square miles near Charleston, West Virginia, from 1985 to 2015. Forested areas appear green, whereas mined areas appear yellow. Credit: Time-lapse by Christian Thomas, SkyTruth

Each pixel in 10,240 satellite images, going back to 1985, was analyzed by a computer algorithm that used reflectance data to determine the "greenness" of each small square of the image, which represents a 100-by-100-foot square of Earth.

A collection of pixels that appeared largely devoid of vegetation and wasn't part of a city, road or body of water was labeled as an area where mining was likely occurring that year, with at least 83 percent accuracy in any given year.

"It just took a matter of minutes to output the data set," Pericak said. "It's a huge time save."

The team also combined their mine area estimates with previously published data on coal production. In the 1980s and 1990s, they found, every 100 square feet of land in the region yielded one ton of coal. By 2010, however, coal companies needed to clear and blast about 160 square feet per ton, and by 2015, it took more than 300 square feet.

"It takes more land to get the same amount of coal than it had in the past," Pericak said.

The results are consistent with what geologists since the mid-1990s have forewarned—that as thicker, more accessible layers of coal are mined out, the ratio of waste rock and soil to coal will increase, along with operating costs, Ross said.

Senior co-author Emily Bernhardt says the updated maps will help researchers come up with more accurate estimates of the costs and benefits of mountaintop mining, and how it compares with other forms of resource extraction.

"Any scientist interested in studying the impacts of mountaintop mining can now see exactly where mines are in the landscape and how long those impacts have been active," said Bernhardt, who is using the data to understand more precisely how affects water quality, how far the effects extend downstream and how long they persist.

Indiana University professor Michael Hendryx, who was not involved in the study, has been using the updated maps to assess air pollution exposure and other health effects in people living near active mining sites, compared with people living farther away.

"It also provides the public a better opportunity for monitoring mining operations to ensure they are adhering to the conditions in their permits," said co-author Christian Thomas of SkyTruth. "Any new problems that crop up could potentially be acted on and corrected more effectively with this annual look at the region."

Thomas says SkyTruth plans to use the data to measure the effectiveness of reclamation efforts after mining has stopped. "This is the key to helping the region recover from this legacy of mining and transition to a non-mining future," Thomas said.

The data and computer code are free for anyone to use, and future activity can be quickly added to the dataset as new becomes available, Pericak said.

Explore further: Increased risk of depression linked to mountaintop coal mining

More information: "Mapping the Yearly Extent of Surface Coal Mining in Central Appalachia Using Landsat and Google Earth Engine," Andrew Pericak, Christian Thomas, David Kroodsma, Matthew Wasson, Matthew Ross, Nicholas Clinton, David Campagna, Yolandita Franklin, Emily Bernhardt and John Amos. PLOS ONE, July 25, 2018.

Watch a timeline of active mining for any location in central Appalachia or time period between 1985 and 2015 at

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Death near the shoreline, not life on land

December 13, 2018

Our understanding of when the very first animals started living on land is helped by identifying trace fossils—the tracks and trails left by ancient animals—in sedimentary rocks that were deposited on the continents.

The long dry: global water supplies are shrinking

December 13, 2018

A global study has found a paradox: our water supplies are shrinking at the same time as climate change is generating more intense rain. And the culprit is the drying of soils, say researchers, pointing to a world where drought-like ...

New climate model to be built from the ground up

December 13, 2018

Facing the certainty of a changing climate coupled with the uncertainty that remains in predictions of how it will change, scientists and engineers from across the country are teaming up to build a new type of climate model ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Jul 25, 2018
Looking on Google Earth, its hard to see any impact from mining in this area. I presume the miners are required to rehabilitate worked areas. What you do see is areas cleared for farming and urbanization. Farming in particular always seems to get a free pass when it comes to environmental impact but it typically involves forest clearing (ie CO2 emissions) and almost total loss of flora and fauna from the cleared areas. Surface mining is a one off activity whereas farming is continuous.
not rated yet Jul 26, 2018
Mountainous terrain generally isn't suitable for farming.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.