Fighting 'fake news' with the law

July 13, 2018
Critics say legislation to fight 'fake news' could compromise freedom of expression

Some countries are bringing in legislation to fight "fake news", a particular menace during election campaigning, but critics warn of the danger to freedom of expression and the media.

Here is a look at the situation in a selection of countries.


The adopted in June 2017 a law against the posting on social media of hate speech, child pornography, terror-related items and false .

Under the law platforms like Facebook and Twitter can be punished with fines of up to 50 million euros ($58 million) if they fail to remove such illegal content.

Their directors can also be individually fined five million euros.

Critics have warned the law will stifle legitimate free speech by prompting the platforms to excessively delete and censor posts as a precaution.


Two controversial draft laws are under discussion in the French parliament aimed at guarding against "the manipulation of information" during an electoral period.

The legislation would enable a candidate or political party to ask the courts to order an immediate halt to the publication of information deemed to be false in the three months leading up to a national election.

Backed by President Emmanuel Macron, the draft has been criticised by opposition parliamentarians as an attack on freedom of expression and a move to create "thought police".

They have also railed against attempts to define what amounts to false information.


No less than 14 draft laws related to "" are under examination in the Brazilian parliament, with disinformation a looming battleground in the highly connected country ahead of contested presidential elections in October.

One of the drafts has already passed to the upper house and provides for jail sentences of up to three years for the diffusion on the internet of false information "related to health, security, the national economy, the electoral process or all other subjects of public interest".

Ten of Brazil's 35 political parties signed in June an agreement with the election authority to fight "the dissemination of false information".


The Malaysian parliament in April 2018 approved a law punishing the propagation of partially or totally with prison sentences of up to six years and fines of $130,000.

It was slammed by the political opposition and rights groups as an attempt to silence criticism of the increasingly authoritarian government.

The opposition went on to win elections in May and the new prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, who had been among the critics, stunned public opinion when he said the law would be reviewed but not abolished.

Following an outcry, Mahathir has said the legislation will be repealed when parliament reconvenes in July.


President Uhuru Kenyatta signed into law in May a sweeping cyber-crimes act that criminalises online bullying but also aims to stop the spread of "fake news".

One clause targets the publication of "false, misleading or fictitious data", providing punishment of $50,000 or up to two years in prison, or both.

Critics argue it could stifle press freedom and make it easy for authorities to stop journalists from publishing information they dislike.

After a petition was filed to challenge the law, the High Court in late May suspended its full implementation until a ruling is made.

Rights activists have warned of an increasingly hostile and oppressive environment for journalists after a dramatic and bloody season in 2017.

Explore further: Egypt looks to monitor popular social media users

Related Stories

Egypt looks to monitor popular social media users

June 28, 2018

Freedom of expression may shrink further in Egypt where lawmakers have approved the first reading of a bill that would monitor popular social media users in the name of combating "false news".

Recommended for you

Can China keep it's climate promises?

March 26, 2019

China can easily meet its Paris climate pledge to peak its greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, but sourcing 20 percent of its energy needs from renewables and nuclear power by that date may be considerably harder, researchers ...

In the Tree of Life, youth has its advantages

March 26, 2019

It's a question that has captivated naturalists for centuries: Why have some groups of organisms enjoyed incredibly diversity—like fish, birds, insects—while others have contained only a few species—like humans.

Cellular microRNA detection with miRacles

March 26, 2019

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding regulatory RNAs that can repress gene expression post-transcriptionally and are therefore increasingly used as biomarkers of disease. Detecting miRNAs can be arduous and expensive as ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 14, 2018
If there was ever anything that should not (in fact - cannot) be legislated, it has to lie within the realm of arbitering 'truth' in the newsmedia.
The next step will inevitably be the creation of an additional police bureaucracy called 'Minitrue'.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.