More mystery objects detected near Milky Way's supermassive black hole

Oliver Manuel your office called.

So this is how the proto-deitistic giant space dust bunnies reproduce....

I am in awe!

What about the idea of black holes circling other black holes?

The question is then, why are they so large?"

OK then, why? Perhaps because they are within a region of space containing extreme matter density, thereby providing a sink for the draining of the all pervasive sub-quantum field components.

This extreme migration toward the sink alters the surrounding region of space to make more fertile the conditions for accelerated generation of new matter, especially within the cores of nearby stars. These close by stars then become extremely active, thereby outgassing to the extreme to produce their surrounding clouds. For this reason the clouds do not get broken apart, since they are being continually sourced from the outgassing, extremely active orbiting stars.

Ah, but that is too much for a merger maniac to consider! Stay instead safely within your technical sandbox. Dream on.

Amazing the numbers of things that can be imaged near the center of the galaxy at point Sgr A, everything but the black hole, supposedly the most massive object of the entire galaxy.

"If they were gas clouds, G1 and G2 would not have been able to stay intact,"

Or, gravity is not responsible for the dynamics at these scales. Shhh, but don't tell the gravity only acolytes though

"If they were gas clouds, G1 and G2 would not have been able to stay intact,"

Kinda funny isn't it? You'd think as smart as these Cosmologists imagine themselves to be that they'd eventually stumble upon the most obvious reason for this, like NO BLACK HOLE at galactic center point Sgr A.

What a way to live a fantasy, deny the obvious, that if everything else at Sgr A can be imaged, how is it that the most obvious object so magically escapes imaging?

^^^^^^^^Still as thick as two short planks!

^^^^^^^^Still as thick as two short planks!

Well at least you can admit it. And you absolutely must be if you believe in pseudoscientific claptrap of BH, DM, and such.

^^^^^^^^Still as thick as two short planks!

Well at least you can admit it. And you absolutely must be if you believe in pseudoscientific claptrap of BH, DM, and such.

Lol. From the loon that thinks comets are electric rocks, and that Earth used to orbit Saturn! Your whole cult is built on pseudoscience, woo boy.

Says a consensus stooge whose faith is in the theological construct of Big Bang.
The only black hole is the one in your brain sucking all the common sense out,

^^^^^^^^Still as thick as two short planks!

Your trademark little round man still living in your divorced mommy's basement.

Lol. From the loon that thinks comets are electric rocks, and that Earth used to orbit Saturn! Your whole cult is built on pseudoscience, woo boy.

.......at least we know Saturn & Earth exist, you can't say that about your black hole fantasy at the galactic centerpoint known as Sgr A.......hey little round man, you got pics? I do: http://ircamera.a...ter.htm, 7th & 8th pics from the top of the page.....no black hole at Sgr A,

If there is no BH at the point Sgr A, how much force of gravity can you imagine exists there explaining why these so called gas clouds are not being torn asunder? Here I'll give you the EXACT answer, ZERO, invoking the observable effects of the Inverse Square Law. Call upstairs to mommy & have her toss down another bag of potato chips into the basement for you.

^^^^^^^Like I said - thick. Picture of a black hole! Oh dear. What grade are you in?

Says a consensus stooge whose faith is in the theological construct of Big Bang.
The only black hole is the one in your brain sucking all the common sense out,

Sorry, what common sense would that be? That Earth used to orbit Saturn? Physically impossible. That Venus was spat out of Jupiter, and did handbrake turns around the solar system? Physically impossible. I could go on, but you get the idea. No, the difference here is down to those with scientific knowledge and understanding, and those who are too stupid to see why their woo is ridiculed. Which is why they get conned by loons like Thornhill.

They are impossible in your gravity on universe where the weakest of the forces, gravity, is the only relevant mover and you're missing 96% of your universe.

Whereas in an Electric Universe this is not only possible, it is expected.

"Gravitational systems are the 'ashes' of prior electrical systems." Hannes Alfven

If there is no BH at the point Sgr A, how much force of gravity can you imagine exists there explaining why these so called gas clouds are not being torn asunder? Here I'll give you the EXACT answer, ZERO,

Sorry, who said this was a gas cloud? It seems to me that that is not what the article is saying. What is their mass? What is their current distance from the BH? As they say, we'll have to wait at least 20 years to be sure. And yet a scientifically illiterate loon on the comments section of a science news site somehow knows precisely what they are, and what should happen to them. Sorry, I'll stick to real science by those that understand it, as opposed to Dunning-Kruger affected nutjobs.

Whereas in an Electric Universe this is not only possible, it is expected.

As far as science is concerned, there is no 'electric universe.' Please point us to their scientific publications on any relevant science. These people believe Earth used to orbit Saturn! Why on Earth would anybody take them seriously?

Whereas in an Electric Universe this is not only possible, it is expected.

As far as science is concerned, there is no 'electric universe.' Please point us to their scientific publications on any relevant science. These people believe Earth used to orbit Saturn! Why on Earth would anybody take them seriously?

says jd

Earth orbiting Saturn? Interesting concept. If such an orbit had been possible, one would think that it should have happened when the planets in our solar system were still smaller pieces of rock without enough of a gravitational pull from a sufficiently coalesced Sun to rein each one in to revolve around the Sun itself. Not to agree or disagree, but depending on the age you are referring to, the inner planets could have revolved/orbited around larger gassy planets such as Saturn as though they were its moons. It is also possible that near-misses could have knocked the inner planets out of those orbits and begun their orbits around the Sun.

-CONTINUED-
WRT an "Electric Universe", HOW do you KNOW the science is infallible as it is now?

https://www.scien...galaxies

"…with apparently separate galaxies connected into vast intergalactic webs by invisible filaments of dark matter." It also mentions "threads" which I take to mean that these threads/filaments are electrical in nature, whether dark matter or not.

Also, https://www.scien...tstart=1
mentions 'filaments'. The picture in this link is very reminiscent of the neurons all linked by synapses within a mammalian brain - also electrical.

Earth orbiting Saturn? Interesting concept. If such an orbit had been possible, one would think that it should have happened when the planets in our solar system were still smaller pieces of rock without enough......

Nope, couple of weeks ago last Tuesday, according to these nutjobs! Well, .....within human memory, because our ancestors wrote about it! Not really, but that is how they've misinterpreted the mythology to come up with this nonsense. Google "The Saturn Myth" by David Talbott. Total woo.

^^^^^^^^

says jd

Is that your version of a row of vagina hats?

Some of the stupidest comments on the internet can be found here. Every tinfoil hat cuckoo conspiracy theorist comes here, reads an article, then says, "I'm not a scientist, but I did spend the night at a Holiday Inn." Real knowledge doesn't come from no-name armchair nit wits. Real science is a lot harder than making up theories in the dark. It is better to be thought a fool than to remove all doubt.

Earth orbiting Saturn? Interesting concept. If such an orbit had been possible, one would think that it should have happened when the planets in our solar system were still smaller pieces of rock without enough......

Nope, couple of weeks ago last Tuesday, according to these nutjobs! Well, .....within human memory, because our ancestors wrote about it! Not really, but that is how they've misinterpreted the mythology to come up with this nonsense. Google "The Saturn Myth" by David Talbott. Total woo.

says jd

I am reading the Kindle version of The Saturn Myth by Talbott. I will get back to you as soon as I have finished. Thanks for your patience.

@ Egg-Skippy. How you are? I am fine and dandy, thanks for asking.

I am reading the Kindle version of The Saturn Myth by Talbott.

Cher, I got to know one thing. You pay for him or you are reading a pirate copy?

I will get back to you as soon as I have finished.

S'il vous plaît and hurry Skippy, I am sure I am not alone in really wanting to know how he turns out. It's got to be at least as interesting and informational as the plasma-magnetic-electrical-universe stuffs that get posted up here.

Thanks for your patience.

De rien mon amie, but I can only speak for me. Everybody else might be really impatient about hearing all about it, and they might get rude if you take too long.

Oh yeah, I almost forget. Is your own edition of the Saturn Myth the version with the directions in the back on how to make a silly looking pointy cap?

@jonesdave
I cannot comment on every one of the paragraphs from the book, whether I agree with them or not. Space doesn't allow it.
In the Introduction, the first paragraph says that: "The planet Saturn today is recognizable only to those who know where to look for it. But a few thousand years
ago Saturn dominated the earth as a sun, presiding over a universal Golden Age."

"A few thousand years ago"? "Dominated the Earth as a Sun"? "Within human memory"?
--CONTINUED--

--CONTINUED--

I see what MAY have happened. IMO, it is likely that Talbott read the Bible, the part of the Old Testament in Genesis1-3 that says, "And God said, Let there be light, and there was light", and then he tried to make sense of that passage by thinking that the "source of that light" was the giant gassy planet, Saturn. (While there IS a possibility that a giant gassy planet could have ignited and shone briefly, it would have occurred BILLIONS of years ago and long before humans were created, as well as the first single-cell life forms previously created in the waters of Earth.)

He MAY have rejected the "6-day 24-hour creation cycle", as I do. But he needed a replacement to explain how and why the Creator could provide the Light for the subsequent growth of grasses, herbs and fruit trees, which would be dependent upon light to grow. Gen1-11,12. As I said earlier, the Sun would not have coalesced sufficiently and ignited at that time.
--CONTINUED--

--CONTINUED--
Talbott MAY have somehow equated the ancient Sun worshippers with those who later worshipped the planet Saturn as a god. It just as well could have been Jupiter which is closer to Earth. There may have been a lot of activity going on in outer space within our Solar System in those times and Velikovsky studied the historic artifacts and came up with his conclusions.

An ancient memory could have been handed down from the earliest Homo species through their generations through word-of-mouth or some other form of communication and then through symbolic carvings.

The 2 books by Immanuel Velikovsky and David Talbott are interesting reads, in any case. Thanks for the recommendation, jones.

Some of the stupidest comments on the internet can be found here. Every tinfoil hat cuckoo conspiracy theorist comes here, reads an article, then says, "I'm not a scientist, but I did spend the night at a Holiday Inn." Real knowledge doesn't come from no-name armchair nit wits. Real science is a lot harder than making up theories in the dark. It is better to be thought a fool than to remove all doubt.

says Whys

In your comment above, there is no evidence of any scientific knowledge/facts offered by you to offset your "tinfoil hat cuckoo conspiracy theorist" opinion of other commenters. What a waste of characters and space. But I see that you were rated a '5' by five people. Your comment only deserves a '1', but that is MY opinion.

Talbott MAY have somehow equated the ancient Sun worshippers with those who later worshipped the planet Saturn

The idea here is that the Earth, Venus, and Mars were part of the Saturnian system, Saturn being a brown dwarf star. The Sun was already formed, possibly a Herbig-Haro object or a victim of one which interfered with the Saturnian system. Saturn and it system of planets were then captured by the Sun and it's electromagnetic influence. Saturn was the first Sun, being the light of brown dwarf star are conducive of life, the conditions within its sphere of influence would have been Eden like. Eden was the whole of Earth, not just a small region of the Fertile Crescent. This explains tropical like flora and fauna found at the poles.
Once Saturn was captured, the electric currents powering it would have been usurped by the Sun and Saturn would dim. Saturn would have beelined it to its current position, Earth, Venus, and Mars in tow in a polar alignment.

Cont

Saturn leading the way would have shielded the Earth from the Sun's light and Saturn not a star any longer would put the Earth in the shadows. This is the Purple Light of Creation. "On the Seventh day", Saturn found its new home and the Earth, Venus, and Mars continued on their way. Now out of Saturn's shadow, "let there be light!". What followed was the "wars of the gods". The basis for all mythology and religion would have been originated by these events. The worldwide archetypes would have been developed at this time, within human history.

That's very nice.
The only problem is that the Earth, Venus and Mars were never part of the Saturnian system.
You can't really believe that?

You can't really believe that?

Trust me; they do! Frightening, eh?

Talbott MAY have somehow equated the ancient Sun worshippers with those who later worshipped the planet Saturn

The idea here is that the Earth, Venus, and Mars were part of the Saturnian system, Saturn being a brown dwarf star. The Sun was already formed, possibly a Herbig-Haro object or a victim of one which interfered with the Saturnian system. Saturn and it system of planets were then captured by the Sun and it's electromagnetic influence.

says CD85

There were no humans alive to remember or record such planetary activity in our SS. The only possible way that humans could have known such activity would be if they were told it by Holy Angels or the Creator Himself.
Are you saying that the inner planets were closer in to the actual Sun while orbiting Saturn? That would mean that Saturn was also closer to the Sun which you say had existed already during the time that Saturn was also a sun. But if that were so, then the Sun would have drawn in Saturn....
-CONT'D-

-CONTINUED-
...by enough grav. pull and the two bodies would have merged, as well as destroying the 4 planets (depending, of course, on the proximity/distance between the Sun and Saturn.
But IF you are saying that Saturn was in its present orbit with Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars orbiting your 'brown dwarf', there would still have had to be a certain distance between Saturn and those 4 planets (where was Jupiter in all this?), so that those 4 could continue attracting mass from the surrounding gases and dust.
But if the 4 planets orbited Saturn, then how did they come to advance closer to the Sun, which you say had already ignited? And why did Saturn lose its ignition and nuclear fusion/burn? My own answer to that would that it was Divine Intervention that caused such a chain of events. Similar to Trump winning and Hillary losing. LOL

With so much gravity in the region why so much dust after 5billion years?

Considering the general consensus these are extra large stars, are having their plasma stretched and pulled into the light radius stars their orbiting, what is all this dust in the mean getting up to?
With all these ravenous light radius stars there should not be a smidgen of dust left combined with these extra large stars the amount of gravity hovering up all the available dust.
It is surprising there is so much dust remaining after 5billion years!

-CONTINUED-
"Saturn was the first Sun, being the light of brown dwarf star are conducive of life, the conditions within its sphere of influence would have been Eden like. Eden was the whole of Earth, not just a small region of the Fertile Crescent. This explains tropical like flora and fauna found at the poles.
Once Saturn was captured, the electric currents powering it would have been usurped by the Sun and Saturn would dim. Saturn would have beelined it to its current position, Earth, Venus, and Mars in tow in a polar alignment. "
says CD85

Yes, fossilised plant life has been found under the Antarctic ice fields, so that much is true. Plants were the first life forms in the waters after the first single-celled life had diversified/evolved into bacterial and plant/animal life.
I do not see how Saturn could have been 'captured' by the Sun and escaped from merging, again depending on proximity/distance.
-CONTINUED-

-CONTINUED-
If your 'electric currents' powering Saturn had been absorbed by the Sun, then how was Saturn able to advance to its present/current position in the SS? I think that there are two possibilities: Divine Intervention or along comes a large planetary body with enough mass/weight, etc. to PULL Saturn out of its orbit around the Sun, leaving the 4 planets to remain orbiting the Sun and its sphere of influence. I will accept BOTH possibilities: one natural and one supernatural. Both, IMO, are plausible and more likely happened a BYA or more.

Saturn leading the way would have shielded the Earth from the Sun's light and Saturn not a star any longer would put the Earth in the shadows. This is the Purple Light of Creation. "On the Seventh day", Saturn found its new home and the Earth, Venus, and Mars continued on their way. Now out of Saturn's shadow, "let there be light!". What followed was the "wars of the gods". The basis for all mythology and religion would have been originated by these events. The worldwide archetypes would have been developed at this time, within human history.

says CD5

This 'war of the gods" is man-made. There is only ONE Creator who has made all things possible and His Holy Angels.
The term/title God/god/gods is also man-made and is a reflection of man's fear of the unknown. The Creator knows this, and yet allows humans to make their mistakes in life. Religions are also man-made and are found to venerate the evil that is so often done by self-righteous humans.

But I digress.
Your 'Electric Currents' just MAY BE the Filaments that are spoken of in https://www.scien...galaxies
Filaments of Dark Matter. Electromagnetic Fields? Invisible Electric Currents connecting STARS to each other, as well as Galaxies? The possibilities are endless for those who are curious enough to check it out.

The possibilities are endless for those who are stupid enough to believe it.

FTFY.

@jd
Your FTFY seems to be missing from my dictionary and Wiki, so I'll let it pass ss a cryptic remark that is of no great consequence, whether nice or nasty. Making changes to my above comment is not an improvement in the perception of your 'intelligence'. Like any other human, your are free to believe as you see fit. Just don't volunteer for a position at a military nuclear facility...unless it is for floor sweeper.

Fixed That For You.

Fixed That For You.

It would be fun to watch your facial expression(s) if the Electric Currents theory turned out to be credible and within scientific norms. If and when the theory is proven, please refrain from thinking thoughts of suicide or murdering CD85 and his EU buddies. Have a good day, sonny.

Fixed That For You.

It would be fun to watch your facial expression(s) if the Electric Currents theory turned out to be credible and within scientific norms. If and when the theory is proven, please refrain from thinking thoughts of suicide or murdering CD85 and his EU buddies. Have a good day, sonny.

Trust me, unless the laws of physics change anytime soon, that will not be happening. Why do you think nobody takes it seriously?

Anyways, if anybody wants to know where the roots of this electric woo come from, then here is a piece by the former Velikovsky insider, C. Leroy Ellenberger, on Talbott's Saturn nonsense. Leroy doesn't spend much time on the sheer physical impossibility of it all, but it does show how this woo came into being, due to the piss poor scholarship of one deluded person:

An Antidote to Dave Talbott's "Saturn Thesis"
http://www.defend...dote.txt

With so much gravity in the region why so much dust after 5billion years?

Considering the general consensus these are extra large stars, are having their plasma stretched and pulled into the light radius stars their orbiting, what is all this dust in the mean getting up to?
With all these ravenous light radius stars there should not be a smidgen of dust left combined with these extra large stars the amount of gravity hovering up all the available dust.
It is surprising there is so much dust remaining after 5billion years!

says granville583762

Umm perhaps the cleaning lady failed to bring her vacuum cleaner to clean up the excess dust
because there was no Electric Current available?

hehe just joshing ya.

Comets and asteroids come in from interstellar space, bringing microscopic dust motes and gases with them. The Moon is said to be the home of residual superfine dust that can clog spacesuits of astronauts and instruments. Dust is everywhere. Even in us.

With so much gravity in the region why so much dust after 5billion years?

Comets and asteroids come in from interstellar space, bringing microscopic dust motes and gases with them. The Moon is said to be the home of residual superfine dust that can clog spacesuits of astronauts and instruments. Dust is everywhere. Even in us.

From the first stars...

Just don't volunteer for a position at a military nuclear facility...unless it is for floor sweeper.

Why? Do they only employ scientifically illiterate people? What sort of IQ test do you need to fail?

@jonesdave, @Ojorf.

From @jonesdave, re cantdrive/EU claims re Saturn and Planetary dynamics 'history':

"The Saturn Myth" by David Talbott. Total woo.

and

From @Ojorf, re same:

The only problem is that the Earth, Venus and Mars were never part of the Saturnian system.

Guys, ignore 'silly overlays' brought by @cantrdrive/EU 'religionists'. Just concentrate on actual known science:

- our solar system's planets have a 'history' of impacts, relocations, re-orientations etc:

- 'early' phase impacts destroyed many proto/full sized, planetary objects, one/more of which probably resulted in Asteroid Belt;

- strong gravitational interactions may have caused some inner planets to migrate outward and become gas giants there;

- mild (and severe, eg Uranus!) offset spin-axes also indications of 'relocating/re-orientating power of the 'earlier' formation dynamics;

- capture / loss of (even very large) moons/satellites were also likely events back then.

OK? :)

WARNING: HUMOR AHEAD. PROCEED AT OWN RISK!

Hey @cantdrive85, maybe if the Electric Universe and the Plasma Universe 'crowd' had been the first to trademark/employ the prefix "DARK", then Electric Universe and Plasma Universe science/claims would be part of the 'dark' mainstream today....as 'dark somethings' have been all the rage in 'professional' mathematical/theoretical astronomy/cosmology 'explanations/excuses' for decades now. You missed that "dark" boat, mate! :)

^^^^^^^^Err, yes, I think I might have covered that in a degree once upon a time. I don't need telling, and I doubt anybody else does, either. The contention of the EU loons is that this all happened a few thousand years ago, and was recorded in mythology, which they have horribly misinterpreted.

... The picture in this link is very reminiscent of the neurons all linked by synapses within a mammalian brain - also electrical.

Not just mammalian... But only electric after chemical interaction... Which, interestingly enough, is driven by smaller electric exchanges...
They alternate AND work together....

@SEU

by enough grav. pull and the two bodies would have merged,

First, erase your preconceived notions. This isn't your dad's gravity only cosmology. Electromagnetic principles are the prime drivers of these interactions.

IF you are saying that Saturn was in its present orbit

No, Saturn was its own system. So too with the Sun, two systems. They came too close to one another, their "wires crossed". Saturn was captured electromagnetically by the Sun.

how was Saturn able to advance to its present/current position in the SS?

Saturn and all of the planets are arranged based on their charge/physical characteristics with respect to the Sun.

@jonesdave.

^^^^^^Err, yes, I think I might have covered that in a degree once upon a time. I don't need telling, and I doubt anybody else does, either. The contention of the EU loons is that this all happened a few thousand years ago, and was recorded in mythology, which they have horribly misinterpreted.

Yes mate. That's why I suggested you ignore irrelevant religious overlays/claims, and just concentrate on discussing the relevant science.

It then would become apparent that the scientific aspects of @cantdrive's claims re re-locations/re-orientations, captures/losses etc during earlier planetary dynamics (over whatever epoch and via whatever mechanism: ie, gravity and/or electric), is scientifically valid and tenable. Maeaning that Ojorf's and your ridiculing of @cantdrive's whole post is like "throwing out the baby with the bath water" if you just ridicule instead of acknowledging what is correct science while ridiculing the irrelevant religious crap. Yes? :)

You missed that "dark" boat, mate! :)

We have dark mode plasma, the biggest difference is dark mode plasma is actually real.

AGAIN, WARNING: HUMOR FOLLOWS. So please don't anyone blow a gasket over this. OK? :)

@cantdrive85.

You missed that "dark" boat, mate! :)

We have dark mode plasma, the biggest difference is dark mode plasma is actually real.

Ahhh, but you didn't 'trademark' it, did you! That was your first mistake; it allowed the 'dark' BB/Inflation/DE/'exotic' DM 'crowd' to GAZUMP you and 'corner' the 'dark prefix' market!

Speaking of 'prefix markets', these "dark" prefix gazumpers have lately been trying to gazump everyone on the "exotic" prefix when attributing 'dark properties' to 'dark matter' will-of-the-wisps. Missed that 'exotic' boat too, mate! A bit too slow to realize 'the next big fad' in 'dark/exotic mainstream' theoretical/mathematical 'explanations/excuses', aren't you? :)

Maeaning that Ojorf's and your ridiculing of @cantdrive's whole post is like "throwing out the baby with the bath water" if you just ridicule instead of acknowledging what is correct science while ridiculing the irrelevant religious crap. Yes? :)

Do you ever listen? Their whole frigging cult is built on this idiotic idea that, within human memory, Earth orbited Saturn in a polar configuration, no less, and that Venus was spat out of Jupiter at the same epoch. Now, if you think that is believable, you have even less brains than I credited you with. Nobody is talking about 'the grand tack', billions of years ago, happening over many millions of years. We weren't around to record that! If the EU loons were right, Earth and the Moon would not have been captured - they'd have been thrown out of the solar system.

Err, yes, I think I might have covered that in a degree once upon a time.

What is the cut-off time for these events to be possible? Why are these events not possible in the current Universe? For what reason are these events only possible "billions of years ago"?

happened a few thousand years ago, and was recorded in mythology,

If there weren't common archetypes from all corners of the Earth that corroborated these myths/religions with a unified thread then it wouldn't hold water. All of the inhabitants of Earth from this era recorded the same events, they had to have seen the same phenomena. It had to to occur in the "heavens" for all to record the same events.

We have dark mode plasma, the biggest difference is dark mode plasma is actually real.

Guess what? That is an archaic term that used to be used for some plasmas that could not be seen in visible light in the lab. They are as detectable as any other type of plasma by spectrometry etc.

What is the cut-off time for these events to be possible? Why are these events not possible in the current Universe? For what reason are these events only possible "billions of years ago"?

It is nothing to do with 'cut off' time. It is the amount of time this is all supposed to have happened in! And when it happened. And how it happened. It is total nonsense. Ask anybody that understands the science. Same with the loony Venus nonsense. Pure woo.

@jonesdave.

Meaning that Ojorf's and your ridiculing of @cantdrive's whole post is like "throwing out the baby with the bath water" if you just ridicule instead of acknowledging what is correct science while ridiculing the irrelevant religious crap.

Now, if you think that is believable, you have even less brains than AI credited you with. Nobody is talking about 'the grand tack', billions of years ago, happening over many millions of years. We weren't around to record that! If the EU loons were right, Earth and the Moon would not have been captured - they'd have been thrown out of the solar system.

Where did you ever get the silly idea that I 'believe' any religious crap, from anyone at all, mate? I merely take the time and trouble to try and help YOU stop yourself from becoming what you despise. Stop the personal feuds/insults. Just stick to correct/known science; leave out all emotional/hysterical sounding irrelevant nastiness. As true, sober scientists should.

All of the inhabitants of Earth from this era recorded the same events, they had to have seen the same phenomena. It had to to occur in the "heavens" for all to record the same events.

Only if you are crap at interpreting the mythology. Otherwise, it's woo.

Just stick to the correct/known science...................

And that is what I was doing, you supercilious prat.

Just for the hard of understanding, 'The Grand Tack' (which I'm not totally sold on) is hypothesised to have happened before the formation of the inner rocky planets. By definition it has to be. Because what happens if you send a gas giant hurtling in to 1 AU, when there are already planets at 1 AU, 0.7 AU and 1.5 AU? Yep, say goodbye to them.

@jonesdave.

Just stick to the correct/known science...................

And that is what I was doing, you supercilious prat.

Mate, it's better to be thought "supercilious" in the cause of trying to stop personal feuds/insults, than to again prove oneself "supercilious" by still resorting to personal feuds/insults as your above response demonstrates. Calm down. Do better at discerning 'friend' from 'foe', crank from non-crank, relevant science discourse from irrelevant personal feuding/insulting. OK? :)

@SEU

by enough grav. pull and the two bodies would have merged,

...Electromagnetic principles are the prime drivers of these interactions.

IF you are saying that Saturn was in its present orbit

No, Saturn was its own system. So too with the Sun, two systems. They came too close to one another, their "wires crossed". Saturn was captured electromagnetically by the Sun.

how was Saturn able to advance to its present/current position in the SS?

Saturn and all of the planets are arranged based on their charge/physical characteristics with respect to the Sun.

says CD85

So, are you saying that Saturn had its own SS while the Sun existed simultaneously as a separate SS? Did the Sun have its own planets, and if it did, what happened to those?

-CONT'D-

-CONTINUED-
Also, is it possible that Saturn had planets orbiting it that were somehow destroyed and became the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter, but were not the 4 inner planets of the Sun as you believe?
I agree that electromagnetism and gravitational pull could possibly work in tandem to move young planetary bodies around and into orbit, as long as they are initially far enough away from their star until they become tidally locked or are able to revolve on their axis.
What is confusing is how would Saturn have planets while the Sun had no planets ~5BYA when the Sun is so much larger than Saturn. There seems to be a huge discrepancy.
But I repeat - there were no life forms living on Earth in that epoch, and thousands of Earth years ago, the Earth and Moon had already been 'In situ' for billions of years.
My opinion is that you and Benni should reform your thinking and utilise your keen sense of logic and reason to arrive at a better conclusion re Saturn.

That was your first mistake; it allowed the 'dark' BB/Inflation/DE/'exotic' DM 'crowd' to GAZUMP you and 'corner' the 'dark prefix' market!

My market is in the Light of Scientific Truth. Those who want to pander darkness, deception, and pseudoscience can do so at their own peril and legacy.

"The biggest people with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the smallest people with the smallest minds, think big anyway!"
Hedy Lamarr

@RealityCheck & jonesdave
Just wondering. Do you regard yourselves as 'Aussies'? If you do, then I presume that your ancestors arrived in Australia aboard a prison ship from England. You see, the ONLY people of Australia who have the absolute RIGHT to call themselves Aussies are those whose ancestors were arrested in England, loaded aboard a prison ship and sailed to Australia as convicts - men and women. Even if you have Aborigine ancestry also, you are NOT an Aussie unless at least one of your forefathers was a convict. It is an exclusive club, I might add, and newer arrivals from England/GB do not qualify. England had formerly been sending their convicts to America, mainly to the state of Alabama where many died. They were forbidden to send anymore convicts to America during and after the American Revolutionary War. So they were sent to Australia.
Interesting bit of history, yes?

Just wondering. Do you regard yourselves as 'Aussies'?

Hell no. Why would I?

What is confusing is how would Saturn have planets while the Sun had no planets

I have a thousand characters and limited time, what are ya gonna do?
The Sun obviously had planets. Mercury and the Moon are two prime candidates given their similar morphology. Most of the other gas giants were likely already part of the system given they too were identified in myth but as smaller players. Then again, there have been several tumultuous eras in human history which could possibly be due to stellar/planetary capture. Also, just as Venus appears to be a very "new" planet, so too does Titan exhibit some of these characteristics. In the EU view, planets do not coalesce out of a cloud per the standard theory, they are fused solid bodies "birthed" or expelled out of stars/gas giants.
Under the electrical stress of these events, new worlds may have been born of the electric arcs of these stars. There is a reason Venus' surface is at such an extreme temperature.

There is a reason Venus' surface is at such an extreme temperature.

Yep, 92 terrestrial atmospheres of mainly CO2!

That was your first mistake; it allowed the 'dark' BB/Inflation/DE/'exotic' DM 'crowd' to GAZUMP you and 'corner' the 'dark prefix' market!

My market is in the Light of Scientific Truth. Those who want to pander darkness, deception, and pseudoscience can do so at their own peril and legacy.

says CD85

I happen to agree that the "FILAMENTS" are that which are the connectors between stars AND galaxies, and that those filaments all carry the Electric Currents through them. I now think that the filaments have a lot of similarity to the communications medium within brains called 'Synapses' that enable one part of the brain to communicate with all others. So too, the filaments are elongated and are able to either lengthen or shorten to accommodate distances between stars/galaxies. I also believe that these filaments have a double usefulness, that of wormholes/tunnels which could enable an entity to travel from one galaxy to another without having to emerge.

But I repeat - there were no life forms living on Earth in that epoch, and thousands of Earth years ago

Human testimony would suggest otherwise.

Yep, 92 terrestrial atmospheres of mainly CO2!

The surface is emanating heat beyond what the atmosphere can explain. Your runaway greenhouse effect is bollocks.

Whatever floats your boat, as they say.
Part of my reason for coming to such conclusions as I have mentioned above, is that the picture in the link that I provided shows such filaments that connect stars and galaxies. It immediately reminded me of a portion of a brain where the synapses are firing while connecting neurons. To me, it is positively beautiful as well as logical - and it WORKS.

Yep, 92 terrestrial atmospheres of mainly CO2!

The surface is emanating heat beyond what the atmosphere can explain. Your runaway greenhouse effect is bollocks.

Nope, it isn't. And you will fail to back up that claim with science. As usual.

I happen to agree that the "FILAMENTS" are that which are the connectors between stars AND galaxies, and that those filaments all carry the Electric Currents through them.

Good for you. You can join the club of precisely zero sane scientists who would agree with you, due to there being zero evidence for such a thing. And there would be.

I now think that the filaments have a lot of similarity to the communications medium within brains called 'Synapses' that enable one part of the brain to communicate with all others.

The scalability of electromagnetism on display. Rupert Sheldrake has done some work on "Universal Knowledge", transmission of knowledge may be transmitted via the Morphic Fields.
https://www.sheld...oduction

Just wondering. Do you regard yourselves as 'Aussies'?

Hell no. Why would I?

says daveyjones

As I said, I was just wondering.

And you will fail to back up that claim with science.

https://www.space...ure.html
"The average temperature on Venus is 864 degrees Fahrenheit (462 degrees Celsius). Temperature changes slightly traveling through the atmosphere, growing cooler farther away from the surface. Lead would melt on the surface of the planet, where the temperature is around 872 F (467 C)."

Just a modicum of common sense would tell one the surface is the source of the heat, per thermodynamics.

And you will fail to back up that claim with science.

https://www.space...ure.html
"The average temperature on Venus is 864 degrees Fahrenheit (462 degrees Celsius). Temperature changes slightly traveling through the atmosphere, growing cooler farther away from the surface. Lead would melt on the surface of the planet, where the temperature is around 872 F (467 C)."

Just a modicum of common sense would tell one the surface is the source of the heat, per thermodynamics.

Wrong. If the heat were from the surface there would be convection in the atmosphere. There isn't. There is on Earth, as our surface is heated by the Sun. However, very little sunlight makes it to Venus' surface. And if the surface of Venus were molten only a few thousand years ago, it would likely still be molten. And it isn't. So, it must have cooled hellishly quickly to have a crust thick enough to support the sort of surface relief we see there.

I happen to agree that the "FILAMENTS" are that which are the connectors between stars AND galaxies, and that those filaments all carry the Electric Currents through them.

Good for you. You can join the club of precisely zero sane scientists who would agree with you, due to there being zero evidence for such a thing. And there would be.

says daveyjones

Have you invested heavily in what YOU believe as 'settled science'? A science that can never change according to new discoveries is a dead science. These filaments, I am certain, are being examined, explored, theorised/hypothesised and investigated to find out their exact compositions and their functions. Is it possible that you and others with your frame of mind are waiting for phys.org to produce an article favoring Electric Currents/filaments as scientific fact?
I am not ready to "join the club" and prefer to learn more about it in the meantime.

And if the surface of Venus were molten only a few thousand years ago,

Strawman alert, you need to stop imposing your own beliefs, you're fooling yourself.

Just wondering. Do you regard yourselves as 'Aussies'?

Hell no. Why would I?

says daveyjones

As I said, I was just wondering.

He's a New Zealander. He spent one year at the University in Auckland. He won't tell us why he only spent one year there, but it would be safe to presume it was because he couldn't cut it.

I now think that the filaments have a lot of similarity to the communications medium within brains called 'Synapses' that enable one part of the brain to communicate with all others.

The scalability of electromagnetism on display. Rupert Sheldrake has done some work on "Universal Knowledge", transmission of knowledge may be transmitted via the Morphic Fields.
https://www.sheld...oduction

Is that Zordon's tech? morphing fields?
Sorry, CD but it is too funny to pass up on! It's morphing time!

@Benni the freaky forum stalker

For the record - and I have asked - no-one on the whole internet would deliberately choose to tell you which hemisphere they lived in with your creepy, stalker behaviour that has been going on for years now.

In fact, only 1% would not consider saying they were in a secret government program to colonize mars in order to escape your attention.

That 1% were dying later today so were willing to run the risk.....no...just got an email from them. They've changed their mind. They're not willing to ruin their last day being covered in duct tape in the back of your panel van, they'd lie to you too.

Just wondering. Do you regard yourselves as 'Aussies'?

Hell no. Why would I?

says daveyjones

As I said, I was just wondering.

He's a New Zealander. He spent one year at the University in Auckland. He won't tell us why he only spent one year there, but it would be safe to presume it was because he couldn't cut it.

Wrong and wrong, weirdo. It takes a minimum of 3 years to get a degree, but you wouldn't know that. And where I was born has nothing to do with where I was educated, or where I live now. However, by the grace of whichever gods that do or do not exist, I am pretty sure it is nowhere near where you live. Which would be a good thing, if they are letting people who don't understand what radioactivity is within stones throw of nuclear power plants!

And if the surface of Venus were molten only a few thousand years ago,

Strawman alert, you need to stop imposing your own beliefs, you're fooling yourself.

Really, woo boy? So, show us the calculations that have been done to account for a planet, with a rocky surface, being thrown out of a gas giant composed mainly of H and He. At what temperature does the H and He solidify to form basalt? The only people being fooled here, are the scientifically challenged loons that believe in this physics defying idiocy.

EDIT:
Or perhaps the basalt was already in existence at Jupiter?

These filaments, I am certain, are being examined, explored, theorised/hypothesised and investigated to find out their exact compositions and their functions.

Correct, and there is a whole load of literature on it. Try reading some of it.

These filaments, I am certain, are being examined, explored, theorised/hypothesised and investigated to find out their exact compositions and their functions.

Correct, and there is a whole load of literature on it. Try reading some of it.

says jones

I intend to. However, I find it fascinating the idea of a protoplanet having been ejected/exploded out of the Sun ~5BYA. During that epoch the Sun was still young enough to be in flux, enough to be so volatile and energetic with large flares repeatedly coming out of it in vast explosions of hot gases. Such flares have not occurred for hundreds of millions of years at least. I am referring to the type of flare that could reach where Earth is now - and beyond. It is possible that the Sun ejected a giant flare that reached Earth's current location. It would have been in the form of a gas ejecta gathering dust from the surrounding dust as it left the corona.
-CONTINUE

-CONTINUED-
As it moved out of and away from the Sun it would have become molten as it cooled. After traveling a long distance it was held from going further by the Sun's grav. pull and CD's Electromagnetic Field.
CD85 has said: 'In the EU view, planets do not coalesce out of a cloud per the standard theory, they are fused solid bodies "birthed" or expelled out of stars/gas giants. "
I disagree with the "fused solid bodies" , They do not take that form until long after its "birth" and at a very long distance from the Sun where outer space is cold enough that the protoplanet congeals, attracts more dust while enlarging into a planet with a Magnetic Field. The core, outer core, lower mantle and part of the upper mantle are still hot, which is the reason why Earth has a Magnetic Field at all. Venus and Mars are said to have no molten core, thereby having no magnetic field. I can't say that I agree totally with the EU view. But I do favor Electric Current/Filaments between stars.

But I do favor Electric Current/Filaments between stars.

Good. Then you should be able to find the evidence for them in short order. Start with synchrotron radiation, WMAP, Planck & COBE. Let us know what you find.

Start with synchrotron radiation, WMAP, Planck...etc

SEU,
Look up Gerrit Vershuur and in regards to jonesdumb's challenge, he explains this in detail. And as Wal Thornhill has mentioned;
"If Arp and others are right and the Big Bang is dead, what does the Cosmic Microwave Background signify? The simplest answer, from the highly successful field of plasma cosmology, is that it represents the natural microwave radiation from electric current filaments in interstellar plasma local to the Sun. Radio astronomers have mapped the interstellar hydrogen filaments by using longer wavelength receivers. The dense thicket formed by those filaments produces a perfect fog of microwave radiation—as if we were located inside a microwave oven. Instead of the Cosmic Microwave Background, it is the Interstellar Microwave Background. That makes sense of the fact that the CMB is too smooth to account for the lumpiness of galaxies and galactic clusters in the Universe."

And as Wal Thornhill has mentioned;

And who is Wal Thornhill, and why would anybody listen to him? Should I link to more of his idiotic beliefs, just to prove that he is totally clueless?

@CD & jd
My above comment(s) were made after trying to draw some sort of logical and reasonable conclusion wrt the way and method that a small piece of aggregate could evolve and come into existence as a protoplanet floating in a dusty and gassy environment far from a local Star, regardless of the timeframe for it to accomplish its growth spurt. It seems to me that that small piece would not have much luck attracting enough gas and dust to itself in the right amounts that would provide it with a molten core and a Magnetic Field/Polarities/Spin, and would possibly remain a small piece of aggregate forever - unless it was attracted to and taken up by a Star. Otherwise, small pieces would likely collide with each other and smash and turn into dusty particles. Perhaps this sort of thing happens in other Star systems where there are no planets evident, whether gassy or rocky, of whatever size and composition.

-CONTINUED-
@CD85
Interstellar Microwave Background sounds too limiting. How about Intergalactic Microwave Background?
Perhaps I err in my judgement, but to me, the theory that planets evolve merely by drawing in/attracting small and large pieces of dust and gas to itself and somehow manage to self-create a molten core almost as hot as the coolest part of the Sun, seems unattainable. And why isn't it happening NOW? I suppose it MAY be possible if its first layers are of hotly radioactive dust/elements that remain mostly in the center of the planet with occasional forays to the surface in the form of volcanoes/magma. The circulation of magma in the core enables life to exist on the surface of Earth.
But the idea of a young Sun, fully active and volatile, spewing out radioactive flares millions of miles from itself that creates planetary bodies, does seem very possible. As for the Sun pulling Saturn closer to itself, it just doesn't seem possible.

Start with synchrotron radiation, WMAP, Planck...etc

SEU,
Look up Gerrit Vershuur and in regards to jonesdumb's challenge, he explains this in detail. And as Wal Thornhill has mentioned;
... Instead of the Cosmic Microwave Background, it is the Interstellar Microwave Background. That makes sense of the fact that the CMB is too smooth to account for the lumpiness of galaxies and galactic clusters in the Universe."

says CD85

My own estimation is that the CMBR is a transmitter of information...a conduit, if you will, that is a type of algorithm that also allows/prevents chaos/glitches in the Universe. It is programmable and the Developer/Programmer is that of whom most scientists and phys.org commenters deny exists.

Remember, you read it here first.

Furthermore, the CMBR IS EVERYWHERE in the Universe. The Five Senses that Homo Sapiens/Animals enjoys can only exist and are usable because the CMBR EXISTS. It assists in transmitting information so that you can see, hear, touch, smell and taste.