New study explores cell mechanics at work
It's a remarkable choreography. In each of our bodies, more than 37 trillion cells tightly coordinate with other cells to organize into the numerous tissues and organs that make us tick.
"A few years ago, the NCI initiated this challenge within the framework of the Physical Sciences in Oncology (PSOC) Network, and several labs in the U.S. and Europe were invited to participate," said ASU researcher Robert Ros, director of ASU's Center for Biological Physics and a faculty in the Department of Physics and the Biodesign Institute's Center for Single Molecule Biophysics.
Ros is an expert within an emerging science devoted toward a better understanding of the routine mechanical and physical forces cells may be subjected to in the body.
These forces include cells rafting through river rapid-like currents of circulating blood or mosh-pit clumps of crowded neighbor cells within tissues and organs that all serve to bend, push, compress, shear or deform them.
And so, an international team made up of researchers from eight different labs got to work, including: Arizona State University (Robert Ros, and ASU graduate students who performed the experiments at the time, Jack Staunton and Bryant Doss), Johns Hopkins University, University of Pennsylvania, Tufts University, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the National Cancer Institute, the University of Paris-Diderot, the Technical University of Dresden and Saarland University in Germany.
Together, they rolled up their sleeves to better understand the physical forces and how best to optimize available technology. They wanted to compare different common techniques and understand the differences in the results of those techniques.
The force within us
In the study, the team focused on measuring the stiffness, bending, twisting and viscosity of individual cells -focused on a breast cancer cell line—-using all of the most state-of-the art technology at their disposal.
How both healthy and cancerous cells respond to this environment —-and whether there are key differences that can be identified for future diagnostic applications was of keen interest to both the NCI and the physicists taking on the NCI's challenge.
"All labs received from NCI the same cells (known as MCF-7 breast cancer cells) and we agreed on similar conditions for the measurements," added Ros.
But before making their measurements, they first had to ensure that all the subtle conditions of growing cells in the lab were the same, including temperature, acidity of the solution, or how long they had been growing.
"We obtained the measurements from a total of six techniques in eight different laboratories using the same breast cells from the same lot, cultured in the same medium from the same lot, all directly provided by the same tissue culture cell bank," said Ros.
In total, the research team employed six different technologies to apply mechanical forces to the cells across a number of scales, from within a single cell to whole cells to a single cell layer. Also important to the team was how fast they could make the measurements, which varied from processing a few cells to more than 2,000 every hour.
More to the surface
Three of these groups, including Ros' focused on an instrument to make cell mechanical measurements that often represents the eyes of nanotechnology, called Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).
AFMs are a commercially available tool widely used in nanotechnology, and fairly easy to use.
AFMs are so sensitive, they can see down to the level of individual atoms, and for the study, the mechanical forces within the cell. An AFM probe, which is like a record player arm and a type of cone-shaped needle, can apply a force on the surface of a single cell and measure the deformation.
The probes can be interchanged to measure the cellular forces at different scales.
"Overall, our results highlighted how mechanical properties of cells can vary by orders of magnitude, depending on the length scale at which cell viscoelasticity is probed, from tens of nanometers (e.g., the diameter of an AFM tip) to several micrometers (the size of a whole cell)," said Ros.
"Our measurement with a nanoscale AFM probe showed that the mechanical properties of cells are heterogeneous and vary considerably at a single cell and from cell to cell," said Ros. "Together, these results show that the mechanical properties of cells measured by AFM can differ more than tenfold, depending on the measurement parameters and the probed regions of the cells, as well as the dimension of the indenter."
Going with the flow
By applying a total of six different technologies, they could bend, push, twist and stretch cells in ways similar to what they may encounter within the body.
In addition to ASU's AFM technology, this also included an alphabet soup of technology: atomic force microscopy (AFM), magnetic twisting cytometry (MTC), particle-tracking microrheology (PTM), parallel-plate rheometry (PPR), cell monolayer rheology (CMR) and optical stretching (OS) (see figures).
They were particular encouraged when they saw similar results for each of the different techniques.
In addition, their latest results helped confirm data from previous studies, crossing an important scientific verification step—-that the measurements could be duplicated.
Opening new avenues
Moving forward, of interest to Ros' group is measuring these cellular mechanical forces within 3-D cell culture environments that can better mimic cells within the body.
"With this study, we've laid the groundwork that our results are more likely to be due to the differential mechanical responses of cells to the different force profiles produced by these different methods, rather than just random errors," said Ros.
They will continue to explore different types of cells in different environments to see if there is a mechanical force that can be a new type of cell "signature" which may lead to a brand, new type of diagnostic tool.