Only 1 pct of Japan's biggest coral reef healthy: survey

May 18, 2018
Coral reefs are home to a vast range of marine life

Japan's biggest coral reef has not recovered from bleaching due to rising sea temperatures, with only one percent of the reef in a healthy condition, according to a government study.

The overall volume of in Sekisei Lagoon in southwestern Japan near Okinawa had already plunged by 80 percent since the late 1980s due to rising and damage caused by coral-eating starfish.

Now only 1.4 percent of the , which stretches over 67.89 square kilometres, is in a healthy condition, the environment ministry said, after it was hit by mass bleaching in 1998, 2001, 2007 and most recently 2016.

"If don't recover, it means a loss of rich fauna for a variety of creatures and would have grave impact on the ecosystem in the region," ministry official Chihiro Kondo told AFP on Friday.

For the first time since 2008, the ministry analysed satellite photos and information from some 1,000 monitoring sites for the Sekisei Lagoon and two other reefs around the Ishigaki and Iriomote islets in Okinawa.

The ratio of healthy corals stood at 14.6 percent in 1991 but dropped to 0.8 percent in the 2008 survey, Kondo said.

Two other neighbouring lagoons had similar results with the ratio of healthy areas around one percent.

Bleaching occurs when abnormal environmental conditions, such as warmer , cause corals to expel tiny photosynthetic algae, draining them of their colour.

Corals can recover if the water temperature drops and the algae are able to recolonise them.

"But the latest study shows that corals haven't recovered much since 2008, presumably partly because of the 2016 bleach," Kondo said.

One of the worst mass bleaching episodes on record took place in 1998 when the El Nino phenomenon was exceptionally strong, affecting reefs in 60 tropical countries.

Coral reefs are also under pressure from ocean acidification linked to CO2 emissions, scientists warn.

Corals make up less than one percent of Earth's marine environment, but are home to more than 25 percent of marine life.

Explore further: Cold water devastates coral reefs off Japan: survey

Related Stories

In the Seychelles, coral reefs face climate change threat

March 19, 2018

Beneath the crystal-clear waters of the Indian Ocean island nation of the Seychelles, a fight is growing to save the coral reefs that shelter a range of creatures, from tiny invertebrates to the sprawling octopus, from climate ...

World's northernmost coral reef in Japan bleached

July 18, 2017

Bleaching has damaged the world's northernmost coral reef in Japan, a researcher said Tuesday, the latest example of a global phenomenon scientists have attributed to high ocean temperatures.

Recommended for you

Afromontane forests and climate change

January 17, 2019

In the world of paleoecology, little has been known about the historical record of ecosystems in the West African highlands, especially with regard to glacial cycles amidst a shifting climate and their effects on species ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.5 / 5 (8) May 18, 2018
Fake News
4.4 / 5 (5) May 18, 2018
Fake News

Why do you say that, do you have any evidence to the contrary?
1 / 5 (3) May 18, 2018
So what was the "actual" rise in sea temperature in the oceans of Japan?
1.8 / 5 (5) May 20, 2018
A change of 2 C doesn't kill coral and neither does 3 millionths % change of ocean acidity hurt coral. It is adaptable. So instead of conjecture this charlatan should do some real research to identify the cause.

5 / 5 (2) May 21, 2018
3 millionths % change of ocean acidity
The pH scale is proportional to the log of the hydrogen ion (or hydronium) concentration, so even a very minor change in pH represents a large change in the relative concentration. Your number is so very suspiciously small that unless you provide a citation to a legitimate peer-reviewed paper, we have to assume that you are a liar.
1 / 5 (2) May 21, 2018

"very minor change in pH represents a large change in the relative concentration. " no you moron! Only if increasing from billionths to millionths is relatively large.

Instead of stressing your brain calling names, verify it for yourself by doing the math. If alkalinity decreases from 8.3 to 8.2 then how many +H have you added per mole? Being a log scale you can do.

You don't need a citation for basic math and chemistry.

Further would such +H change effect the reaction rate with calcium carbonate in any
appreciable amount? NO Proof +H increases greatly with latitude yet calcium carbonate is still created. It is very easy to see the effect of this if you aren't one hell of a d*mb a*s.
Captain Stumpy
2.3 / 5 (3) May 21, 2018
no you moron! Only if increasing from billionths to millionths is relatively large.

Instead of stressing your brain calling names, verify it for yourself by doing the math
1- hypocrite

2- your perception of reality and your percieved superiority in maths does not trump observed, validated science, especially when it's supported by experimentation;btnG=

3- just because you're an anti-AGW pseudoscience advocate doesn't mean you have any shred of evidence, otherwise you could publish a refute to the paper and get rich off the current idiots who deny the science

4- science works both ways. if you have a valid means to prove your argument you wouldn't be here on a news aggregate attempting to sway the reader to your perspective.

those last two points are relevant

argument from belief or D-K doesn't mean you're correct
it means you don't believe in reality

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.