Neutrons measured with unprecedented precision using a 'magneto-gravitational trap'

May 10, 2018, Indiana University
The UNCtau 'bottle' trap. A combination of magnetic fields and gravity prevent neutrons from escaping the container. Credit: Los Alamos National Laboratory

A study led in part by physicists at the Indiana University Center for the Exploration of Energy and Matter could provide new insight into the composition of the universe immediately after the Big Bang—as well as improve calculations used to predict the life span of stars and describe the rules that govern the subatomic world.

The study, published May 11 in the journal Science, reports a highly accurate way to measure the decay rate of neutrons. An author on the study, Chen-Yu Liu, is a professor in the IU Bloomington College of Arts and Sciences' Department of Physics.

"This is a significant improvement compared to previous experiments," said Liu, who is a leader on the UNCtau experiment, which uses neutrons from the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center Ultracold Neutron source at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. "The data is far more accurate than what we've had before."

The rate of the decay of neutrons—subatomic particles with no charge—is significant because it is used to predict the proportion of hydrogen and helium in the universe a few minutes after the Big Bang. The number also affects calculations used to determine how quickly hydrogen atoms burn up inside stars and the rules that control the elementary particles like quarks and gluons. This is because during neutron decay, one "up" quark transforms into a "down" quark, a process that physicists don't yet fully understand.

Scientists currently use two methods to isolate neutrons and calculate their decay rates:

  • The "bottle" method: Counting the number of neutrons that remain over time after being trapped inside a container.
  • The "beam" method: Measuring the rate of protons that emerge from a neutron beam generated by a nuclear reactor.
Chris Cude, who was an undergraduate student at IU Bloomington at the time of the study, looks at the neutron detector of the UNCtau experiment. The device gives off a green light when neutrons interact with it. Credit: IU Center for Spacetime Symmetries

Some physicists regard the beam method as more accurate because the bottle method risks miscounting neutrons absorbed into the container as disappearing from decay. But the study from Liu and colleagues uses an invisible container made from magnetic fields and gravity to eliminate the risk of interference from physical material. As a result, the experiment can measure a neutron's lifetime with a high level of precision.

"A neutron could technically live inside our trap for three weeks, which is much longer than any other previously constructed 'bottle' traps," Liu said. "This long trap lifetime is what makes it possible to achieve a highly accurate measurement."

The use of a "magneto-gravitational trap," in which the neutrons' magnetic charge and mass prevent them from escaping their container, also makes it easier to measure the neutrons because the bottle is "lidless," Liu said.

Liu's lab joined the UNCtau experiment in 2011 to help re-invigorate the project. The work required five years to design, fabricate, test and install their equipment at the neutron source in Los Alamos, after which the team began to run experiments and collect data. Members of Liu's lab regularly travel to New Mexico to test equipment, run experiments and record the results.

"Five years to get an experiment running and producing data is very fast in our field," Liu said. "We spent about six months on site and six months creating hardware each year. It was really a cycle of fast prototyping and improvement. We would never have been able to renovate the technology without the mechanical and technical support available at the IU Center for the Exploration of Energy and Matter."

Explore further: Neutron lifetime measurements take new shape for in situ detection

More information: R. W. Pattie et al. Measurement of the neutron lifetime using a magneto-gravitational trap and in situ detection, Science (2018). DOI: 10.1126/science.aan8895

Related Stories

New record at ultracold neutron source in Mainz

January 15, 2018

Some 10 years ago, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) entered a new field of research by starting to generate ultracold neutrons (UCN) for use in fundamental research in physics. The participating physicists and chemists ...

Toward new precision in measuring the neutron lifetime

February 5, 2014

( —A team of PML scientists, with collaborators elsewhere, has achieved a five-fold reduction in the dominant uncertainty in an experiment that measured the mean lifetime of the free neutron (exceptionally long ...

New method extracts neutrons from superfluid helium

September 21, 2007

“There are many applications for ultracold neutrons in fundamental physics,” Oliver Zimmer tells “And we will find even more applications with a stronger source of ultracold neutrons.” Zimmer, a scientist ...

Recommended for you

CMS gets first result using largest-ever LHC data sample

February 15, 2019

Just under three months after the final proton–proton collisions from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)'s second run (Run 2), the CMS collaboration has submitted its first paper based on the full LHC dataset collected in ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) May 10, 2018
What makes you think their not just collecting a positive charged particle and turning into a wave particle construction
5 / 5 (4) May 10, 2018
I can see where the accuracy of this method degrades with various factors including trap size, hold times, etc., but the resolution accuracy increases as the neutron population grows. For this reason I anticipate this method of measurement becoming much more accurate over time, as the number of neutrons held in the trap improves with new technology.

Consider the growth in the number of atoms held in Bose-Einstein condensates as a historical parallel.
5 / 5 (8) May 10, 2018
What makes you think their not just collecting a positive charged particle and turning into a wave particle construction

Because unlike you they know what they are talking about.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet May 10, 2018
There is ONE interactive factor that can't be avoided with this method - exposure the magnetic fields...
1 / 5 (3) May 11, 2018
like most scholars, are pupils who were educated in "elementary school Einstein" and had their deity BB, to which they still believe today.
5 / 5 (4) May 11, 2018

Ummm they are exactly collecting a positive charged particle ... the only way to detect neutron decay is to wait for it to decay into a proton and then be attracted to the collector. What you are implying is that is wasn't a tight vacuum to begin with and they don't account for noise, which i figure the smart people would do.
not rated yet May 11, 2018
like most scholars, are pupils who were educated in "elementary school Einstein" and had their deity BB, to which they still believe today.

I take it that you weren't educated in "elementary school Einstein"???
1 / 5 (1) May 11, 2018
What makes you think their not just collecting a positive charged particle and turning into a wave particle construction

OK English might not be your first language, so consider this as helpful advice:
"...makes you think their not just collecting..." is wrong.
"...makes you think they're not just collecting..." is right.
not rated yet May 11, 2018
I'm running away from these "primary schools of Einstein", and you have also completed "Einstein's faculty"

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.