Disenfranchisement study impacts new voting rights laws

Disenfranchisement study impacts new voting rights laws
A June 2010 brief cites Professor Holona Ochs’ research on voter disenfranchisement—specifically a paper she had published in The Policy Studies Journal called “‘Colorblind’ Policy in Black and White: Racial Consequences of Disenfranchisement Policy.” Credit: iStock/Steve Debenport

In March of this year, Washington State Governor Jay Inslee signed the Washington Voting Rights Act into law. The state's Voting Rights Act says that a jurisdiction is in violation of the law "…where there is a significant risk members of a protected class do not have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of choice as a result of dilution or abridgement of their rights."

The law was many years in the making—and Holona Ochs, associate professor of political science, was, unknowingly, a key part of the fight.

Och's research on voter disenfranchisement was cited in an early challenge to a previous state law that provided that convicted felons lost the right to vote upon conviction, and did not have that right restored upon release until all fees, restitution or other legal financial obligations were met.

The complainants in the case, known as Farrakhan v. Gregoire, said this was a violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because minorities were disproportionately prosecuted and sent to prison, and revoking their right to vote disenfranchised them. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color or membership in one of the language minority groups identified in Section 4(f)(2) of the Act.

A June 2010 brief cites Ochs' research on voter disenfranchisement—specifically a paper she had published in The Policy Studies Journal called "'Colorblind' Policy in Black and White: Racial Consequences of Disenfranchisement Policy." In it she demonstrates "…that disenfranchisement laws have a disparate impact on the black community that becomes increasingly disproportionate as disenfranchisement laws increase in severity." She also finds "…that disenfranchisement policies have a significant independent effect on voting rights in the black community and do not have a similar effect on white voters." Ochs concludes "…that the ability of the black community to achieve adequate representation is substantially diminished as fewer and fewer black qualify for voter registration."

"I essentially demonstrated that the existing research already established racial intent and demonstrated statistically that there is a disparate impact despite the 'colorblind' nature of a given policy," says Ochs.

Farrakhan v. Gregoire moved slowly through the state court system and did not, ultimately, prevail. However, the lawsuit, along with other efforts, set the stage for the voting reform efforts that became the Washington Voter Rights Act.

Now, under the Act, a person may lose the right to vote when convicted of a felony in adult court. This right is restored, however, when a person is no longer under the authority of the Department of Corrections (DOC). A person's right to vote is restored automatically, even if they still owe fines, restitution, or other legal financial obligations (LFOs).

"The makeup of the Washington State Legislature led to the passage of laws built on this case and others," says Ochs. "A statehouse friendly to extending franchise within the current political context saw the opportunity and took it."


Explore further

Economic crisis could stop citizens from voting: research

More information: Holona Leanne Ochs. "Colorblind" Policy in Black and White: Racial Consequences of Disenfranchisement Policy, Policy Studies Journal (2006). DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00146.x
Provided by Lehigh University
Citation: Disenfranchisement study impacts new voting rights laws (2018, May 21) retrieved 25 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-05-disenfranchisement-impacts-voting-rights-laws.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
6 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 21, 2018
Among other things, note the reference to "protected" classes. Doesn't the government exist to protect all citizens? Setting individuals aside for special treatment indicates they don't provide the basis for it, others who earned the resources protecting the others are having that taken from them!
And the perennial fraud of saying a system must necessarily be "racist" if it disadvantages blacks. It can't be that blacks are universally less capable of learning, it can't be that they are more inherently violent, it can't be that they are more inclined to crime. It has, in fact, never, ever been proved that they are equal to whites in things like that, but it is demanded by the lie machine of "science" that those ideas never be accepted. Instead, reasonable systems that act against ugly personality characteristics are denounced rather than admit that blacks largely, even all but universally, have them.

May 21, 2018
jp, you are just making the usual, tediously repetitious blame-the-victims-of-oppression. So common among the altright fairytails.

Your claim is that minorities deserve to be discriminated against to protect your sacred privileges. Entitlements you have not earned but insist are your personal property. Justified by successful theft and brutal suppression of the lawful original owners.

All the chatter by fake-libertarians and fake-conservatives espousing the drunken ramblings of that loon Ayn Rand. With deliberate sabotage of honest competition. And rigging both the economy and legal structure to maintain your tyranny.

To benefit sustaining the grotesque mummery of self-satisfied, pious hypocrisy of your tribal egotism above all others.

May 22, 2018
Black, white, brown, or even green with purple polka dots. It has been a problem for all people for a long time now. Once a person is free and clear there is no real reason they should be denied their voting rights or any other of their civil rights. Do some crime, go to jail, do your time and you are still punished for life. That just isn't right.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more