Team discovers a new take on early evolution of photosynthesis

April 24, 2018, Arizona State University
Arrangement of the cofactors in the HbRC, along with a possible position of the quinone cofactor, shown fit in the electron density of an unknown molecule (Gisriel et al., 2017). School of Molecular Sciences @ Arizona State University. Credit: Chris Gisriel

A team of scientists from Arizona State University's School of Molecular Sciences has begun re-thinking the evolutionary history of photochemical reaction centers (RCs). Their analysis was recently published online in Photosynthesis Research and describes a new pathway that ancient organisms may have taken to evolve the great variety of photosynthetic RCs seen today across bacteria, algae, and plants. The study will go into print later this summer in a special issue dedicated to photochemical reaction centers.

Photosynthesis is the process by which plants, algae and some bacteria use the energy from the sun to power their metabolism. Plants and algae use this to make sugars from water and carbon dioxide, releasing the oxygen that we breathe. But certain bacteria carry out a simpler form of photosynthesis that does not produce oxygen, and is believed to have evolved first.

The molecular engines in all photosynthetic organisms that convert light energy to chemical energy are called photochemical reaction centers. RCs are chlorophyll-containing proteins found in the cell membrane. Their first appearance and subsequent diversification has allowed photosynthesis to power the biosphere for over 3 billion years, in the process supporting the evolution of more complex life forms.

There are two types of RCs that exist today: Type I RCs support metabolism by moving electrons to soluble proteins, while Type II RCs move electrons to membrane-associated molecules. However, evidence has been building in the lab of professor Kevin Redding that the RC from the heliobacteria may be able to perform both of these functions, making it a functional hybrid of the two RC types.

The heliobacterial RC is thought to be one of the simplest RCs still around today. It is homodimeric, meaning that its core is composed of two copies of the same protein. This contrasts with the two RCs from oxygen-producing organisms like plants whose core is heterodimeric, having their core composed of two similar, but not identical, proteins.

It is believed that the RC arose only once during Earth's history, and that all the RCs around today are distantly related to that original ancestor. Over time, these RCs have changed to perform different chemistries. While the have changed a great deal, astonishingly, the overall structure of RCs has remained similar. The team believes that the ancestral reaction center (ARC) was simpler than the versions that exist today. This ARC was probably homodimeric and interacted with molecules in the membrane, like the modern Type II RCs (and the heliobacterial RC), instead of with soluble proteins.

It is very difficult to reconstruct these evolutionary steps, which took over 3 billion years to occur. One way in which this is generally done is to compare the amino acid sequences of the proteins and note the number of differences between them, assuming that more similarity means that they are more closely related. In their study, however, the team cautions against relying heavily on this method for RCs. The sequence differences are just too numerous and too much time has passed to obtain reliable information from this method.

They instead compared the positions of protein structural elements and chlorophylls within the RCs. In essence, they focused more on the structure and function of the RCs to reconstruct the , starting by making predictions about the ARC's structure and function.

Structural overlay

The team envisions that the ARC, in its simplest form, was probably rather inefficient at its chemistry. Its job was to use the energy of sunlight to provide two electrons to a membrane-associated molecule called a quinone. However, the ARC likely could loosely bind two quinone molecules, one on each side of the core. With two identical-looking quinones, the ARC was not able to prioritize which quinone would get electrons, making it less likely that either would get the two it needed.

This problem was solved in two different ways. In the lineage that led to the modern Type II RCs, the core changed from homodimeric to heterodimeric, which allowed the RC to prioritize which quinone it gave electrons to, accelerating the chemistry. In the lineage that led to the modern Type I RCs, the core remained homodimeric, but a metal cluster was added so that the first electron would end up there, facilitating its delivery to the quinone that received the next electron.

Once the ARC had acquired the metal cluster, thus becoming the ancestor to all modern Type I RCs, more changes occurred to further direct electrons to a soluble acceptor, which resulted in extracting more energy for the cell's metabolism. These included changes in the positions and identities of the chlorophyll cofactors. Much of the later changes in the Type I RCs were driven by the need to deal with the presence of oxygen, as the unstable intermediates within RCs can react with oxygen to generate very damaging molecules. In the opinion of the ASU team, the heliobacterial RC retains clear vestiges of the changes leading to the early Type I RC and that understanding the fine details in how modern RCs work allows for informed hypotheses about how they evolved.

Explore further: A new picture emerges on the origins of photosynthesis in a sun-loving bacteria

Related Stories

Team shines new light on photosynthesis

September 1, 2017

A team of scientists from ASU's School of Molecular Sciences and Pennsylvania State University has taken us a step closer to unlocking the secrets of photosynthesis, and possibly to cleaner fuels.

Recommended for you

How quinoa plants shed excess salt and thrive in saline soils

September 21, 2018

Barely heard of a couple of years ago, quinoa today is common on European supermarket shelves. The hardy plant thrives even in saline soils. Researchers from the University of Würzburg have now determined how the plant gets ...

Decoding the structure of an RNA-based CRISPR system

September 20, 2018

Over the past several years, CRISPR-Cas9 has moved beyond the lab bench and into the public zeitgeist. This gene-editing tool CRISPR-Cas9 holds promise for correcting defects inside individual cells and potentially healing ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

FredJose
1 / 5 (2) Apr 25, 2018
It is very difficult to reconstruct these evolutionary steps, which took over 3 billion years to occur.

Of course, if it is impossible for the ARC to come into existence all by itself via random biological ( or even worse, non-biological) processes, then the other variants might as well be dead in the water. There is absolutely no way to demonstrate HOW life could have arisen from random lifeless chemical events since life is so extremely highly ordered. There is in the same vein no way to demonstrate that so-called darwinian/single ancestor evolution can occur in real life. Whilst it may be relatively easier to demonstrate speciation, with actual traceable paths, demonstrating original transcendental offspring is pretty much beyond human capability. Except perhaps in highly assumptive computational models. In the same way there is no way for the researchers to substantiate their claim of an ancestral reaction center. That is just a pipe dream at this stage.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.