Swapping cars for shared bicycles could prevent up to 73 deaths per year

April 20, 2018, Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal)
Credit: Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal)

The 12 largest bicycle sharing systems in Europe offer health and economic benefits. Currently, the use of shared bicycles by people who previously used cars prevents five deaths and saves €18 million per year. If all public bicycle trips were made by previous car users, 73 deaths and €226 million would be saved every year. These are the conclusions of a new study by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal).

Bicycle sharing systems have become very popular in cities worldwide. In 2013, there were an estimated 500 services of this type around the planet. In Spain alone, there are almost 100, notably in Barcelona, with 6,000 bicycles or in Valencia or Seville, with 2,000 units each.

The study, published in Environment International, analysed the 12 most important sharing systems in Europe—all with more than 2,000 units—in six countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain). Nine have mechanical bicycles, two (Barcelona and Milan) combine electric and mechanical bikes, and one (Madrid) has only electric bikes. In fact, this is the first study to include the impact of .

Based on the Health Impact Assessment method developed by the researchers, they analysed the and risks of substituting car trips by trips on bicycles belonging to the shared systems. Using transport data, health surveys and registers of pollution and traffic accidents, they estimated the number of annual deaths due to lack of physical activity, , and (PM2.5 particles).

The study estimated the number of deaths avoided through a greater bicycle use. Electric bicycles, they conclude, also offer health benefits, although users get less physical activity and are more exposed to accidents at higher speeds.

Isabel Otero, ISGlobal researcher and first author of the study, says that the results show health benefits, particularly for mechanical bicycles, in all cities studied. "The positive health impacts are mainly due to an increase in ", she explains. "Thus, the benefits of cycling largely outweigh the risks, in any of the 12 European cities studied."

Of all cities analysed, Paris obtained the best results in terms of health benefits, with 2.5 lives saved per year. This is likely because it is the largest system in Europe, with more than 23,000 bicycles and 110,000 trips per day. In Barcelona, Bicing (mechanical and electrical) saves one death and 2.5 million euros every year.

"The real benefits could be even greater if local authorities worked to increase the number of bicycle trips per day, ensure traffic safety and improve air quality", says David Rojas, ISGlobal researcher and coordinator of the study. He encourages city authorities to focus efforts on this system given the health and , including lives saved.

Explore further: Cycling networks could prevent up to 10,000 premature deaths in European cities

More information: I. Otero et al, Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe, Environment International (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.014

Related Stories

Paris city bikes go electric

October 25, 2017

Ten years after Paris launched the wildly popular Velib bicycle-sharing scheme, the grey two-wheelers that have spawned imitators worldwide are getting a makeover.

Recommended for you

How a pair of satellites will 'weigh' water on Earth

May 22, 2018

The reason we know today just how much ice is melting in Greenland and Antarctica is because of a pair of satellites, launched in 2002 by NASA and the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ). Now, they are set to be ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Doug_Nightmare
not rated yet Apr 20, 2018
That relative death rate is a simplistic microscopic and one dimensional and static analysis.

Bicycling enables overall good health and longevity. Bicycle integrated infrastructure and integrated pollution is minescule compared to any subset of automobiles' integrated pollution.

For the disparate impacts of well being, electricaly powered (two-wheeled) devices must be separated from Human Powered Vehicles in analysis.
Anonym
1 / 5 (1) Apr 20, 2018
Cost-benefit ratio? You tell me (because this story doesn't even try). Daylight Savings Time kills more people semi-annually than this measure would save. We haven't repealed DST, so I have to believe there must be a positive cost-benefit to it.

Study does not quantify the amount of lost productivity due to the extra time required for a bicycle to travel, say, 15 miles at 10 mph, vs. a private car at 70 mph. But then, these sorts of studies never do that calculation. There is only place in America where public trans is more efficient than private --- NYC.

The USA is more productive than most countries thanks in large measure to the time saved by its workers, who self-finance their own transportation despite the expense. Why? Because it's way faster, way more convenient, and probably more healthful (because one is not sharing viruses with the other riders on the bus).
mrburns
not rated yet Apr 21, 2018
Most any collision will do a lot more damage to a bike rider than an occupant of a car. Most collisions don't result in any deaths. So using deaths as the measure of safety is dubious at best. This seems to be more politically motivated pseudo-science. It gets tiresome.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.