Asteroids and comets shower Mars with organics

Asteroids and comets shower Mars with organics
Cartoon of the planet Mars that is showered with organics. According to calculations, 33% of the organic material on Mars comes from asteroids and comets. Only 67% comes from interplanetary dust. Credit: Anastasia Kruchevska

Asteroids and comets appear to be a much more important supplier of organic molecules on Mars than expected. Until now, astronomers assumed that the organics on Mars mainly came from dust particles from space. Now, computer simulations by an international team of researchers led by Dutch astronomers indicate that one third of the material comes from asteroids and comets. The findings have been accepted for publication in the scientific journal Icarus.

In 2015, the Mars rover Curiosity discovered remnants of on Mars. Scientists wondered how these organic molecules had ended up on Mars. The prevailing theory was that the molecules were tied to . Those particles are everywhere. For example, around our earth we see the dust particles when they enter our atmosphere and cause "shooting stars."

An international team of researchers from SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, the University of Groningen, Utrecht University and the University of California Santa Barbara, suspected that the theory of the dust particles could not be the whole story. The scientists assumed that some of the organic molecules might be delivered by asteroids and comets. To investigate this, they built a computer model of our solar system including hundreds of thousands of asteroids and comets. Then they used Peregrine, the supercomputer of the University of Groningen, to run the computer model for a few weeks.

The calculations show that 192 tons of carbon per year end up on Mars. That is comparable to 8 truckloads. Approximately 129 tons (67 percent) of carbon come from interplanetary . But asteroids also deliver another 50 tons per year (26 percent) and comets provide about 13 tons (7 percent) of the organic material.

The research has consequences for future and current Mars missions. Mars rovers, according to the astronomers, should look closely at the impact craters of asteroids. In those places, a lot of could be found.

Furthermore, the research also has implications for the chance of life on exoplanets. The Groningen Ph.D. student Kateryna Frantseva, who led the research, explains: "Near other stars, there are also exo-asteroids and exocomets that can shower the surfaces of exoplanets with carbon. If, on top of that, there is water, then you have the required ingredients for life."

Now, the researchers focus on the planet Mercury, where water has been found. They want to estimate how much water on Mercury can be delivered by asteroids and comets. After that they want to extend their research to planetary systems around other stars.


Explore further

What is interplanetary dust and can it spread the ingredients of life?

More information: Kateryna Frantseva et al. Delivery of organics to Mars through asteroid and comet impacts, Icarus (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.03.006
Journal information: Icarus

Citation: Asteroids and comets shower Mars with organics (2018, March 14) retrieved 19 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-03-asteroids-comets-shower-mars.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
238 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 14, 2018
Since asteroids and comets are made up from the dust they thought was the prime contributor, is there a great deal of difference? I don't think the elemental composition or content will change dramatically when dust aggregates into asteroids and comets, The difference is that dust settles slowly and asteroids and comets come crashing in to crater the surface. Carbon etc. deposited either way. The only difference with these two is that asteroids and comets are subjected to elevated temperatures prior to impact (and during their formation and exposure in space for billions of years), even in the thin air of Mars, which could cause some chemical reactions to occur, producing a wider variety of compounds than found in dust.

They need to look at variations in chemistry delivered to the surface by the various sources. That is the most significant take home message here, although not noted by the authors. The impactors could be cooking up some unique chemicals not in dust.

Mar 14, 2018
Just read that "the vast majority of interplanetary dust particles in our solar system are released from comets as they approach the sun or from the collision of asteroids in the asteroid belt." So there is even less interest about the difference in what falls on Mars.

Read more at: https://phys.org/...html#jCp

Mar 14, 2018
Hey! It looks like my speculations abut the source of SURFACE debris and water on Mars and Luna, may turn out to be correct.

Well, accidents happen.

Sorry about that...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more