Man-made earthquake risk reduced if fracking is 895m from faults

February 27, 2018, Durham University
Miles Wilson, PhD student, Durham University, UK, who has led research showing that the risk of man-made earthquakes due to fracking is greatly reduced if high-pressure fluid injection used to crack underground rocks is 895m away from faults in the Earth's crust. Credit: Durham University

The risk of man-made earthquakes due to fracking is greatly reduced if high-pressure fluid injection used to crack underground rocks is 895m away from faults in the Earth's crust, according to new research.

The recommendation, from the ReFINE (Researching Fracking) consortium, is based on published microseismic data from 109 operations carried out predominantly in the USA.

Jointly led by Durham and Newcastle Universities, UK, the looked at reducing the risk of reactivating geological faults by injection in boreholes.

Researchers used microseismic data to estimate how far fracking-induced fractures in rock extended horizontally from borehole injection points.

The results indicated there was a one per cent chance that fractures from fracking activity could extend horizontally beyond 895m in shale rocks.

There was also a 32 per cent chance of fractures extending horizontally beyond 433m, which had been previously suggested as a horizontal separation distance between fluid injection points and faults in an earlier study.

The research is published in the journal Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources.

Fracking - or - is a process in which rocks are deliberately fractured to release oil or gas by injecting highly pressurised fluid into a borehole. This fluid is usually a mixture of water, chemicals and sand.

In 2011 tremors in Blackpool, UK, were caused when injected fluid used in the fracking process reached a previously unknown geological fault at the Preese Hall fracking site.

Fracking is now recommencing onshore in the UK after it was halted because of fracking-induced earthquakes.

Research lead author Miles Wilson, a PhD student in Durham University's Department of Earth Sciences, said: "Induced earthquakes can sometimes occur if fracking fluids reach geological faults. Induced earthquakes can be a problem and, if they are large enough, could damage buildings and put the public's safety at risk.

"Furthermore, because some faults allow fluids to flow along them, there are also concerns that if injected fluids reach a geological fault there is an increased risk they could travel upwards and potentially contaminate shallow groundwater resources such as drinking water.

"Our research shows that this risk is greatly reduced if injection points in fracking boreholes are situated at least 895m away from geological faults."

The latest findings go further than a 2017 ReFINE study which recommended a maximum distance of 433m between horizontal boreholes and geological faults. That research was based upon numerical modelling in which a number of factors, including fluid injection volume and rate, and fracture orientation and depth, were kept constant.

Researchers behind the latest study said that changing these parameters might lead to different horizontal extents of fractures from points.

The researchers added that this did not mean the modelling results of the previous study were wrong. Instead they said the previous study was approaching the same problem using a different method and the new study provided further context.

In the latest research the researchers used data from previous fracking operations to measure the distance between the furthest detected microseismic event - a small earthquake caused by hydraulic fracturing of the rock or fault reactivation - and the injection point in the fracking borehole.

From the 109 fracking operations analysed, the researchers found that the horizontal extent reached by hydraulic fractures ranged from 59m to 720m.

There were 12 examples of fracking operations where hydraulic fractures extended beyond the 433m proposed in the 2017 study.

According to the new study, the chance of a hydraulic fracture extending beyond 433m in shale was 32 per cent and beyond 895m was one per cent.

The research also found that fracking operations in shale rock generally had their furthest detected microseismic events at greater distances than those in coal and sandstone rocks.

Microseismic data was used in previous Durham University research from 2012. This suggested a minimum vertical distance of 600m between the depth of fracking and aquifers used for drinking water, which now forms the basis of hydraulic fracturing regulation in the UK's Infrastructure Act 2015.

Professor Richard Davies, Newcastle University, who leads the ReFINE project, said: "We strongly recommend that for the time being, fracking is not carried out where faults are within 895m of the fracked borehole to avoid the risk of fracking causing earthquakes and that this guideline is adopted world-wide."

Explore further: Fracking and earthquakes—weighing up the dangers in South Africa

More information: M. P. Wilson et al, Fracking: How far from faults?, Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s40948-018-0081-y

Related Stories

Recommended for you

In colliding galaxies, a pipsqueak shines bright

February 20, 2019

In the nearby Whirlpool galaxy and its companion galaxy, M51b, two supermassive black holes heat up and devour surrounding material. These two monsters should be the most luminous X-ray sources in sight, but a new study using ...

When does one of the central ideas in economics work?

February 20, 2019

The concept of equilibrium is one of the most central ideas in economics. It is one of the core assumptions in the vast majority of economic models, including models used by policymakers on issues ranging from monetary policy ...

Research reveals why the zebra got its stripes

February 20, 2019

Why do zebras have stripes? A study published in PLOS ONE today takes us another step closer to answering this puzzling question and to understanding how stripes actually work.

Correlated nucleons may solve 35-year-old mystery

February 20, 2019

A careful re-analysis of data taken at the Department of Energy's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has revealed a possible link between correlated protons and neutrons in the nucleus and a 35-year-old mystery. ...

8 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Steve_S2
not rated yet Feb 27, 2018
No mention IF this will affect long dormant faults which may not be known. Texas recently got a rude awakening after a few faults which had been dormant for 10,000 + years became active again and started spreading and interconnecting. In regards to UK in general, the added stresses on the tectonic plates from the mass ice melting in the north, along with the accompanying geological uplift should be a factor in the research and accounted for. These may be wildcard factors but they are changing things exponentially quicker.
Whatmaze
not rated yet Feb 27, 2018
Really? Not 894 m or 896 m but 895 m ?
Thorium Boy
3 / 5 (2) Feb 27, 2018
When will the hypocritical mutts in New York stop using fracked fuel from the Dakotas, since they won't allow fracking in their OWN state? Typical of that group.
chuck_in_st_paul
1 / 5 (1) Feb 28, 2018
uh, fracking is NOT the main cause of all the shakers going on now (in the US). It is an issue of waste water injection into old wells (and other deep holes). In addition, 90% of that water is NOT from fracking.

I agree that more care must be taken as all sorts of faults have been activated recently but the government and industry and academia in the US have published all sorts research papers on this. There are several waste water recovery systems available. Having said that, one of the issues is radioactive waste water. There's a lot of thorium, uranium, etc. when you move water in deep layers for long distances. Again, I've seen a number of papers purporting to be able to handle that in economical volumes. We just need to make it price competitive with downwell pumping. A tax perhaps? (as much as I hate to suggest a tax)
Turgent
1 / 5 (1) Feb 28, 2018
What a superficial piece of work.

Turgent
1 / 5 (1) Feb 28, 2018
When will the hypocritical mutts in New York stop using fracked fuel from the Dakotas, since they won't allow fracking in their OWN state? Typical of that group.


"When"? Never NYC lives in a world removed from reality.
Porgie
1 / 5 (1) Feb 28, 2018
This is a crock! a Liberal crock. New York State could supply the US with years of oil reserves and tens of thousands of jobs. But the democrats hate jobs, growth, and prosperity. They don't do well if America is prospering. So screw you American worker we want you to suffer. So you will want our cheap temporary handouts.
Turgent
1 / 5 (1) Feb 28, 2018
If the downstate NYC public employee unions could get their grubby hands on the oil/gas property taxes NYS would be the nations biggest oil boom. Filthy bastards!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.