Giant handaxes suggest that different groups of early humans coexisted in ancient Europe

Giant handaxes suggest that different groups of early humans coexisted in ancient Europe
Researchers work on the archaeological site in Spain, known as Porto Maior, where the tool deposits were found. Credit: Eduardo Méndez Quintas, Author provided

Even our earliest human ancestors made and used technology—something we can look back on thanks to the lasting nature of stone tools.

An exceptionally high density of giant handaxes dated to 200,000-300,000 years ago has been uncovered at an archaeological site in Galicia, northwest Spain. The findings are documented in a new article published by our international research team of archaeologists and dating specialists.

The discovery of these handaxes suggests that alternative types of tool technologies were simultaneously being used by different populations in this area – supporting the idea that a prehistoric "Game of Thrones" scenario existed as Neanderthals emerged in Europe.

Additional evidence for this idea comes from fossil records showing that multiple human lineages lived in southwest Europe around the same time period.

Stone tool technology

Porto Maior is near the town of As Neves (Pontevedra, Galcia) on a terrace 34m above the current level of the Miño River, which borders northern Portugal and Spain.

The archaeological site at Porto Maior preserves an ancient stone tool culture known as the Acheulean. Characterised by symmetrically knapped stones or large flakes (known as bifaces), the Acheulean is the first sophisticated handaxe technology known in the early human settlement record of Europe.

While Acheulean sites are widespread across the continent, Porto Maior represents Europe's first extensive accumulation of large cutting tools (LCTs) in the Acheulean tradition. Until now, such high densities of LCTs had only been found in Africa. This new finding reinforces an African origin for the Acheulean in Europe, and confirms an overlap in time-frames of distinctly different stone tool cultures on the continent.

Giant handaxes suggest that different groups of early humans coexisted in ancient Europe
The large tools are consistent with a culture known as Acheulean. Credit: Eduardo Mendez Quintas, Author provided

At around the same time that handaxes were being used at Porto Maior, a different stone tool tradition (the Early Middle Palaeolithic) was present in Iberia, for example at Ambrona and Cuesta de la Bajada. In central and eastern Europe – where tools were made exclusively on small flakes – the Acheulean tradition has never been found.

Porto Maior introduces further complexity to this overlapping technological pattern, and suggests that distinct early human populations of different geographical origins coexisted during the Middle Pleistocene (between 773,000 and 125,000 years ago).

Abundant large cutting tools

In total, 3,698 discarded artefacts were recovered from river-lain sediments at the site, with 290 of these making up the studied assemblage reported in our new paper.

The stone tool assemblage is composed of 101 LCTs in original position, and that are on average 18cm long, with a maximum length of 27cm. These handaxe dimensions are exceptionally large by European Acheulean standards (typically only 8-15cm long). The assemblage also contains large cleavers, a type of tool typically found in African sites.

At 9.5 pieces per m² in an excavated area of more than 11.8m², the density of the Acheulean stone tool accumulation is one of the highest recorded globally, surpassing previous European findings of smaller Acheulean tools (usually less than 3 artefacts per m²).

Giant handaxes suggest that different groups of early humans coexisted in ancient Europe
Luminescence dating samples being measured under controlled lighting conditions at the University of Adelaide’s Prescott Environmental Luminescence Laboratory. Credit: Lee Arnold

Laboratory analyses indicate that the tools were used to process hard materials such wood and bone, in activities that could have included the breaking up of carcasses.

The Spanish site of Porto Maior clearly resembles extensive accumulations of very large tools previously only seen in Africa and the Near East. These similarities reinforce the idea of an African origin for the Acheulean tradition of southwest Europe.

They also raise new questions regarding the origin and mobility of prehistoric human populations – the ancestors of Neanderthals – that occupied the European continent during the Middle Pleistocene period before the arrival of our own species, Homo sapiens.

Dating the tools

The age of these unusually large Acheulean tools at Porto Maior was determined using two different dating methods – post-infrared infrared stimulated luminescence (pIR-IRSL) dating of potassium feldspar grains and electron spin resonance (ESR) dating of quartz grains.

These techniques provide an estimate of the last time sand grains within sediments were exposed to sunlight, by looking at their luminescence or paramagnetic properties – that is, they can tell us the timing of sediment burial. This, in turn, can be used to determine when the site was last occupied and when the artefacts discarded by prehistoric populations were subsequently buried by sediment accumulation.

In the study of Porto Maior, pIR-IRSL and ESR dating were applied to grains that had been carefully collected from the sediment layers hosting the , without exposing the sample material to daylight.

Giant handaxes suggest that different groups of early humans coexisted in ancient Europe
Acheulean tools in their primary position at Porto Maior, Spain. Credit: Eduardo Mendez-Quintas, CC BY

The two methods, which were applied independently at two different Australian institutions (University of Adelaide and Griffith University), produced remarkably similar ages.

This confirms the reliability of the dating results, and indicates that the archaeological record spanned the time period from 200,000 to 300,000 years ago.

Migration from Africa

The Acheulean tool-making tradition originated in Africa about 1.7 million years ago, and disappeared on that continent by 500,000 years ago. The specific type of Acheulean tools described at Porto Maior is exclusive to southwest Europe, suggesting that the technology was brought into the region by an "intrusive" population.

The age of Porto Maior is consistent with previous findings from Iberia that suggest that the Acheulean culture experienced an expansion in the region between 400,000 to 200,000 years ago.

This latest discovery supports the increasingly complex narrative developing from ongoing studies of human fossils from Europe; namely that human groups of potentially different origins and evolutionary stages coexisted across the continent during a time when the emergence of Neanderthals was taking place.

While it is clear that more human fossil and stone sites need to be reliably dated across the region, a picture appears to be emerging of a turbulent "Game of Thrones" style scenario of hominin evolution in Eurasia during the Middle Pleistocene period.


Explore further

Stone tools in India suggest earlier human exit from Africa

Provided by The Conversation

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation: Giant handaxes suggest that different groups of early humans coexisted in ancient Europe (2018, February 23) retrieved 16 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-02-giant-handaxes-groups-early-humans.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
213 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 23, 2018
Honestly? I am dubious of the imaginative conclusions offered in this article. "Game of Stones"? Yeah?

Unless they find hominid remains showing damage from mass violence? I'd bet the differing groups/clans/tribes were a lot more cooperative than assumed by the writers. I suspect this site was a factory of onsite stone nodules. Working the rock on site and carry the finished products away, would make more sense.

It would be helpful if a careful search of the surrounding area could find campsites. Remains of butchered animals and the root stumps of hacked trees. Maybe hominid burial sites?

Perhaps a forensic analysis of the topology would show probable long-term migratory paths of large grazers? That could explain finding onsite, large chopping stones, used to butcher large game animals.

Discovering camp-sites with remnants of fires might narrow down dating with more precision? Clarify, if different peoples used the site at the same time? Or avoided contact?

Feb 24, 2018
If you think 'Game of Stones' is bad, consider that 'Game of Thongs' has probably already been done. Better yet, don't.

Feb 25, 2018
Oh TB! You are evil! How will I ever get that vision of hell on earth, out of my pitiful mind?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more