The conflict between males and females could replace the evolution of new species

The conflict between males and females could replace the evolution of new species
Image showing variations between male and female Liolaemus nigriceps. Credit: Dr Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln

New research shows that males and females of the same species can evolve to be so different that they prevent other species from evolving or colonising habitats, challenging long-held theories on the way natural selection drives the evolution of biodiversity.

According to Darwin's theory of natural selection, first introduced in his book On the Origin of Species (1859), new environments such as mountains and islands with abundant food and habitats, offer the 'ecological opportunity' to colonise an area using those resources.

New research from the UK has shown that exactly the same mechanism of evolution that creates new species also operates within the same species when males and females compete for the ecological resources available in different habitats, such as bushy areas or stony patches with abundant food. The conflict between the sexes can lead to one sex becoming bigger, more colourful or adapting to eat different food, just like a traditional process of evolution by natural selection can lead an ancestor to split into two different species.

This process of evolution between the sexes expands the biodiversity of the area - a development that evolutionary biologists previously thought only occurred when the number of different species using different resources or 'niches' increases. This new research challenges that assumption, showing that different species and different sexes of the same species can occupy these niches.

The conflict between males and females could replace the evolution of new species
Image showing variations between male and female Liolaemus tenuis. Credit: Dr Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln

This new research which explored the evolution of lizards in the Chilean Andes Mountains and Argentinean Patagonia, shows that different sexes of the same species can fill niches as well, meaning new species are actively prevented from evolving. This is because there is no new environment for them to occupy - a necessary condition for new species to evolve under Darwin's theory of .

Conducted by academics from the Universities of Lincoln, Exeter and Sheffield, the study demonstrated that biodiversity can now be seen as the formation of new, different species, or, as the formation of different sexes which are distinct enough to be equivalent to different species in the way they 'saturate' .

Dr Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, Senior Lecturer in Evolutionary Biology at the School of Life Sciences at the University of Lincoln and lead researcher on the study, said: "Our research reveals evidence for this intriguing phenomenon that the evolution of sexes within a species could replace the evolution of , which begins to add a new layer to our understanding of the evolution of biodiversity.

"It is important to stress that the diversity of life on our planet applies not only to the evolution of different species, but also to the independent of males and females within the same species, which potentially has very important implications."

The findings have been published in the scientific journal Global Ecology and Biogeography.


Explore further

A survival lesson from bats—eating variety keeps species multiplying

More information: Adrián Castro-Insua et al, A new macroecological pattern: The latitudinal gradient in species range shape, Global Ecology and Biogeography (2018). DOI: 10.1111/geb.12702
Journal information: Global Ecology and Biogeography

Citation: The conflict between males and females could replace the evolution of new species (2018, February 21) retrieved 18 November 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-02-conflict-males-females-evolution-species.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
46 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments