Mandatory state policies work best to curb power plant emissions, study finds

November 6, 2017, Emory University
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

U.S. state policies aimed at mitigating power plant emissions vary widely in effectiveness, finds a new study by researchers at Emory University.

Nature Climate Change published the analysis, which shows that policies with mandatory compliance are associated with the largest reductions in power plant emissions.

"Based on the results of our study, we recommend that adopt a policy of mandatory registry and reporting by power plants," says Eri Saikawa, an assistant professor in Emory's Department of Environmental Sciences. "We also found a significant impact in states that adopt public benefit funds aimed at energy efficiency and renewable energy programs."

Saikawa, an expert in public policy and the science of emissions linked to global warming, co-authored the study with Emory graduate Geoff Martin. Martin received his master's degree in environmental sciences in May and now works as an energy coordinator for the town of Hartford, Vermont.

Their findings were released today as the U.N. Climate Change Conference (COP23) opens in Bonn, Germany. Delegates from around the world are gathering to hammer out details for meeting the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement. The United States was among the 195 countries that committed to this framework to reduce greenhouse gas emissions—although the Trump administration has said it plans to withdraw from this historic accord.

"Due to the current void in national leadership on the issue of , efforts at the state and local level are more important than ever," Saikawa says. "U.S. cities and states need to step up and do what they can."

Global atmospheric CO2 levels increased at record speed last year, to reach a level not seen for more than three million years, the U.N. warned in a report released last week.

About 30 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions come from the electric power sector. For the Nature Climate Change paper, the researchers started out to review the potential impact of President Obama's Clean Power Plan—which established the first national carbon pollution standards for power plants. When President Trump took office, and announced plans to repeal the Clean Power Plan, the researchers shifted focus.

They analyzed 17 policies adopted by various states relating to climate and energy. States that adopted a mandatory policy for power plants to register and report greenhouse gas emissions showed the largest reductions, at an average of 2.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per year.

The second most significant policy involved public benefit funds allotted for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. That policy was associated with a reduction of 1.5 million tons of CO2 emissions from .

It's unclear whether one of these single policies was the actual driver of the reduction in emissions, or an indicator that a state takes climate change mitigation seriously and is attacking the issue on many fronts, Saikawa says.

For instance, three states—New York, Connecticut and Oregon—have each adopted both of the top two most effective policies, along with at least eight others.

Georgia, on the other hand, has adopted only one state policy to curb power plant emissions—calling for voluntary reporting of emissions. Emissions are on the rise in Georgia, along with several other states that had adopted a voluntary reporting , the analysis showed.

In 2007, China surpassed the United States as the largest emitter of greenhouse gases globally. "But the per capita emissions in the United States are more than double that of China," Saikawa notes.

Emory is one of 50 universities from around the country to hold official U.N. observer status for COP23. Saikawa will be on the ground in Bonn to lead a delegation of 12 Emory undergraduates and one graduate student.

"It will be interesting to hear the take of officials from the Trump administration this year," Saikawa says.

The Obama administration played a key role in securing the Paris Agreement, to keep global warming to no more than 2 degrees Celsius since the start of the Industrial Revolution.

"U.S. coalitions from the state and city level are forming and they will likely have a strong presence at side events for COP23," Saikawa says. "Many groups are working at the local level around the world to try to meet the goal of the Paris Agreement."

Emory is co-hosting an event on Thursday, November 16 at COP23, focused on ways to mitigate climate change impacts in the developing world. Saikawa will appear on a panel, along with John Seydel, director of sustainability for the city of Atlanta.

"We'll be discussing how efforts at the city and state level in the United States might be replicated in other parts of the world," Saikawa says.

This marks the third year in a row that Emory has sent a delegation to the U.N. climate talks. The students will report news live from the event on Twitter under the hashtag #EmoryCOP23.

Explore further: US environment chief signs draft rollback on Obama climate plan

More information: Effectiveness of state climate and energy policies in reducing power-sector CO2 emissions, Nature Climate Change (2017). nature.com/articles/doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0001-0

Related Stories

US to join climate talks despite Paris accord exit

August 5, 2017

The United States announced Friday it would still take part in international climate change negotiations in order to protect its interests, despite its planned withdrawal from the Paris accord on global warming.

Recommended for you

Ocean acidification may reduce sea scallop fisheries

September 21, 2018

Each year, fishermen harvest more than $500 million worth of Atlantic sea scallops from the waters off the east coast of the United States. A new model created by scientists at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tblakely1357
1 / 5 (3) Nov 06, 2017
Leftists are authoritarian at their core.
rrwillsj
2.8 / 5 (4) Nov 06, 2017
tb1, then you and your kindred rightist would enjoy marching in lockstep!

To paraphrase the writer Donald Westlake. The difference between leftists and rightist is: A leftist wants to trade in his mimeograph machine for a printing press. While a rightist wants to trade in his mimeograph for a machinegun....
PTTG
5 / 5 (1) Nov 07, 2017
It's simple, it's cheap, and it solves the problem. Plus it doesn't make an artificial market.

rrwillsj: A fine and meaningful quote, but I remind you not to engage trolls. It never helps.
rrwillsj
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 07, 2017
Well P, true it is not helpful to bait the trolls. However, I am a sadist and it amuses to watch them writhe in their masochist frenzy.

As for artificial markets? Consider all the tax subsidies and regulatory protection that make the obsolete weapons industries profitable.

How else can 'manly' men prove their manhood unless they are grasping something stiff and lethal in their tiny hands?
leetennant
4.7 / 5 (3) Nov 07, 2017
Leftists are authoritarian at their core.


I think the same thing every time I realise my drinking water doesn't have arsenic in it.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (2) Nov 07, 2017
@lee, or lead, unless you live in a black city in Michigan where you have a radical right governor.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.