Giant black hole pair photobombs Andromeda galaxy

Giant black hole pair photobombs Andromeda galaxy
Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Univ. of Washington/T.Dorn-Wallenstein et al.; Optical: NASA/ESA/J. Dalcanton, et al. & R. Gendler

It seems like even black holes can't resist the temptation to insert themselves unannounced into photographs. A cosmic photobomb found as a background object in images of the nearby Andromeda galaxy has revealed what could be the most tightly coupled pair of supermassive black holes ever seen.

Astronomers made this remarkable discovery using X-ray data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and optical data from ground-based telescopes, Gemini-North in Hawaii and the Caltech's Palomar Transient Factory in California.

This unusual source, called LGGS J004527.30+413254.3 (J0045+41 for short), was seen in optical and X-ray images of Andromeda, also known as M31. Until recently, scientists thought J0045+41 was an object within M31, a large spiral galaxy located relatively nearby at a distance of about 2.5 million light years from Earth. The new data, however, revealed that J0045+41 was actually at a much greater distance, around 2.6 billion light years from Earth.

"We were looking for a special type of star in M31 and thought we had found one," said Trevor Dorn-Wallenstein of the University of Washington in Seattle, WA, who led the paper describing this discovery. "We were surprised and excited to find something far stranger!"

Even more intriguing than the large distance of J0045+41 is that it likely contains a pair of giant black holes in close orbit around each other. The estimated total mass for these two is about two hundred million times the mass of our Sun.

Previously, a different team of astronomers had seen periodic variations in the optical light from J0045+41, and, believing it to be a member of M31, classified it as a pair of stars that orbited around each other about once every 80 days.

The intensity of the X-ray source observed by Chandra revealed this original classification was incorrect. Rather, J0045+41 had to be either a binary system in M31 containing a neutron star or black hole that is pulling material from a companion—the sort of system Dorn-Wallenstein was originally searching for in M31—or a much more massive and distant system that contains at least one rapidly growing supermassive black hole.

However, a spectrum from the Gemini-North telescope taken by the University of Washington team showed that J0045+41 must host at least one supermassive black hole and allowed the researchers to estimate the distance. The spectrum also provided possible evidence that a second black hole was present in J0045+41 and moving at a different velocity from the first, as expected if the two black holes are orbiting each other.

The team then used optical data from the Palomar Transient Factory to search for periodic variations in the light from J0045+41. They found several periods in J0045+41, including ones at about 80 and 320 days. The ratio between these periods matches that predicted by theoretical work on the dynamics of two giant black holes orbiting each other.

"This is the first time such strong evidence has been found for a pair of orbiting giant black holes," said co-author Emily Levesque of the University of Washington.

The researchers estimate that the two putative black holes orbit each other with a separation of only a few hundred times the distance between the Earth and the Sun. This corresponds to less than one hundredth of a light year. By comparison, the nearest star to our Sun is about four light years away.

Such a system could be formed as a consequence of the merger, billions of years earlier, of two galaxies that each contained a supermassive black hole. At their current close separation, the two black holes are inevitably being drawn closer together as they emit .

"We're unable to pinpoint exactly how much mass each of these black holes contains," said co-author John Ruan, also of the University of Washington. "Depending on that, we think this pair will collide and merge into one black hole in as little as 350 years or as much as 360,000 years."

If J0045+41 indeed contains two closely orbiting black holes it will be emitting gravitational waves, however the signal would not be detectable with LIGO and Virgo. These ground-based facilities have detected the mergers of stellar-mass black holes weighing no more than about 60 Suns and, very recently, one between two neutron stars.

"Supermassive occur in slow motion compared to stellar-mass ", said Dorn-Wallenstein. "The much slower changes in the gravitational waves from a system like J0045+41 can be best detected by a different type of gravitational wave facility called a Pulsar Timing Array."

A paper describing this result was accepted for publication in the November 20th issue of The Astrophysical Journal and is available online.

Explore further

Gravitational waves from merging supermassive black holes will be spotted within 10 years, study predicts

More information: A Mote in Andromeda's Disk: a Misidentified Periodic AGN Behind M31, arXiv:1704.08694 [astro-ph.GA]
Journal information: Astrophysical Journal

Citation: Giant black hole pair photobombs Andromeda galaxy (2017, November 30) retrieved 19 July 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 30, 2017
Science. Make mistakes, find mistakes, admit mistakes, correct mistakes.

Then go on to make new mistakes, repeat cycle... endlessly.

Nov 30, 2017
Hey Jethro, looky there! It's a bright smudge! It must be two black holes orbitin' each another!
Holy cow Xingo Bo, you must be right! 'Sides, we can claim jus'n 'bout anyting we want and no one will question us so long as we claim it to be dark or black.

"We have to learn again that science without contact with experiments is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture." Hannes Alfvén

Here we have the quintessential definition of imaginary conjecture being put forth be the plasma ignoramuses. I

Dec 01, 2017
It was no surprise to see cantderive here spewing the usual EU nonsense.

Dec 02, 2017
m, thank you for the link to the Scientific American article on these subjects. Very informative but the researchers bluntly describe their projects as a work-in-progress. That it is too soon to make definitive conclusions from preliminary data.

Frankly m, your own ideological bias is glaring. Wanting to grab the credit, to be the first to reveal discoveries is just selfish egotism.

There is a whole lot of work, from numerous disciplines, before anyone can offer a final proof for any of these theories.

And, if that final conclusion does not agree with your opinion? Will you have the strength of character to admit you were wrong?

Dec 02, 2017
Frankly m, your own ideological bias is glaring. Wanting to grab the credit, to be the first to reveal discoveries is just selfish egotism
it is worse than you think: mack is actually the latest incarnation of Zephyr

yes, that Zeph - the "aether" pseudoscience acolyte who will routinely attempt to post about water striders, transverse or other waves, water surfaces and his version of how physics and the data should be interpreted

for more on that, see his conversation here:

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more