Women CEOs more likely to be targeted by activist shareholders

October 31, 2017, University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa

Women CEOs are much more likely than their male counterparts to be targeted by activist shareholders, according to research conducted by a team that included two University of Alabama business professors.

The study, published this month in the Journal of Applied Psychology, found male CEOs are much less likely than female CEOs to be the target of activism, and activist investors are more likely to mob female CEOs.

Sometimes also called a "wolf-pack attack," mobbing by investors occurs when multiple activists converge on a firm with or without intentional coordination.

"Many of the media articles we were reading about shareholder activists targeting companies seemed to involve firms with women CEOs," said Dr. Vishal Gupta, associate professor in the UA Culverhouse College of Commerce and author on the paper. "Since there are so few women CEOs at large American firms, we thought it was odd that they were mentioned so often in media coverage about activists. So, we decided to investigate if activists are actually more likely to go after women CEOs."

Dr. Sandra Mortal, also co-author and an associate professor in Culverhouse, said the team sampled large, publicly traded firms for the period from 1996 to 2013.

They relied on filings required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from those wanting to take an active position against a company, commonly called Schedule 13D filings, and merged those with data from the executive research firm ExecuComp.

The business press, such as Forbes or the Wall Street Journal, regularly have articles about some large investors targeting or threatening the management of the companies where they hold stocks, said Mortal, who has previously worked at the SEC as research analyst where she became interested in financial market transparency and fairness.

"Activists usually defend their aggressive stance against management by saying that they want to improve the way the company is being run, in effect, looking out for the common shareholders," Mortal said. "However, our research reveals there are invisible, but serious, biases in their decision to target particular ."

Whether the activist investors are actually aware of their biases was not investigated in this research, Gupta said.

More broadly, the results of this study also reveal the greater scrutiny and monitoring in leadership positions face, which is problematic considering widespread support for gender equality in the workplace, he said.

The paper is titled "Do Women CEOs Face Greater Threat of Shareholder Activism Compared to Male CEOs? A Role Congruity Perspective."

Explore further: New research finds CEOs who appear on CNBC can see their pay rise over $200,000 per year

More information: Do Women CEOs Face Greater Threat of Shareholder Activism Compared to Male CEOs? A Role Congruity Perspective. psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi … 10.1037%2Fapl0000269

Related Stories

Feedback-seeking CEOs boost firm performance

July 20, 2017

For chief executive officers who want to boost their company's bottom line, it pays to be humble. In fact, something as simple as seeking feedback from those who work closely with the CEO has important payoffs.

Study explores why 'family' CEOs think differently

December 10, 2015

Founder-CEOs and CEOs related to the founder see the world differently than CEOs of non-family firms, and they pursue different strategies, according to new research from the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University ...

Recommended for you

Study sheds new light on ancient human-turkey relationship

January 17, 2018

For the first time, research has uncovered the origins of the earliest domestic turkeys in ancient Mexico. The study also suggests turkeys weren't only prized for their meat—with demand for the birds soaring with the Mayans ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rrwillsj
1 / 5 (1) Oct 31, 2017
Why am I not surprised?

Uhhm, cause I've been paying attention. Listening to how groups of males talk about women, when none are around.

Same applies to racists. Very out spoken when surrounded by their pack.

I laugh when people try to explain how much humans have evolved away from the monkeys.

Certainly not far enough in my opinion!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.