Voter behavior influenced by hot weather

Political rebellions and riots have been associated with warmer weather, but until now, there has been little research on its potential influence on peaceful and democratic political behavior. A new study, published in the open-access journal Frontiers in Psychology, has uncovered a connection between changes in temperature and voting behavior in the United States of America.

"We found that increases in state-level temperatures from one election to another are related to increases in state-level turnout, and increases in votes for the incumbent party," says Jasper Van Assche, who completed this research in the Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology at Ghent University, Belgium.

"Voter data from each state was collected for all the U.S. presidential elections from 1960 to 2016 and compared to the difference between maximum temperature on voting day and that of the previous election day," explains Van Assche. "We found that for every 10C increase in temperature, voter turnout increased by 1.4%."

The study also revealed that a rise in temperature motivated some citizens to cast their vote for the smaller political parties (Greens, Libertarians, Independents). Counteracting this, was the finding that warmer weather was a stronger motivator for some citizens to vote for the government currently in power.

"Although these effects are rather small compared to the 'usual suspects' that predict voting, they might play a role in close races," says Van Assche.

The study details one such case; the 2000 presidential election. Applying the findings of the study, Van Assche and his co-authors suggests a mere 10C (1.8oF) increase in temperature may have made Al Gore the 43rd U.S. President instead of George W. Bush, as Gore would have won in Florida.

Van Assche is keen to explain that his results were not affected by other factors that can influence voter behavior.

"Importantly, the relationship between voter behavior and turnout remained true even when we took into account the 'usual suspects' that can have an effect - the president being available for reappointment, the incumbent president being elected or not (Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Gerald Ford were Vice Presidents), presidential approval ratings, whether the president's party had a majority in Congress during the two last years, and change in state gross domestic product (GDP), amongst others."

The study analyzed changes in temperature (an increase or decrease in temperature on voting day, when compared to the previous election day), rather than absolute temperature because of the latter's potential effects on the results. An absolute temperature of 30oC would be a normal temperature for California, but hot in Alaska. Moreover, absolute temperature can be linked to other factors that may affect . For example, poverty is generally higher in countries with hotter climates.

It is hoped that future studies will delve deeper and increase our knowledge of what can influence voter behavior.

"There is a large amount of research on , but little attention has been paid to the seemingly illogical factors that can influence the way people vote. Future studies could expand our understanding by tapping into smaller levels of analyses (e.g., cities or counties) or by including emotions (such as anger) which might explain some of the effects," concludes Van Assche.


Explore further

States with expanded Medicaid program saw higher voter turnout

More information: Jasper Van Assche et al, When the Heat Is On: The Effect of Temperature on Voter Behavior in Presidential Elections, Frontiers in Psychology (2017). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00929
Journal information: Frontiers in Psychology

Provided by Frontiers
Citation: Voter behavior influenced by hot weather (2017, August 16) retrieved 19 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2017-08-voter-behavior-hot-weather.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 16, 2017
This certainly does make the American voter appear lazy and disengaged from the electoral process. A sizeable number wait until after the election to make their voice heard...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more