ATLAS experiment takes its first glimpse of the Higgs boson in its favourite decay

July 11, 2017, ATLAS Experiment
ATLAS event display of a Higgs boson decaying to two b-quarks. Credit: ATLAS Collaboration/CERN

Previously, the Higgs boson has been observed decaying to photons, tau-leptons, and W and Z bosons. However, these impressive achievements represent only 30 percent of Higgs boson decays. The Higgs boson's favoured decay to a pair of b-quarks (H→bb) was predicted to happen around 58 percent of the time, thus driving the short lifetime of the Higgs boson, and thus remained elusive. Observing this decay would fill in one of the big missing pieces of our knowledge of the Higgs sector and confirm that the Higgs mechanism is responsible for the masses of quarks; additionally, it might also provide hints of new physics beyond our current theories. All in all, it is a vital missing piece of the Higgs boson puzzle.

But after over 1 million H→bb decays in the ATLAS Experiment alone, why haven't researchers seen it yet? This seems especially strange considering that less frequent Higgs boson decays have been observed.

The answer lies in the abundance of b-quarks created in the ATLAS detector due to strong interactions. We create pairs of b-quarks 10 million times more frequently than we create a H→bb decay, which makes picking them out against that large background an extremely challenging task. We therefore look for H→bb decays when they are produced in association with another particle—in this case, a vector boson (W or Z). The more distinctive decays of vector bosons provide a way to reduce the large background. This leads to a much lower production rate – we expect to have created only 30,000 H→bb decays this way, but it provides an opportunity to spot this elusive decay.

Nevertheless, even in this condition, the background processes that mimic the H→bb signal are still large, complex and difficult to model. The ATLAS collaborators made a major effort to isolate the small H→bb signal from the large background. After selecting the collisions of interest, they were left with the expected number of around 300 H→bb events compared to 70,000 background events. Ultimately, they were hoping to see an excess of collision events over our background prediction (a bump) that appears at the mass of the Higgs boson.

A comparison of the excess of collision data (black points) over the background processes (which have been subtracted from the data), which clearly shows the H→bb decays (filled red area) and the well understood diboson Z→bb decay (grey area) used to validate the result. (Image:) Credit: ATLAS Collaboration/CERN

After analysing all the data ATLAS collected in 2015 and 2016, the researchers have finally achieved the level of precision to confirm evidence for H→bb with an observed significance of 3.6 σ when combining the Run 1 and Run 2 datasets. As shown in the figure, a bump is observed that is highly consistent with expectations, confirming many key aspects of the Higgs bosons behaviour. Next to the bump, there is a decay of a Z boson (mass of 91 GeV) to a b-quark pair, produced in a similar way as the Higgs , but more abundantly. It serves as a powerful validation of the analysis.

Spotting H→bb is just the beginning. Studies of this new decay will open a whole new window onto the Higgs, and may also provide hints of beyond our current theories. Stay tuned to this channel.

Explore further: New ATLAS precision measurements of the Higgs Boson in the 'golden channel'

More information: Evidence for the H→bb decay with the ATLAS detector: atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS … ATLAS-CONF-2017-041/

Related Stories

Evidence found for the Higgs boson direct decay into fermions

June 22, 2014

For the first time, researchers at CERN have found evidence for the direct decay of the Higgs boson into fermions—another strong indication that the particle discovered in 2012 behaves in the way the standard model of particle ...

ATLAS sees Higgs boson decay to fermions

November 28, 2013

The ATLAS experiment at CERN has released preliminary results that show evidence that the Higgs boson decays to two tau particles. Taus belong to a group of subatomic particles called the fermions, which make up matter. ...

ATLAS and CMS experiments shed light on Higgs properties

September 1, 2015

Three years after the announcement of the discovery of a new particle, the so-called Higgs boson, the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations present for the first time combined measurements of many of its properties, at the third annual ...

Recommended for you

Structure of fossil-fuel source rocks is finally decoded

November 13, 2018

The fossil fuels that provide much of the world's energy orginate in a type of rock known as kerogen, and the potential for recovering these fuels depends crucially on the size and connectedness of the rocks' internal pore ...

Atomic parity violation research reaches new milestone

November 12, 2018

A reflection always reproduces objects as a complete mirror image, rather than just its individual parts or individual parts in a completely different orientation. It's all or nothing, the mirror can't reflect just a little. ...

10 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (4) Jul 11, 2017
Wow! You guys are really smart! What's a particle? What is your basis function? Have you identified anything that is axiomatic? Maybe you are wrong, I think you are only measuring field events. Everything else is nonsense. I think we know the source of the field. No? Ask the guy who built your instrumentation. You do acknowledge your instrumentation. You are not that guy that identified a 2ns delay in an optical coupler are you? Juz say'n clear signal an all, delay? I think either you no idea of calibration, or ... Dr.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (4) Jul 11, 2017
Not even a coupler, a connector! Guys? There's a hole in your theory.

Basis: What holds the nucleus together? Not a theory, a question!

Not gluons, neutrons!
georgesardin
not rated yet Jul 12, 2017
May be it would be useful having a look at the graph:

"On the progression of the mass of elementary particles" at:

https://www.resea...articles
georgesardin
not rated yet Jul 12, 2017
Why don't you try to analyse your experimental results in the framework of the QOD (Quantum Orbital Dynamics) in addition to that of QCD. QOD is conceptually much handier: neutral particles are considered to be composed of two electric charges of opposite sign in the quantum state . In their dissociation the two electric charges get apart and then acquire the charged quantum states , which can be a pair e-, e+, or µ-, µ+, or π-, π+, or K-, K+, etc.

The electric charge q- must not be assimilated to an electron, as it is commonly done, since it can acquire diverse quantum states such as that of the electron, the muon, the negative pion, the negative kaon, and so on. What defines the particle is just the quantum state of the electric charge q.
georgesardin
not rated yet Jul 12, 2017
If interested in this viewpoint, for further information you may read the following articles:

Space, this great unknown

and:

Fundamentals of the Orbital Conception of Elementary Particles and of Their Application to the Neutron and Nuclear Structure

and still more at:

https://www.resea...ibutions
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Jul 12, 2017
If interested in this viewpoint, for further information you may read the following articles:

Space, this great unknown

and:

Fundamentals of the Orbital Conception of Elementary Particles and of Their Application to the Neutron and Nuclear Structure

and still more at:

https://www.resea...ibutions

I prefer Maxwell!
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Jul 14, 2017
if charge exist then we may exist. First master this domain!
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Jul 14, 2017
We only see the superposition and position of a field center in time and space. This could be a delusion! Think there only exist the field, we see as spherical and diametrical, i.e. the existence of it's center. So if we want to understand that, don't look for a beginning or an end. We created that. Just stack the centers at a point in time and call that the beginning. It's still part of a continuum! Space and time, those are our ideas.

You are looking at it all wrong!

You may simulate any with random numbers, Monte Carlo, self assimilation by using a space defined by think lamda in space and time, however you visualize it, C = 1. Dimensionally we see at any chosen point, the update of all fields, as per initial conditions,

If you want to assume at first there is nothing and now there is us then you start with an infinite stack of pairs, within an infinite space, and an infinite time, probability of instability? The field from each point and timing and harmonics,
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Jul 14, 2017
...
If you want to assume at first there is nothing and now there is us then you start with an infinite stack of pairs, within an infinite space, and an infinite time, probability of instability? The field from each point and timing and harmonics,

or see things based upon any time scale or spatial scale, without blowing up the world.
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Jul 14, 2017
...
If you want to assume at first there is nothing and now there is us then you start with an infinite stack of pairs, within an infinite space, and an infinite time, probability of instability? The field from each point and timing and harmonics,

or see things based upon any time scale or spatial scale, without blowing up the world.

Make this tool available available to kids. That's how we discover our world. Now what mathematical models can we build for control?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.