Like people, great apes may distinguish between true and false beliefs in others

April 5, 2017, Public Library of Science
Right before the response phase, the experimenter tries to open the box which he believes contains his object (false-belief condition) or which he knows is empty (true-belief condition). In both conditions this is the same empty box; all that differs is the experimenter's belief about what is in it. Credit: Buttelmann et al (2017)

Great apes help a person access an object when that person thinks they knows where it is but is mistaken, according to a study published April 5, 2017 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by David Buttelmann from Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany, and colleagues.

Understanding when someone else has a false belief is a mark of advanced social cognition in people, and researchers had believed that great apes lacked this capacity. Using a test that was developed for 1.5-year-old human infants, Buttelmann and colleagues evaluated understanding of others' beliefs in 34 great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans) at the Leipzig Zoo in Germany.

The test involved a person placing an object in one of two boxes. Another person then took this object out of this box, put it into another box, and locked both boxes. For the true belief condition, the first person stayed in the room—so this person knew where the object was and thus had a true belief. For the false belief condition, however, the first person was out of the room during the switch —so while he thought he knew where the object was, he was mistaken and thus had a false . In both conditions, the first person tried to open the box he originally had put his object in. The apes knew how to unlock the boxes, and could decide which box to open for the first person during the test.

The researchers found that, like human infants, great apes were more likely to help the person find the when he had a about which box the object was in. This suggests that great apes used their understanding of the person's beliefs about reality to decide how to help him. If true, say the researchers, great apes, like people, may have the capacity to "read" the minds of others in social interactions.

"This study shows for the first time that great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans) can use an understanding of false beliefs to help others appropriately," says David Buttelmann.

Explore further: Apes understand that some things are all in your head

More information: Buttelmann D, Buttelmann F, Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M (2017) Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0173793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173793

Related Stories

Apes understand that some things are all in your head

October 6, 2016

We all know that the way someone sees the world, and the way it really is, aren't always the same. This ability to recognize that someone's beliefs may differ from reality has long been seen as unique to humans.

Apes know a good thriller when they see one

September 17, 2015

Remember the scene in the classic movie Alien, when that creepiest of creatures bursts out of John Hurt's belly as he writhes in pain? Well, according to a study reported in the Cell Press journal Current Biology on September ...

Great apes make sophisticated decisions

December 29, 2011

Chimpanzees, orangutans, gorillas and bonobos make more sophisticated decisions than was previously thought. Great apes weigh their chances of success, based on what they know and the likelihood to succeed when guessing, ...

Recommended for you

Understanding how to control 'jumping' genes

June 22, 2018

A team of Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife Research scientists have made a new discovery of how a single protein, Serrate, plays dual roles in controlling jumping genes.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Apr 05, 2017
The words used bad spelling:
knowswhere, theopen-access, forEvolutionary, socialcognition, thiscapacity, personthen, bothboxes, thisperson, falsebelief, afalse, heoriginally, andcould, tohelp, theobject, theperson's, theresearchers, mindsof

5 / 5 (1) Apr 06, 2017
I thought we really sucked at determining false beliefs both in others and in ourselves. Think about any nonsense religion, convention, custom, belief, etc.

Maybe big monkeys are more rational than we are, or maybe they are just not not smart enough?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.