Project brings Milky Way's ionized hydrogen into focus

April 12, 2017 by Terry Devitt
A survey image of ionized hydrogen gas in the Milky Way. The gas, shown in red, is recognized as a distinct feature of the galaxy — the Reynolds Layer — named after former UW–Madison astrophysicist Ron Reynolds, who discovered it. Credit: WHAM COLLABORATION, UW–MADISON, SPACE SCIENCE INSTITUTE & NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Like a lot of pioneering science, the Wisconsin H-Alpha Mapper (WHAM) got its start as the shoestring project of a curious young researcher.

Sawing a hole in the ceiling of an office at the University of Wisconsin–Madison's Physical Sciences Laboratory in the late 1970s, astrophysicist Ron Reynolds pointed a specially built spectrometer skyward for the first time and discovered a previously unknown feature of the Milky Way.

Everywhere he looked with his novel telescope, Reynolds observed the faint red glow of ionized gas. It was the first hard evidence that vast clouds of ionized hydrogen—hydrogen gas atoms stripped of electrons—permeate the space between the stars. "No one expected to see ionized hydrogen out in the middle of nowhere," he said in a 2004 interview. "It's all over the sky, but it is brightest in the plane of the galaxy."

Building on those first efforts to tease out a new and mostly hidden feature of our galaxy, Reynolds and his colleagues, including Matt Haffner, a senior scientist in UW–Madison's astronomy department, developed WHAM, a spectrometer capable of detecting the faint, diffuse light emanating from the space between the stars. The instrument, supported by the National Science Foundation and operated by the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, has been in almost continuous operation for the past 20 years. It was first atop Kitt Peak in Arizona and then relocated to Cerro Tololo in Chile, where it has been observing the Southern Hemisphere sky for about the past decade.

This past month, Haffner, who assumed direction of WHAM upon Reynolds' retirement in 2005, and his colleagues released the deepest, most comprehensive survey to date of the ionized hydrogen that permeates the Milky Way. Now known to astrophysicists as the "Reynolds Layer" after the UW–Madison scientist who discovered it, the feature mapped by WHAM shows a massive amount of ionized hydrogen—a structure 75,000 light years in diameter and 6,000 light years thick—that both envelops the plane of the galaxy and rotates in step with it.

Wisconsin H-Alpha Mapper (WHAM) at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. WHAM has been an astronomical workhorse, mapping a key ingredient of the Milky Way’s interstellar soup of dust and gas for two decades — first atop Kitt Peak, Arizona, and for about the last decade in the Andes mountains. Credit: L.M. HAFFNER

"It's kind of like a galactic atmosphere," says Haffner. "We're tracing the same kind of emission in the visible part of the spectrum that gives rise to bright nebulae. But over much of the galaxy, it's just very, very faint."

Ionized hydrogen is one ingredient in the soup of elements that make up what astronomers call the , the patchy mix of dust and gas that exists between the stars. The materials found there are part of the big story of galactic life and death, says Haffner, explaining that the clouds of materials found in interstellar space come from dead and dying stars and ultimately will be recycled into new stars and planets.

The composition and dynamics of the interstellar medium, he says, can reveal how a galaxy evolves over time.

"Our galaxy is middle-aged," Haffner says. Middle age for a galaxy means it is not going through the dramatic changes typically experienced by older or younger . "In that kind of steady state, how does everything work?"

A critical insight derived from WHAM is that some stars may be bigger actors than previously believed, exerting their influence at greater distances. Ionizing hydrogen or any other element requires energy, and stars are known to ionize atoms in their immediate neighborhoods.

Infrared image from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope shows hundreds of thousands of stars crowded into the swirling core of the Milky Way. Credit: NASA PHOTO

One reason WHAM observes so much ionized hydrogen in the plane of the galaxy is that lots of hot stars reside there. What puzzled astrophysicists, Haffner says, is how clouds of ionized hydrogen can occur light years above the plane.

"For us to see this emission everywhere, the gas has to be actively ionized," he says. "What are the sources of energy that keep it going?"

What Haffner and other scientists think is happening is that what are known as O-type stars—very large, bright and relatively short-lived stars ranging in size from 15 to 90 times the mass of the sun and born deep in the plane of the galaxy—are somehow able to ionize gas across the galaxy, far from the stellar nurseries in its plane. Evidence for this idea was supplied by WHAM data, which in 2003 toppled the notion that ionized hydrogen in the galaxy occurred only in what are known as Strömgren Spheres, nebulae in the immediate vicinity of O-type stars.

WHAM may one day provide enough data to unravel the mystery of how hydrogen in interstellar deserts can be ionized, far from the astronomers think are responsible. It continues its survey of the galaxy on every clear, moonless night, stepping and gathering data in 30-second exposures across wide quadrants of sky.

More recently, Haffner and his colleagues have been gathering data from the Magellanic Clouds, two smaller neighboring galaxies visible from the Southern Hemisphere. Having data from galaxies beyond the Milky Way, he says, may well provide insight into the puzzles of our own galaxy.

Explore further: Probe opens a new window to interstellar space

Related Stories

Probe opens a new window to interstellar space

January 16, 2005

Taking stock of the stuff between the stars - the all-important dust and gases that are the building blocks of new stars - has never been easy. The interstellar medium, as scientists know it, is a murky, nebulous place that ...

Festive nebulae light up Milky Way Galaxy satellite

December 20, 2016

The sheer observing power of the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope is rarely better illustrated than in an image such as this. This glowing pink nebula, named NGC 248, is located in the Small Magellanic Cloud, just under 200 ...

Dwarf galaxy that reveals the history of the universe

March 24, 2015

The first galaxies were formed some 13.3 billion years ago, mainly composed of hydrogen and helium, the primary elements that emerged from the Big Bang. Their study to date has been technically very challenging due to their ...

Hubble looks in on a galactic nursery

July 27, 2015

This dramatic image shows the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope's view of dwarf galaxy known as NGC 1140, which lies 60 million light-years away in the constellation of Eridanus. As can be seen in this image NGC 1140 has an ...

Recommended for you

Solar minimum surprisingly constant

November 17, 2017

Using more than a half-century of observations, Japanese astronomers have discovered that the microwaves coming from the sun at the minimums of the past five solar cycles have been the same each time, despite large differences ...

10 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

HannesAlfven
2 / 5 (8) Apr 12, 2017
Re: "WHAM may one day provide enough data to unravel the mystery of how hydrogen in interstellar deserts can be ionized, far from the stars astronomers think are responsible."

Yes, indeed, such a deep mystery. Perhaps one day we may find out ...
HannesAlfven
1.5 / 5 (8) Apr 12, 2017
What we can be sure of is that when the next big revolution in physics occurs -- whatever it is -- it will be downvoted in the comments at phys.org.
Captain Stumpy
4.1 / 5 (9) Apr 12, 2017
What we can be sure of is that when the next big revolution in physics occurs -- whatever it is -- it will be downvoted in the comments at phys.org.
@hannes/reeve the pseudoscience eu cultist
logical fallacy - just because your particular brand of pseudoscience is downrated doesn't mean actual science will be downrated

also note, this has not historically been true, either

the problem isn't the science, it's your lack of actual evidence or your insistence of Gish-Gallop as argument

and also your tendency to ignore all empirical evidence that directly refutes your claims - even and especially when said evidence is well established and validated

Chris_Reeve
2.1 / 5 (7) Apr 12, 2017
Well, "Captain", what do YOU offer as the solution to their riddle for how ionized hydrogen exists in deep space?
Captain Stumpy
4.3 / 5 (6) Apr 12, 2017
@hannes/reeve the pseudoscience eu cultist
Well, "Captain", what do YOU offer as the solution to their riddle for how ionized hydrogen exists in deep space?
1- i answered your post as written

2- i don't offer speculation based upon delusional beliefs like the electric unicorns cult

3- if you follow the evidence ...

in other words: i am not offering speculation on anything

also note:
my specialty isn't astrophysics just like your specialty has nothing to do with science or facts

HannesAlfven
2.7 / 5 (7) Apr 13, 2017
You seem very anti-idea to me.
Captain Stumpy
4.3 / 5 (6) Apr 13, 2017
@hannes/reeve the socks of the eu pseudoscience cultist
You seem very anti-idea to me.
nope
i am actually very open to new ideas

especially ideas with evidence or that can be plausible because evidence [x] supports claim [y]

however, when you make a statement that [x] is science and it doesn't even conform to the scientific method (like your eu claims)... then i am anti-you because i am definitely against pseudoscience and religion
bschott
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 13, 2017
then i am anti-you

5 words perfectly describing Stumps motivation for posting. If it was any of the more "noble" reasons he constantly claims he would be able to differentiate between valid scientific remarks and "pseudoscience". But as we have all witnessed many times, he responds to the poster and not the post which causes him to appear foolish to all but his devout simpleton army.
Evidence: In the first article below he supports the science, the article and it's conclusions
https://phys.org/...ace.html
Then in this one, calls the same conclusions he supported in the first article "lies" when they are made a poster he does not like...
https://phys.org/...rth.html
In short, he is a twisted delusional stalker with too much time on his hands, a computer...and a lot of misconceptions about the world around him...poor bastard.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (3) Apr 13, 2017
@full-of-bs
If it was any of the more "noble" reasons he constantly claims he would be able to differentiate between valid scientific remarks and "pseudoscience"
if there were valid scientific remarks they would be able to substantiate their claims with valid science

you know, from real studies published in peer reviewed journals and not instantly debunked becuase they violate the known laws of physics

it really is that simple

this is why you are considered a pseudoscience troll
it is why hannes/reeve and all his other socks are considered pseudoscience trolls
it is why the eu pseudoscience cult is ignored by mainstream scientists

In short, you're a twisted delusional stalker with too much time on your hands, a computer...and a lot of misconceptions about the world around you...poor bastard

PS - how goes your super-duper magnetic cancer killer that can't get FDA approval?
http://phys.org/n...ant.html
cantdrive85
1 / 5 (1) Apr 13, 2017
n short, he is a twisted delusional stalker with too much time on his hands, a computer...and a lot of misconceptions about the world around him...poor bastard.

Just put the troll on ignore, it makes for a much better site.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.