Vision, not limbs, led fish onto land 385 million years ago

March 7, 2017
A Tiktaalik looks out and spies a millipede snaking along a branch. Credit: Malcolm MacIver, Northwestern University

A provocative new Northwestern University and Claremont McKenna, Scripps and Pitzer colleges study suggests it was the power of the eyes and not the limbs that first led our ancient aquatic ancestors to make the momentous leap from water to land. Crocodile-like animals first saw easy meals on land and then evolved limbs that enabled them to get there, the researchers argue.

Neuroscientist and engineer Malcolm A. MacIver of Northwestern and evolutionary biologist and paleontologist Lars Schmitz of Claremont McKenna, Scripps and Pitzer colleges studied the fossil record and discovered that eyes nearly tripled in size before—not after—the water-to-land transition. The tripling coincided with a shift in location of the eyes from the side of the head to the top. The expanded visual range of seeing through air may have eventually led to larger brains in early and the ability to plan and not merely react, as fish do.

"Why did we come up onto land 385 million years ago? We are the first to think that vision might have something to do with it," said MacIver, professor of biomedical engineering and of mechanical engineering in the McCormick School of Engineering.

"We found a huge increase in visual capability in vertebrates just before the transition from water to land. Our hypothesis is that maybe it was seeing an unexploited cornucopia of food on land—millipedes, centipedes, spiders and more—that drove evolution to come up with limbs from fins," MacIver said. (Invertebrates came onto land 50 million years before our vertebrate ancestors made that transition.)

The enlargement of eyes is significant. By just popping those eyes above the water line, the fish could see 70 times farther in air than in water. With the tripling of eye size, the animal's visually monitored space increased a millionfold. This happened millions of years before fully terrestrial animals existed.

A side view of a 3-D model of Tiktaalik in a murky waterway in the Devonian, 385 million years ago, looking out above the water line through eyes set on top of the skull, and breathing through spiracles located just behind the eyes. Credit: Malcolm MacIver, Northwestern University

"Bigger eyes are almost worthless in water because vision is largely limited to what's directly in front of the animal," said Schmitz, assistant professor of biology at the W.M. Keck Science Department, a joint program of Claremont McKenna, Scripps and Pitzer colleges.

"But larger eye size is very valuable when viewing through air. In evolution, it often comes down to a trade-off. Is it worth the metabolic toll to enlarge your eyes? What's the point? Here we think the point was to be able to search out prey on land," he said.

Larger eyes were consequently selected for, whereas the study shows that in water, larger eyes led to negligible increases in visual range. In fact, one animal group that arose after animals came onto land went back to full-time life underwater, and their eyes went back to the smaller eye size normally seen in fish, MacIver and Schmitz found.

The study, "Massive Increase in Visual Range Preceded the Origin of Terrestrial Vertebrates," was published today (March 7) by the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The massive increase in visual capability enabled by vision in air likely allowed early-limbed animals to evolve more complex cognition. These animals were no longer forced to react with split-second speed as was required by life in the vision-limiting water. Eventually, the researchers said, evolution led to the human capability of prospective cognition: the power to weigh options for the future and to choose strategically.

MacIver and Schmitz studied 59 fossil specimens spanning the time before the water-to-land transition, during the transition and after the transition. Their computer simulations of the animals' visual environments (such as clear or murky water in the daytime or above water in the daytime and the nighttime) show that the benefit of increased eye size would be realized when an animal is seeing through air, not water.

The researchers measured the size of each fossil's orbits, or eye sockets, and head length. From that, they determined the size of the eyes and the size of the animal itself. They found that before the -to-land transition the average orbit size was 13 millimeters and around the time of transition the average size was 36 millimeters.

"The tripling of orbit size took 12 million years," MacIver said. "This is the timescale of evolution, which boggles our mind."

Through an interdisciplinary approach, MacIver and Schmitz have been able to show that our aquatic ancestors followed an informational zipline provided by long-range vision to an abundance of food on land. Rather than limbs, it was eyes that brought our ancestors to land.

Explore further: Eyes came before limbs in the transition to land

More information: Massive increase in visual range preceded the origin of terrestrial vertebrates, PNAS. Published online before print March 7, 2017. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615563114

Related Stories

Eyes came before limbs in the transition to land

October 28, 2016

The transition to land from our fishy ancestors is one of the most iconic, and best documented, transitions in the fossil record. We know that fleshy-limbed fish living in shallows used their limbs to move in the shallows ...

The evolution of fins to limbs in the land invasion race

July 5, 2013

Why did animals with limbs win the race to invade land over those with fins? A new study comparing the forces acting on fins of mudskipper fish and on the forelimbs of tiger salamanders can now be used to analyze early fossils ...

Discovery sheds light on how vertebrates see

August 2, 2016

New research led by the University of Leicester has overturned a long-standing theory on how vertebrates evolved their eyes by identifying remarkable details of the retina in the eyes of 300 million year-old lamprey and hagfish ...

Fish out of water are more common than thought

June 22, 2016

Fish have evolved the ability to live on land many times, challenging the perception that this extreme lifestyle shift was likely to have been a rare occurrence in ancient times, new UNSW Australia research shows.

New look at crocodile eyes

May 5, 2016

Researchers from The University of Western Australia and Macquarie University have discovered that the visual systems in crocodiles are more cleverly designed than previously thought, allowing them to quickly adapt to their ...

Recommended for you

The oldest plesiosaur was a strong swimmer

December 14, 2017

Plesiosaurs were especially effective swimmers. These long extinct "paddle saurians" propelled themselves through the oceans by employing "underwater flight"—similar to sea turtles and penguins. Paleontologist from the ...

Averaging the wisdom of crowds

December 12, 2017

The best decisions are made on the basis of the average of various estimates, as confirmed by the research of Dennie van Dolder and Martijn van den Assem, scientists at VU Amsterdam. Using data from Holland Casino promotional ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jonseer
4 / 5 (2) Mar 08, 2017
It's massively oversimplified stories like this that keep people believing in intelligent design.

The problem is they make no effort to explain that the entire is hypothetical based on a few bits of information.

When certain people realize how little actual proved fact is behind it, they figure they have every right to do the same thing.

Also the gross oversimplifications leave the story open to easy counters like the fact that there are intelligent creatures with great vision in the ocean like various cephalopods or mantis shrimp which never required moving on to land.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2017
Interesting viewpoint. However guessing at the motivation of the author is not the same as commenting on the info (admittedly limited) presented....
nswanberg
not rated yet Mar 13, 2017
"Crocodile-like animals first saw easy meals on land and then evolved limbs that enabled them to get there, the researchers argue."

Soooooo there were already "tasty land dwellers" on the land?
Guy_Underbridge
4 / 5 (1) Mar 13, 2017
Soooooo there were already "tasty land dwellers" on the land?

As the article states (quite obviously), they're talking about vertebrates...
feralblue
not rated yet Mar 18, 2017
This is so interesting and makes so much sense . . . i would love to see the photos of the skulls of these animals. Science is sooo amazing! (Although, some experiments these days are obviously ridiculous - mostly in psychology i hate to say :)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.