Trump budget 'cripples' environment, science, critics say (Update)

March 16, 2017
US President Donald Trump has offered a tough budget blueprint that slashes spending on diplomacy and the environment and boosts defense outlays

US President Donald Trump's proposed 2018 budget would slash funding for science, health and environmental programs at home and abroad, sparking an outcry Thursday among experts who say the cuts would endanger the planet.

The blueprint, which also includes sharp cuts in spending on the arts and foreign aid, has yet to undergo scrutiny in Congress and must be approved by lawmakers before it can take effect.

But environmentalists swiftly lashed out at the plan, calling it "shocking," and "drastic," particularly for the way it trimmed science programs while boosting defense spending by $52 billion.

A key target was the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which would get $5.7 billion, a 31 percent cut compared with 2017 levels. Some 3,200 jobs at the agency would be eliminated, about one-fifth of its workforce.

The proposal called for an end to funding both former president Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan and international climate-change programs in order to save $100 million for American taxpayers.

The United States typically contributes about $4-6 million per year to help fund the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, about 20 percent of its budget.

UNFCCC spokesman Nick Nuttall said "we understand that approval of such a budget can be a long and complex process and we will follow it with interest."

Zeroed out

Under the EPA cuts, major programs to restore the Chesapeake Bay and Great Lakes would end, along with a popular program to certify environmentally friendly appliances with the Energy Star label.

Some $250 million in programs aimed at protecting coastal life would be "zeroed out" for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, including research and education run by a program called Sea Grant.

Overall, NOAA could reportedly face as much as a $990 million cut from its annual budget.

"The message the budget sends is that our ocean—the engine that drives an economy worth $359 billion and supports millions of people—is simply not a priority for the Trump administration," said Addie Haughey, associate director of government relations at Ocean Conservancy.

"It is cutting bone-deep into the lives, livelihoods and safety of hundreds of thousands of coastal communities from Alaska to Hawaii, Oregon to Florida."

Jacqueline Savitz, senior vice president at the advocacy group Oceana, called on Congress to reject the cuts.

"Funding cuts of this magnitude could cripple key agencies like NOAA and the Coast Guard, which would be devastating to decades of ocean conservation," she said.

"These federal agencies, and the budgets that support them, allow our nation's bedrock conservation laws to sustainably manage our fisheries, protect marine mammals and endangered species, preserve marine habitats, clean up oil spills and so much more."

Asteroid study axed

The main engine for US medical health research, the National Institutes of Health, would lose $5.8 billion, or about 18 percent, bringing its 2018 budget to $25.9 billion.

Four NASA Earth science missions would be shuttered.

Three satellite programs aimed at studying climate change and oceans would never launch.

The fourth—a deep-space Earth observing mission known as DSCOVR which was launched in 2015 and was initially the brainchild of former US vice president Al Gore—would have its cameras turned off.

NASA would also be forced to abandon its plan to lasso an asteroid and coax it into a lunar orbit for study by a human crew sometime in the 2020s.

Otherwise, NASA's budget was left largely intact. It was trimmed by less than one percent.

NASA administrator Robert Lightfoot described the plan as "a positive budget overall for NASA."

But Greenpeace spokesman Travis Nichols had harsher words for the broader White House plan.

"The Trump administration clearly sees corporations as its true constituents, not the people of this country," said Nichols.

"This is a budget proposal that fully reveals the Trump administration's corruption, cynicism, and small-mindedness."

Manish Bapna, managing director of the World Resources Institute, agreed.

"The latest budget continues the administration's shocking disregard for priorities that are critical for people's health and the economy," said Bapna.

Prior to these proposed cuts, international, environment, science and energy programs combined accounted for only three percent of federal spending, said Bob Perciasepe, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.

"We urge Congress to avoid drastic cuts," he said.

"We should be enhancing programs that contribute to quality of life and health, US economic leadership, and long-term security. Inaction on climate today will lead to greater costs tomorrow."

Explore further: Trump's budget would cut NASA asteroid mission, earth science

Related Stories

Obama's budget would boost science, health (Update)

April 10, 2013

The budget proposal that US President Barack Obama released Wednesday would boost funds for major science and health programs while making cuts at NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Good and bad news comes with NASA’s 2012 budget

December 1, 2011

On November 14, President Obama signed an Appropriations bill that solidified NASA’s budget for fiscal year 2012. The space agency will get $17.8 billion. That’s $648 million less than last year’s funding and ...

Trump meeting puts NASA funding in question

December 8, 2016

Since the election of Donald Trump, NASA has had its share of concerns about the future. Given the President-elect's position and past statements on climate science, there has been speculation that his presidency will curtail ...

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rderkis
3 / 5 (2) Mar 16, 2017
Presidents Trump's critics are just that critics against EVERYTHING about him. I am 70 years old and a democrat. If he would give me one REAL reason to disapprove of his ACTIONS (not words) that are greater than his accomplishments, I would not be a Trump supporter. But so far his election has made the stock market soar, cut illegal immigration by 40%, made the jobs report look really good, cut the U.S. debt burden by $68 billion dollars, NFIB Small Business Optimism Index is at its highest level since 2004, cut funding for INTERNATIONAL abortions.
And all this after a little over 50 days in office.
Zzzzzzzz
5 / 5 (2) Mar 16, 2017
rderkis, you know absolutely nothing about Trump's critics. You know absolutely nothing and the scientific method. You know absolutely nothing about economics or the stock market. Is there anything you know? Don't bother trying to answer, that was a rhetorical question. So far Trump has proven to be the weakest president the USA has EVER had Putin has a permanent room in our White House, and Trump is lining to be the first sitting president to be executed for treason.He has surrounded himself with criminals, bigots, and traitors.
His drooling acolytes like yourself dream of the day you could crawl right up his ass.
TrollBane
not rated yet Mar 16, 2017
rderkis, you neglect to mention the slump in foreign tourism that is already evident, the erosion of the country's reputation in the world, the impact of instability on foreign investment, etc. Made the jobs report look really good? How, by giving away enough to maybe keep the company's production?
rderkis
1 / 5 (1) Mar 16, 2017
you know absolutely nothing about Trump's critics. You know absolutely nothing and the scientific method. .

That's not true! I know nothing he could do could change your mind. Your mind is set against him and you are completely unobjective.
I have already stated my mind is flexible and NOTHING could change yours!
rderkis
1 / 5 (1) Mar 16, 2017
[q slump in foreign tourism that is already evident, the erosion of the country's reputation in the world, the impact of instability on foreign investment, etc.
Good! You just made my day :-)
What reputation? We are the country that gives away everything we have, to the point it hurts our children.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.