California lawmakers don't think this fight is emission impossible

March 10, 2017 by Sean Cockerham, Mcclatchy Washington Bureau

The Trump administration could move at any time to revoke California's right to impose stricter auto emissions standards than the federal government does, and the state's senators are already mounting a fight.

Congressional sources are hearing conflicting information on whether and when the Environmental Protection Agency will revoke California's waiver.

Initially the EPA action appeared imminent, but now there is some uncertainty, in part because the action would set up a legal showdown with California that President Donald Trump could lose.

The EPA is refusing to comment, with a spokeswoman saying, "We don't have any information to offer at this time."

California has signaled its willingness to fight Trump in court and has hired former Attorney General Eric Holder to assist with challenges to the president's policies.

No administration has tried to revoke an existing waiver issued under a Clean Air Act for California to set its own auto emissions standards. So there is no legal precedent for how a judge could rule, said Richard Frank, an environmental law processor at the University of California, Davis.

"It would be somewhat difficult and legally suspect for the Trump administration to try and withdraw a waiver that has been previously granted," Frank said.

Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., said she'd been fearing EPA action since agency chief Scott Pruitt told her at his January confirmation hearing that he planned to review the waiver.

Harris noted in a Thursday interview that Pruitt was a champion of state sovereignty as Oklahoma's attorney general before Trump picked him to lead the EPA.

Now, Harris said, he is looking at telling California that it cannot enforce its own vehicle pollution standards.

"You can't talk out of both sides of your mouth," said Harris, a former attorney general of California.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California joined nine other Senate Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, in a letter calling on Pruitt to keep auto pollution standards in place. Trump is expected to roll back the national fuel economy standards that were imposed during the Obama administration in line with California's rules.

The standards "enhance our national security by reducing our consumption of foreign oil. They will benefit consumers, saving them billions of dollars at the pump, and reduce our carbon pollution. It is critical that they remain in place," Feinstein and the other senators wrote.

The automotive industry has been lobbying against the rules, calling them too expensive. Automakers have written letters to the Trump administration saying the standards will be difficult to hit and will force them to produce more cars with higher gas mileage when less-fuel-efficient sport utility vehicles, trucks or larger cars are more popular.

California's ability to set its own auto pollution rules has been a centerpiece of its efforts to combat global warming. California has used the waiver to pressure auto manufacturers to build more efficient vehicles. Harris said the rules had been effective in creating a cleaner environment in the state.

"I'm very concerned. And remember that issues affecting California's consumers affect people around the country, especially when you are talking about auto emissions standards. Because we have almost 39 million people," Harris said. "The industry, in needing to conform to the California standards, has to then adapt, usually, their standards for everyone else."

Trump has made the auto industry a major focus since taking office, saying environmental rules are "out of control."

California started regulating air pollution in the 1960s before the federal Clean Air Act of 1970 was passed. The state has since received federal waivers to enact its own pollution rules, including tailpipe standards, which are stronger than the national rules.

The EPA has consistently granted California the waiver over the years. An exception was 2008, when the George W. Bush administration denied the waiver only to have the Obama administration approve it a year later.

A dozen states, including Massachusetts, have been allowed to adopt the stricter California standards.

"Attacking the California waiver is a recipe for chaos," said Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass.

Explore further: Trump set to roll back federal fuel-economy requirements

9 shares

Related Stories

Trump set to roll back federal fuel-economy requirements

March 7, 2017

The Trump administration is moving to roll back federal fuel-economy requirements that would have forced automakers to increase significantly the efficiency of new cars and trucks, a key part of former President Barack Obama's ...

California officials challenge fracking off coastline

December 20, 2016

California's chief prosecutor and an environmental commission on Monday filed a lawsuit challenging an assessment by federal authorities that clears the way for hydraulic fracturing off the state's coast.

Recommended for you

Heavy oils and petroleum coke raising vanadium emissions

December 15, 2017

Human emissions of the potentially harmful trace metal vanadium into Earth's atmosphere have spiked sharply since the start of the 21st century due in large part to industry's growing use of heavy oils, tar sands, bitumen ...

Climate change made Harvey rainfall 15 percent more intense

December 14, 2017

A team of scientists from World Weather Attribution, including researchers from Rice University and other institutions in the United States and Europe, have found that human-caused climate change made the record rainfall ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
1.7 / 5 (6) Mar 11, 2017
Conservatives want to dominate our lives and make us be polluters like them.

No, thanks, we are building a cleaner world than theirs. They can stay there and choke on coal dust and fume.
gkam
1.7 / 5 (6) Mar 11, 2017
Here is one reason we will pay for cleaner living, unlike the conservative states:

"Earth's oceans are warming 13% faster than thought, and accelerating"

https://www.thegu...lerating

I think the Blue States should stop sending money that goes to the Red States as subsidies for their poor economic performance. We should at least make them use it to clean up their filthy power systems.
PTTG
May 09, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.