Researcher reports strategies to help policymakers break through partisan gridlock

February 17, 2017, University of Virginia
Credit: University of Virginia

Shakespeare's Juliet famously asked, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet." She argued that Romeo's surname, Montague – that of her family's rival house – was a mere title with no real bearing on his "dear perfection" to her.

New research shows that public may benefit from the same untethering. A recent study by the University of Virginia's Craig Volden suggests that lawmakers are more receptive to new policy proposals when they've been scrubbed of references to the rival "house," or .

Volden, a professor of and politics and associate dean for academic affairs at UVA's Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, says that ideologically similar states and localities often adopt similar policies, but he and his colleagues began to question whether that was due solely to like-minded preferences.

"I wanted to know, 'Is this really taking place because policymakers are ideologically predisposed to some policies? Or is it because they actually refuse to learn from other policymakers who are ideologically diverse?'" he said.

Volden and his fellow researchers devised a way to study if local officials, even before reading about the structure and effectiveness of a policy, were inclined to dismiss it, if that policy was associated with members of the opposite party.

Together with colleagues from Washington University in St. Louis, Brigham Young University and Georgetown University, he created survey questions to gauge policy bias in municipal governments. They recently published an article on their findings, "Ideology, Learning and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence," in the American Journal of Political Science.

"The way we were describing it was, 'This is a policy that was adopted in another city. Would you like to learn about it?'" Volden said.

Craig Volden is a professor of public policy and politics and associate dean for academic affairs at the Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy. Credit: Dan Addison, University Communications

To some respondents, the policy was described primarily as a success or a failure. But to others, it was described as a proposal from a specific party. Researchers plugged these scenarios into the American Municipal Officials Survey and found that while ideological differences negatively impact willingness to learn about outside policies, the biases that might turn officials away from new policy ideas can be overcome.

The survey results suggested that placing the emphasis on the success of a policy, or on the fact that it was a co-partisan policy experiment, and de-emphasizing any link to the opposing political party significantly increases policymakers' willingness to learn about it. In other words, officials are more likely to try a new idea if they know it only as a proven success, or if they know other members of their party have tried it.

For this particular study, Volden and his colleagues focused only on the local level and tested policies that had to do with zoning and home foreclosures.

"This time the policies we discussed were government interventions, so they did have something of a liberal bend to them, but we would expect the same results for policies that traditionally align with conservative views," Volden said. "There's no evidence to suggest that bias affects conservatives more than liberals or vice versa."

He explained that the ultimate goal of the study was not to expose bias in one side or the other, but to show strategies to overcome it so that policymakers might be more willing to experiment and learn from their peers about practices that have worked. This new data is especially important for "policy entrepreneurs" pushing for experimentation and improvements in government.

"Policy entrepreneurs can be any number of people or groups. One example is the National Association of County and City Health Officials," Volden said. "They are trying to come up with a campaign to limit children's use of sugar-sweetened beverages. They're talking to a variety of cities and counties and saying, 'Here are some policies you could try out.' They don't know what will work exactly, but they would like there to be broader experimentation and learning."

To Volden, the essential result of using strategies to overcome bias is to spur more conversation. A greater willingness to discuss policy on its merits is good for both sides of the aisle, especially among local government officials who can have more leeway for trial and error.

"Since there's so much partisanship, polarization and gridlock at the national level, a lot of policymaking and implementation falls to the local and state levels," Volden said. "We did find that they were polarized somewhat also, but that those biases could be overcome through this learning process."

Explore further: Competing attitudes about the homeless complicate public policy

More information: "Ideology, Learning and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence," … olden_csdi_paper.pdf

Related Stories

Physiological responses reveal our political affiliations

June 16, 2015

New research from Aarhus University in Denmark shows that political partisanship is rooted in affective, physiological processes that cause partisans to toe the party line on policies and issues, regardless of policy content.

Examining the effects of regulating tobacco sales

October 28, 2016

State actions to regulate retail sales of tobacco nearly doubled between 2012 and 2014, according to new research from the Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, but much of that activity involved e-cigarettes, ...

New study to investigate impact of lobbying

March 30, 2016

Academics at the University of Exeter will investigate how policy is influenced by lobbying in the UK, the USA, the Netherlands and Germany to see which kinds of groups may have unfair access because of their funding, status ...

Americans support local control of schools

July 17, 2012

Despite criticism that local school boards are "dinosaurs" that need to be replaced, Americans support local control of their schools, Michigan State University education scholars argue in a new paper.

Recommended for you

T. Rex couldn't stick out its tongue, new research shows

June 20, 2018

Dinosaurs are often depicted as fierce creatures, baring their teeth, with tongues wildly stretching from their mouths like giant, deranged lizards. But new research reveals a major problem with this classic image: Dinosaurs ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Feb 25, 2017
If policies are accepted or rejected based on the partisan origin of the proposal, that means that politicians are not interested in the welfare of the people! They do not choose proposals based on if they will help the people, but only on the political gain their party can make! Articles about Democratic response to Trump becoming president fixate on tactics to win in future elections involving things like increasing voter turnout. They don't consider things like tailoring the platform to address decency and the well being of the "rank and file". If they could arrange for people as young as six to vote to increase their base, they would. Note, also, politicians pretend like their choices are in response to problems the world provides, as if, without the solution, things will get worse. If it's only based on partisan source for the legislation, that means they know things are not the way they describe, that things will not go bad the way thy claim.
1 / 5 (3) Feb 25, 2017
I did not intend the one rating above, but a three.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.