First experimental proof of a 70 year old physics theory

January 3, 2017
Simplified representation of the 2D magnetic phase transition. Credit: Institute for Basic Science

PARK Je-Geun, Associate Director at the Center for Correlated Electron Systems and collaborators have demonstrated the magnetic behavior of a special class of 2-D materials. This is the first experimental proof to a theory proposed more than 70 years ago. The paper, describing the experiment, is published in the journal Nano Letters.

Recently, scientists all over the world are investigating the properties and applications of extremely thin 2-D materials, just one-atom-thick, like graphene. Studying the properties of 2-D materials in comparison with their 3-D counterparts raises many thought-provoking questions; one of them concerns magnetic phase transitions.

Some materials are magnetic because of the behavior of the spins of their electrons. In simple terms, spins (spin quantum numbers, or more precisely their associated magnetic moments), are just like tiny magnets, conventionally shown as arrows. At , these spins tend to align, lowering the electrons' total energy. However, above a specific temperature that varies from material to material, spins lose their alignment and become randomly oriented. Similar to how ice loses its internal order and becomes liquid above a certain temperature; 3-D magnets also lose their magnetization above a critical temperature. This is called phase transition and is an ever-present process in 3-D objects.

However, what happens to 1D and 2-D systems at low temperatures? Do they experience a phase transition? In other words, are we going to see a transition from solid to liquid in a chain of water molecules (1D) or in a one-atom thick sheet of water (2-D)?

Raman spectroscopy on bulk (top, left) and 2D (top, right) FePS3 was used to calculate changes in vibration and indirectly magnetization. New peaks due to iron and magnetic ordering (P1 and P2) appear in the graph at temperatures below 118 Kelvin, the temperature below which the spins (red and blue arrows) become ordered with a zigzag pattern and the material becomes antiferromagnetic. Credit: Institute for Basic Science

About one century ago, the physicist Wilhelm Lenz asked his student Ernst Ising to solve this problem for 1D systems. Ising explained it in 1925 and concluded that 1D materials do not have phase transitions. Then, Ising tried to grapple with the same question for a particular type of 2-D materials. The problem turned out to be much harder. The solution came in 1943 courtesy of Lars Onsager, who received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1968. Indeed, Onsager found that the materials, which follow the Ising spin model, have a phase transition. However, despite the huge importance this theory has in the following development of the whole physics of , it has never been tested experimentally using a real magnetic material. "The physics of 2-D systems is unique and exciting. The Onsager solution is taught on every advanced statistical mechanics course. That's where I learned this problem. However, when I discovered much later that it has not been tested experimentally with a magnetic material, I thought it was a shame for experimentalists like me, so it was natural for me to look for a real material to test it," explains PARK Je-Geun.

In order to prove the Onsager model, the research team produced crystals of iron trithiohypophosphate (FePS3) with a technique called chemical vapour transport. The crystals are made of layers bound by weak interactions, known as Van der Waals interactions. Layers can be peeled off from the crystal by using scotch tape, in the same way tape can strip paint from a wall. The scientists peeled the layers until they were left with just one layer of FePS3 (2-D). "We can call these materials magnetic Van der Waals materials or magnetic graphene: they are magnetic and they have easy-to-cleave Van der Waals bonds between layers. They are very rare, and their physics is still unexplored," says the professor.

While there are several methods to measure the magnetic properties of bulk 3-D materials, these techniques have no practical use to measure magnetic signals coming from monolayer materials. Therefore, the team used Raman spectroscopy, a technique normally used to measure vibrations inside the material. They used vibrations as an indirect measure of magnetism, the more vibrations, the less magnetization.

Park's team and colleagues first used Raman spectroscopy on bulk 3-D FePS3 material at different temperatures and then tested FePS3 2-D monolayer. "The test with the bulk sample showed us that the Raman signals can be used as a kind of the fingerprint of phase transition at temperatures around 118 Kelvin, or minus 155 degrees Celsius. With this confirmation we then measured the monolayer sample and found the same patterns," points out Park. "We conclude that 3-D and 2-D FePS3 have the same signature of the phase transition visible in the Raman spectrum." Both in the bulk sample and the monolayer, FePS3' spins are ordered (antiferromagnetic) at very , and become disordered (paramagnetic) above 118 degrees Kelvin. "Showing magnetic phase transition with this tour-de-force experiment is a beautiful test for the Onsager solution," concludes the physicist.

In the future, the team would like to study other 2-D transition metal , going beyond the 2-D Ising spin model.

Explore further: First successful atomically thin sheets of magnetic Van der Waals material NiPS3

More information: Jae-Ung Lee et al. Ising-Type Magnetic Ordering in Atomically Thin FePS, Nano Letters (2016). DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03052

Related Stories

Novel state of matter: Observation of a quantum spin liquid

July 26, 2016

A novel and rare state of matter known as a quantum spin liquid has been empirically demonstrated in a monocrystal of the compound calcium-chromium oxide by team at HZB. According to conventional understanding, a quantum ...

Oxyhalides—a new class of high-tc multiferroic materials

June 21, 2016

Novel devices capable of rapidly and reliably switching magnetic states by acting on the electronic charge state are predicted to be of prime importance for tomorrow's data storage. Their realization will depend on the availability ...

Recommended for you

Nanotube fiber antennas as capable as copper

October 23, 2017

Fibers made of carbon nanotubes configured as wireless antennas can be as good as copper antennas but 20 times lighter, according to Rice University researchers. The antennas may offer practical advantages for aerospace applications ...

Resistive memory components the computer industry can't resist

October 23, 2017

Make way for some new memsistors. For years, the computer industry has sought memory technologies with higher endurance, lower cost, and better energy efficiency than commercial flash memories. Now, an international collaboration ...

Taming 'wild' electrons in graphene

October 23, 2017

Graphene - a one-atom-thick layer of the stuff in pencils - is a better conductor than copper and is very promising for electronic devices, but with one catch: Electrons that move through it can't be stopped.

Breakthrough in ultra-fast data processing at nanoscale

October 20, 2017

A research team from the National University of Singapore has recently invented a novel "converter" that can harness the speed and small size of plasmons for high frequency data processing and transmission in nanoelectronics.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (2) Jan 03, 2017
However, what happens to 1D and 2-D systems at low temperatures? Do they experience a phase transition? In other words, are we going to see a transition from solid to liquid in a chain of water molecules (1D) or in a one-atom thick sheet of water (2-D)?

The wording here is confusing. The paper isn't about a liquid/solid phase transition. It's about a magnetic phase transition (from paramagnetic to antiferromagnetic phase).
TheGhostofOtto1923
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 03, 2017
Speaking of fiddling with basic physics, Dr Mills and his infernal Dark Matter Engine were on CNN.
http://www.e-catw...l-video/

-So who's laughing now hahahahaha (me)
Da Schneib
not rated yet Jan 03, 2017
They also left out the name of the critical temperature above which the material no longer shows magnetism: the Curie point, or Curie temperature, named after its discoverer, Pierre Curie, the husband of the famous physicist Marie Curie.
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Jan 04, 2017
Speaking of fiddling with basic physics, Dr Mills and his infernal Dark Matter Engine were on CNN.
http://www.e-catw...l-video/

-So who's laughing now hahahahaha (me)

Bright light but no science!
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Jan 04, 2017
Magnetism is derived from a changing E field. There are only diametrical spherical fields and the centers are moving. Align the motion align the fields!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.