Ancient human disturbances may skew understanding of Amazon and its impact (Update)

January 10, 2017, Florida Institute of Technology
Lake El Salvador in Manu Biosphere Reserve, a national park in the Peruvian Amazon. The area surrounding the lake shows what a pristine forest may look like. Credit: Frazer Matthews-Bird

Pre-European human populations of the Amazon Basin may have affected our contemporary understanding of the forest's structure and composition, and thus our calculations of its impact on carbon dioxide remediation, according to new findings published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Researchers at Florida Institute of Technology, the University of Amsterdam, the University of Miami, and Wake Forest University report that forest plots in the Amazon Basin are primarily located in areas with a high probability of ancient human activity.

Our current understanding of the Amazon rainforest comes from a small network of fewer than 1,000 pieces of forest land spread out across the nearly 2.3-million-square-mile basin. Scientists have inventoried biodiversity and have been measuring how much and how fast Amazonian forests can absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere with the assumption that the plots were in their most pure state.

But if these plots are likely to have been disturbed by ancient people, which is what the new study implies, how much and how fast untouched Amazon forest can absorb carbon dioxide may not be completely accurate. Given the very long lifespan of some Amazonian trees, with some living for more than 400 years, many forest plot sites may still be recovering from past human disturbances. If so, these sites are growing faster than mature forests and may exaggerate the amount of carbon that can be absorbed by the forest as a whole.

Forest in Manu Biosphere Reserve, a national park in the Peruvian Amazon. The photo shows what a pristine forest in the Amazon Basin may look like. Credit: Frazer Matthews-Bird
"We have sampled less than 0.0005 percent of the Amazon Basin, and all that we know about its ecology comes from this limited forest plot network," said Crystal McMichael, the lead author and professor at the University of Amsterdam and a former research scientist at Florida Tech. "We may need to reevaluate what we know about biodiversity and carbon budgets given that many of these forests may still be recovering from past disturbance."

It is well known that the Amazon's pre-European population actively modified and transformed the forest before their population collapse around AD 1491. But the impact of ancient human activities has been largely neglected in many of the previous highly influential studies using Amazonian forest plots.

These new findings may necessitate a recalibration of previous readings of the benefits of the forests on carbon dioxide remediation.

"If inventory plots are located in areas likely occupied by past human populations, then we must look at the existing estimates of the Amazon forests to offset our release of as being overly optimistic," said Frazer Matthews-Bird, a biological sciences postdoctoral research associate at Florida Tech.

Explore further: Amazonia's best and worst areas for carbon recovery revealed

More information: Crystal N. H. McMichael et al. Ancient human disturbances may be skewing our understanding of Amazonian forests, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2017). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614577114

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Catalyst advance removes pollutants at low temperatures

March 25, 2019

Researchers at Washington State University, University of New Mexico, Eindhoven University of Technology, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have developed a catalyst that can both withstand high temperatures and convert ...

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 11, 2017
This article seems to conflict with another article advertiesd on this same page.Namely,
''Amazonian natives had little impact on land, new research finds''. dated October 28, 2015 \.
Soooo, which is it they did or they didn't?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.