Researchers may have found first polluted river from before Bronze Age

December 3, 2016, University of Waterloo
Wadi Faynan, Jordan, where researchers found evidence of ancient pollution caused by the combustion of copper.  Credit: Barqa Landscape Project/University of Waterloo.

Industrial pollution may seem like a modern phenomenon, but in fact, an international team of researchers may have discovered what could be the world's first polluted river, contaminated approximately 7,000 years ago.

In this now-dry riverbed in the Wadi Faynan region of southern Jordan, Professor Russell Adams, from the Department of Anthropology at the University of Waterloo, and his colleagues found evidence of early pollution caused by the combustion of copper. Neolithic humans here may have been in the early stages of developing metallurgy by learning how to smelt.

The research findings, published in Science of the Total Environment, shed light on a turning point in history, when humans began moving from making tools out of stones to making tools out of metal. This period, known as the Chalcolithic or Copper Age, is a transitional period between the late Neolithic or Stone Age and the beginning of the Bronze Age.

"These populations were experimenting with fire, experimenting with pottery and experimenting with copper ores, and all three of these components are part of the early production of copper metals from ores," said Adams. "The technological innovation and the spread of the adoption and use of metals in society mark the beginning of the modern world."

People created copper at this time by combining charcoal and the blue-green copper ore found in abundance in this area in pottery crucibles or vessels and heating the mixture over a fire. The process was time-consuming and labour-intensive and, for this reason, it took thousands of years before copper became a central part of human societies.

Many of the objects created in the earliest phase of copper production were primarily symbolic and fulfilled a social function within society. Attaining rare and exotic items was a way in which individuals attained prestige.

As time passed, communities in the region grew larger and expanded. People built mines, then large smelting furnaces and factories by about 2600 BC.

"This region is home to the world's first industrial revolution," said Adams. "This really was the centre of innovative technology."

But people paid a heavy price for the increased metal production. Slag, the waste product of smelting, remained. It contained metals such as copper, lead, zinc, cadmium, and even arsenic, mercury and thalium. Plants absorbed these metals, people and animals such as goats and sheep ate them, and so the contaminants bioaccumulated in the environment.

Adams believes the pollution from thousands of years of copper mining and production must have led to widespread health problems in ancient populations. Infertility, malformations and premature death would have been some of the effects. Researchers have found high levels of and lead in human bones dating back to the Roman period.

Adams and his international team of researchers are now trying to expand the analysis of the effects of this pollution to the Bronze Age, which began around 3200 BC. The Faynan region has a long history of human occupation, and the team is examining the extent and spread of this pollution at the time when metals and their industrial scale production became central to .

Explore further: Bacterial resistance to copper in the making for thousands of years

More information: J.P. Grattan et al, The first polluted river? Repeated copper contamination of fluvial sediments associated with Late Neolithic human activity in southern Jordan, Science of The Total Environment (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.106

Related Stories

Purifying contaminated water with crab shells

August 25, 2015

Copper and cadmium exist naturally in the environment, but human activities including industrial and agricultural processes can increase their concentrations. At high concentrations, copper can cause unwanted health effects ...

Recommended for you

Corals light the way to a healthy partnership

January 22, 2019

Corals know how to attract good company. New research finds that corals emit an enticing fluorescent green light that attracts the mobile microalgae, known as Symbiodinium, that are critical to the establishment of a healthy ...

For zombie microbes, deep-sea buffet is just out of reach

January 22, 2019

Far below the ocean floor, sediments are teeming with bizarre zombie-like microbes. Although they're technically alive, they grow in slow motion, and can take decades for a single cell to divide—something their cousins ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tblakely1357
1.3 / 5 (7) Dec 03, 2016
Funny how run off from volcanic eruptions aren't considered pollution.
gkam
1.3 / 5 (9) Dec 03, 2016
Wow, pollution back then? I did not think conservatism ran that far back. I guess we got it from the Neanderthals.
howhot3
5 / 5 (5) Dec 03, 2016
@gkam, it is kind of funny. But believe it or not, there is a copper based chemical that is used to kill tree roots in sewer pipes. (Copper Sulfate). Enough of it an it will kill a river and all vegetation along it. So the story isn't that far fetched.
aksdad
1.6 / 5 (7) Dec 04, 2016
Yah, industrial pollution of rivers is as old as mankind. It's the cleaning up of the rivers that's a modern phenomenon.
HeloMenelo
3.7 / 5 (3) Dec 04, 2016
Yah askdaddy posting another dumb comment, being an antigoricle gorilla sock, it's no wonder ;)
ForFreeMinds
1 / 5 (2) Dec 04, 2016
"Slag, the waste product of smelting, remained. It contained metals such as copper, lead, zinc, cadmium, and even arsenic, mercury and thalium. Plants absorbed these metals, people and animals such as goats and sheep ate them, and so the contaminants bioaccumulated in the environment."

I'm curious, considering these metals exist in the rocks used to create copper, how is it that plants growing near the rocks didn't do the same thing before humans smelted the rock?
dudester
5 / 5 (1) Dec 05, 2016
@FFM
The plants did, when the surface of the rock became exposed, probably millions of years ago. Then, according to the article,7000 years ago, miners exposed a lot of surface in a very short time by fracturing the rocks.


Geologic erosion is a slow process.

However, when humans excavate sequestered materials and apply high temperatures (in itself an industrial activity-- as fuel such as charcoal has to be processed and smelting ovens constructed), chemical reactions not usually found outside of volcanic conditions create many products and byproducts that are then released into the environment.

As is so often the case, new technologies are like motor vehicles that are able to go so fast they outpace the range of the headlights, and unforeseen effects like toxic pollution can, like a rock slide, be lying in the path ahead.

We are only now finding out how badly we have screwed the pooch with plastic.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.