Mountain glaciers are showing some of the strongest responses to climate change

December 12, 2016, University of Washington
Austria's Hintereisferner Glacier has retreated 2.8 km (1.75 miles) since 1880. The new study finds a 0.001 percent probability, or one chance in 100,000, that it could have happened without climate change. Credit: Whgler/Wikimedia

Mountain glaciers have long been a favorite poster child of climate change. The near-global retreat of glaciers of the last century provides some of the most iconic imagery for communicating the reality of human-driven climate change.

But the scientific basis for their retreat has been less clear. Glaciers respond slowly to any climate changes, they are susceptible to year-to-year variations in mountain weather, and some of the largest are still catching up after the end of the Little Ice Age. Scientists can connect climate change to the overall retreat of worldwide, but linking an individual glacier's retreat to climate change has remained a subject of debate.

The last report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded only that it was "likely" that a "substantial" part of mountain glacier retreat is due to human-induced climate change—a much weaker conclusion than for temperature and other things.

Now, using statistical techniques to analyze 37 around the world, a University of Washington study finds that for most of them the observed retreat is more than 99 percent likely due to climate change. In the climate report's wording, it is "virtually certain" that the retreat of these mountain glaciers is due to climate change over the past century.

"Because of their decades-long response times, we found that glaciers are actually among the purest signals of climate change," said Gerard Roe, a UW professor of Earth and space sciences. He is corresponding author of the study published Dec. 12 in Nature Geoscience, and presented this week at the American Geophysical Union's annual fall meeting in San Francisco.

The orange line shows the glacier length changes expected is there were no climate change. The purple bar marks the observed retreat of seven North American glaciers included in the study. Credit: Gerard Roe/University of Washington

The new study analyzes specific glaciers with a history of length observations, and nearby weather records of temperature and precipitation. The authors also sought different glacier locations, focusing on roughly seven glaciers in each of five geographic regions: North America, Europe, Asia, Scandinavia and the Southern Hemisphere.

"We evaluate glaciers which are hanging on at high altitudes in the deserts of Asia as well as glaciers that are being beaten up by midlatitude storms in maritime climate settings," Roe said. "The thickness, slope and area of the glaciers are different, and all of those things affect the size of the glacier length fluctuations."

Co-authors are Florian Herla , an undergraduate student at the University of Innsbruck in Austria, and Marcia Baker, a UW professor emeritus of atmospheric sciences and Earth and space sciences.

The authors used statistical tools to compare the natural, weather-induced variations in a glacier's length with its observed changes over the last 130 years, and establish a signal-to-noise ratio. They then use that to calculate the probability that observed retreats would have happened without any background change in the climate.

The iconic Hintereisferner Glacier in Austria has retreated 2.8 km (1.75 miles) since 1880. Results show that climate change is extremely likely to be responsible for its retreat, with the probability that the changes are natural variations being less than 0.001 percent, or one in 100,000.

The orange line shows the probability of different glacier retreats without any change in the climate. The purple bar marks the observed retreat of the European glaciers included in the study. Credit: Gerard Roe/University of Washington

Likewise, for the well-known Franz Josef Glacier in New Zealand, even though the glacier has experienced re-advances of up to 1 kilometer (0.6 miles) in a given decade, there is a less than 1 percent chance that natural variations could explain the overall 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) retreat in the last 130 years.

The least significant retreats among the glaciers studied were for Rabots Glacier in northern Sweden, and South Cascade Glacier in Washington state, with probabilities of 11 and 6 percent, respectively, that their retreats might be natural variability.

"South Cascade is at the end of the Pacific storm track, and it experiences a high degree of wintertime variability. Average wintertime snowfall generates about 3 meters (10 feet) of ice per year, whereas for glaciers in desert Asia, ice accumulation might be as low as 10 centimeters (4 inches) per year," Roe said. "So they're experiencing very different climate settings. As a result, their variability, and also their sensitivity to climate change, varies from place to place."

The method uses a signal-to-noise ratio that relies on observational records for glacier length, local weather, and the basic size and shape of the glacier, but does not require detailed computer modeling. The technique could be used on any glacier that had enough observations.

Overall, the results show that changes in the 37 glaciers' lengths are between two and 15 standard deviations away from their statistical means. That represents some of the highest signal-to-noise ratios yet documented in natural systems' response to .

"Even though the scientific analysis arguably hasn't always been there, it now turns out that it really is true—we can look at these glaciers all around us that we see retreating, and see definitive evidence that the climate is changing," Roe said. "That's why people have noticed it. These glaciers are stunningly far away from where they would have been in a preindustrial climate."

Explore further: Image: Sentinel-2A captures Upsala Glacier

More information: Nature Geoscience, nature.com/articles/doi:10.1038/ngeo2863

Related Stories

Human contribution to glacier mass loss on the increase

August 14, 2014

By combining climate and glacier models, scientists headed by Ben Marzeion from the University of Innsbruck have found unambiguous evidence for anthropogenic glacier mass loss in recent decades. In a paper published in Science, ...

Recommended for you

Rainfall's natural variation hides climate change signal

February 22, 2018

New research from The Australian National University (ANU) and ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science suggests natural rainfall variation is so great that it could take a human lifetime for significant climate ...

Seasonal patterns in the Amazon explained

February 22, 2018

Environmental scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory have led an international collaboration to improve satellite observations of tropical forests.

14 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mark Thomas
5 / 5 (6) Dec 12, 2016
The Franz Josef Glacier in New Zealand mentioned in the article is a good example, at least in part, because it has been well visited and photographed for at least a 100 years. I can confirm that melting there has proceeded at a very rapid pace since at least 2004.

"Tourists banned from hiking on stunning New Zealand glaciers that have been popular attractions for more than a century because the ice is melting too quickly." (2016)

http://www.dailym...ing.html
antigoracle
1 / 5 (5) Dec 12, 2016
The Franz Josef Glacier in New Zealand mentioned in the article is a good example.....blah...blah...

Uh huh. Never mind that it was hotter in New Zealand during the 1920s.
ForFreeMinds
1 / 5 (6) Dec 12, 2016
"a University of Washington study finds that for most of them the observed retreat is more than 99 percent likely due to climate change"

Of course, what else would one expect? This statement fails to distinguish between natural climate change and man made climate change. It seems they the authors want people to think it is due to human induced climate change, especially those funding their work.
gkam
2.7 / 5 (7) Dec 12, 2016
Mountain glaciers provide water to more than a billion people.

Those who try to minimize the danger are wrong.
snoosebaum
1 / 5 (5) Dec 12, 2016
glaciers have been melting near me for a lot longer than 100 yrs and i can show you .
gkam
2.7 / 5 (7) Dec 12, 2016
I think you miss the point. When they are gone, how much water will flow in the large rivers feeding large populations?
antigoracle
1 / 5 (3) Dec 12, 2016
Mountain glaciers have long been a favorite poster child of climate change

Uh huh, poster child, because it's so easy to blatantly LIE to their ignorant hungry Chicken Littles.

https://www.googl...epyo6gBA
ddaye
5 / 5 (5) Dec 12, 2016
glaciers have been melting near me for a lot longer than 100 yrs and i can show you .

So what? Incidentally we've been burning fossil carbon and clearing trees from the planet for a lot longer than 100 years as well.
gkam
1.8 / 5 (5) Dec 12, 2016
snoosebaum
not rated yet Dec 13, 2016
Fits with this , interesting
http://realclimat...re-1950/
gkam
1 / 5 (4) Dec 13, 2016
Well, gosh, I went there, and saw nothing to change my mind. What was the point, that glaciers have been receding for centuries? Okay, but now look at the sustained speed of them, not rare bursts.

So,we should not try to slow them down? Do you understand how many people on Earth depend on their water in Asia and South America?
snoosebaum
not rated yet Dec 13, 2016
well, sustained speed of them over centuries then. Meanwhile lots of handwringing over things getting a tiny bit warmer whilst our precious animals ,elephants , rhinos ,now giraffes go extinct from human overpopulation , and hardly a word from jetset GW screamers .
gkam
1 / 5 (4) Dec 13, 2016
Perhaps I can send you to some eco-news sites? The climate problem was just added to the extinction problem.

Where have you been?
SteveS
not rated yet Dec 14, 2016
Fits with this , interesting
http://realclimat...re-1950/


If you find that article interesting you will probably find these pictures of Jakobshavn glacier more informative.

http://psjfactoid...big.html

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.