Decades of attempts show how hard it is to land on Mars – here's how we plan to succeed in 2021

Decades of attempts show how hard it is to land on Mars – here's how we plan to succeed in 2021
Mars seen by the Viking orbiter. Credit: NASA/JPL/USGS

Europe has been trying to land on Mars since 2003, but none of the attempts have gone exactly according to plan. A couple of months ago, the ExoMars Schiaparelli landing demonstrator crashed onto the planet's surface, losing contact with its mothership. However, the mission was partially successful, providing information that will enable Europe and Russia to land its ExoMars rover on the Red Planet in 2021.

Now European research ministers have finally agreed to give the mission the outstanding €400m it needs to go ahead. A lot is at stake as the rover is poised to uniquely drill under the harsh Martian surface to search for signs of past, or even present, life. With the best of human endeavour, we must learn, try again and not give up. As leader of the international Panoramic Camera team on the rover, which will among other things provide surface geological and atmospheric context for the mission, I am one of many scientists working very hard to make it work. PanCam is one of nine state-of-the-art instruments which will help us analyse subsurface samples.

The reason it is so hard to land on Mars is that the atmospheric pressure is low, less than 1% of Earth's surface pressure. This means that any probe will descend very rapidly to the surface, and must be slowed. What's more, the landing has to be done autonomously as the light travel time from Earth is three to 22 minutes. This delay transmission means we can't steer the rapid process from Earth. NASA and Russia have had their own problems with landings in the past, before the spectacular successes with the US missions Viking, Pathfinder, Spirit,Opportunity, Phoenix and Curiosity.

Lessons learned

Europe's first attempt to land on Mars was with Beagle 2 on Christmas day 2003. Until recently the last we had seen of the lander was on December 19, 2003 – imaged soon after separation from the Mars Express mothership. Mars Express itself was a huge success, entering orbit on December 25 that year and operating ever since. It has revolutionised our knowledge of Mars with stereo images, mineral mapping, studies of plasma escape from the planet's atmosphere and the first detection of methane.

Decades of attempts show how hard it is to land on Mars – here's how we plan to succeed in 2021
ExoMars close-up of a large unnamed crater north near the Mars equator. Credit: ESA/Roscosmos/ExoMars/CaSSIS/UniBE, CC BY-SA

Recently, the Beagle 2 lander was imaged by NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on the surface – tantalisingly close to success, with only one of the four solar panels left undeployed. Unfortunately, the communications antenna was underneath that vital panel, preventing communications with Mars Express and Earth. Beagle 2 probably operated for a day or two at least, and may have taken its first panorama with our stereo camera system and its pop-up mirror.

Then, on October 19 this year, Schiaparelli tried to land. Using lessons learned from Beagle, detailed data were transmitted during the descent, after separation from the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter mothership. The early parts were successful – we know that the heat-protective tiles did their job during entry into the thin Mars atmosphere, and that the parachute deployed as planned.

But then, unexpected spinning motion was detected for unknown reasons, the parachute was ejected early and the retro rockets were fired briefly. Despite altimeter and speed measurements, the on-board control computer became confused (saturated) over a second-long period and thought Schiaparelli had reached the surface already. Unfortunately, the craft was still 3.7km high, the retro rockets shut off early and Schiaparelli fell to the surface – impacting at over 300km/h. More lessons learned, the hard way. As the controllers now know exactly what went wrong, they are using the transmitted data to determine why and figure out how to avoid it happening again.

Meanwhile, the Trace Gas Orbiter successfully entered Mars orbit. Last week it sent its first stunningly promising images and data from its first close Mars encounter. Its final orbit will be a 400km circular orbit to be achieved in March 2018. This will involve a tricky, fuel-free braking process called "aerobraking" (which involves dragging the spacecraft through the top of the atmosphere in order to use the friction from the gas molecules to slow it down).

The spacecraft's mission is to find out more about the surprising trace gases, including the methane. Methane should not be present in Mars' atmosphere, as it is broken up by sunlight in tens to hundreds of years, so there must be a source of it there now. The possible options are both exciting – it could either be geothermal activity or microbial lifeforms.

Decades of attempts show how hard it is to land on Mars – here's how we plan to succeed in 2021
Mars rover being tested near the Paranal Observatory. Credit: ESO/G. Hudepohl, CC BY-SA

Searching for life

The rover itself is the jewel in the crown of the ExoMars programme, planned for launch in 2020 and arriving in 2021. There are similarities and differences with earlier landing systems, which will again use lessons learned from earlier missions.

The rover has a unique drill which will collect samples from up to two metres underneath the harsh Martian surface. This is 40 times deeper than anything else planned – the Curiosity rover can only drill five centimetres. This is below where ultraviolet light and other radiation from our sun and galaxy – which is harmful to life – can reach. It is the most likely of any planned mission to finally answer the question of whether there was, or even is, life on Mars.

The possible landing sites have been narrowed down by engineering constraints but from a number of possibilities three now remain – Oxia Planum, Mawrth Valles and Aram Dorsum. At the first two of these, data from orbit shows signs of water-rich clays (phyllosilicates), and the last one includes an ancient channel and sedimentary deposits – signs of past water erosion. The options will be narrowed down further in the next few months.

The mission is one of the most exciting in the search for life beyond Earth. Along with Jupiter's moon Europa and Saturn's satellite Enceladus, Mars is one of the top locations to look. Moreover, the hardware development progress is good, with industry and academia pushing the frontiers of technology, pursuing the international teamwork needed to build and operate the mission, and learning how to work in super-clean rooms to avoid contaminating Mars with terrestrial spores.

We learn from the past and plan for the future. Space exploration is hard, particularly at Mars, and we must never give up. The ExoMars rover mission will play a key part internationally in Mars exploration, and using the lessons from the past we are poised to find the answer to one of mankind's most important questions – are we alone in the universe? Our rover might just find the answer.


Explore further

Euro-Russian craft enters Mars orbit, but lander's fate unknown

Provided by The Conversation

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation: Decades of attempts show how hard it is to land on Mars – here's how we plan to succeed in 2021 (2016, December 5) retrieved 19 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-12-decades-hard-mars.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
109 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 05, 2016
One of the problems landing on Mars is slowing the craft down, right? They have skip along the outer edge of the tenuous atmosphere, requiring a heavy heat shield.

Serious question: what if they tried a different approach? How about beginning to slow the craft down at the halfway point so that when it arrives, it's going slowly relative to Mars. While it would require more fuel, a lot of the weight for that fuel could be offset by much lighter shielding.

If they calculated the route properly, with the final approach chasing Mars from behind in its orbit, it could enter the atmosphere straight on but gently enough to deploy parachutes right away.

Sure, total flight time would increase, but a little patience might result in more successful soft landings. If they're still not confident about the retro-rocket landing they used with Curiosity, they could go back to the bouncing balloon trick they used for Spirit and Oppo.

I must be missing something.

Dec 06, 2016
Um, didn't the Apollo 11 Lunar Module's computer have an 'overload' condition on final approach ? IIRC, Neil Armstrong promptly took over and did the biz...

Oh, and dodged several car-sized boulders that would have seriously spoiled a robot's day.

I'm not saying 'Do Crewed', merely that Mars landers will have to be much, much smarter...

Dec 07, 2016
Just a niggle:
That 'chute will achieve a terminal velocity of ~150 km/h at maybe 5km height

That would be on Earth. On Mars (with only 1% of the atmospheric density) the terminal velocity is much higher - though you have to subtract a bit because gravity is lower.. But still, it comes out to about 1000km/h
https://spaceflig...mvr.html
...which in turn means that you need a bit more fuel to get down to safe landing speeds from terminal velocity than on Earth. (Note that 'safe landing speed' is about 3 times higher on Mars than on Earth due to reduced gravity...but the deceleration itself does not benefit from the low gravity as that is just a delta in mv^2. )

Dec 07, 2016
Ummm, I think I ought to add a note here to say that I was agreeing with @Phys1, and then adding some more to my replies to @geokstr... I hope that's clear.

BTW, how does one find out who has marked a post up or down? Darned if I know...


@ Fine-Skippy. That was me that give you the "1" down votes. It was a big mistake for me and I am sorry about that. I was meaning to give you the up votes because you make good posts. Sorry about that. You can give to me a couple of down votes to make it even.

Dec 07, 2016
Hi Ira, hey that's OK, poop happens :)

So, I see on here occasionally that a poster has spotted just exactly who gave him an up or down vote - have I got that right? ...and if so, how's that done? Anybody?


https://sciencex....ml?v=act

You can get on that link for anybody by clicking on there name over on the side of their comment and then click on the "ALL" button.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more