Tritium introduced in fusion experiments at Sandia

Tritium introduced in fusion experiments at Sandia
Sandia National Laboratories principal investigator Dean Rovang checks out the Z Machine’s tritium gas transfer system, which was built at the labs’ Livermore, California, site and filled with trace tritium (0.1 percent) at Sandia in Albuquerque. Credit: Randy Montoya

Researchers at Sandia National Laboratories Z Machine have opened a new chapter in their 20-year journey toward higher fusion outputs by introducing tritium, the most neutron-laden isotope of hydrogen, to their targets' fuel.

When Z fires, its huge electromagnetic field crushes pre-warmed fuel, forcing it to fuse. Tritium-enriched fuel should release many more neutrons than previous maximums at Z, already among the highest in the world.

"This thing about creating energy where none existed before—we don't yet have a bonfire, but we're squirting starter on the grill," said Mike Cuneo, senior manager of Sandia's Pulsed Power Accelerator Science and Technology group.

The output of Z has been used over decades to provide information for computer simulations that test the readiness of America's nuclear stockpile without exploding an actual weapon. It's also used by astrophysicists using the machine's momentarily astounding pressures and temperatures to understand conditions in stars and the cores of planets. And some hope that pressures created mainly by electricity and magnetism one day may reach nuclear fusion conditions suitable for energy production; this condition is called "high yield."

The introduction of tritium is of high technical interest because a 50/50 mix of tritium and deuterium—the two isotopes of hydrogen—emits 80 times more neutrons, and 500 times more energy, than deuterium alone. Energy from deuterium—in a manner of speaking, a relatively low-octane fuel—has been the upper limit on output at Z.

But it's still early days. A dry run in July, testing containment hardware and instrumentation, preceded Z's first tritium experiment three weeks later, when a fraction of a percent was cautiously introduced into the experiment's fuel.

"We're going to crawl before we walk and run," said Cuneo. "We will gradually increase that fraction in contained experiments as we go."

Only two other Department of Energy-supported, high-energy-density research sites, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Laboratory for Laser Energetics at the University of Rochester, had been approved to use tritium, a potential environmental hazard.

The Sandia experiments use electromagnetics to smash Z's more massive target and its entire target support area like they were hit by a sledgehammer. Unlike the laser facilities, the  Z chamber must be entered by personnel after each experiment to refurbish the facility for the next experiment. Under those conditions, introducing tritium into the target requires extreme care and forethought in the design, transport and containment of tritium to meet rigorous safety standards.

Tritium introduced in fusion experiments at Sandia
Two fast neutron radiation-effects cassettes aim toward the center of the containment system for tritium within the Z vacuum chamber at Sandia National Laboratories. The setup’s gas transfer system is housed within the containment system. Credit: Sandia National Laboratories

"Tritium's like sand at the beach, it gets into everything," said Cuneo. "So for now, we can't let it go anywhere." The isotope is a small molecule with a lot of mobility, and the first big hurdle, he says, is to make sure the radioactive material with its 12-year half-life doesn't migrate to the million-gallon pools of water and oil that insulate Z's pulsed power components. "Laser facilities don't have these pools," he pointed out.

Tritium also could bond to the metal walls of Z's central area, presenting a potential radioactive hazard where technicians enter daily to scrub after each shot.

However, using the same unique design that has contained plutonium on more than a dozen previous Z shots, no tritium was released.

Nearly 100 Sandia personnel contributed directly to the effort, funded through Sandia's Laboratory Directed Research and Development program. Also participating were researchers from General Atomics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, the University of New Mexico and Utah State University.

Future work will be funded by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

"There was a high level of integration on facility containment and radiation protection, to do it right," said Brent Jones, facility integration lead. "The Sandia-California gas transfer group, with decades of experience dealing with tritium, developed a method of housing, delivering and containing the material. They built a device that could load a small but defined quantity of tritium; the neutron generator people filled the target with tritium; and the plutonium confinement folks contributed their shot expertise."

The team now must evaluate whether tritium can be used safely in uncontained experiments, their ultimate goal. Confined tests can evaluate the compatibility of tritium with Z's materials and pressures, but don't accurately measure fusion outputs.

"The use of contained tritium on Z is the first step on this journey," said Cuneo. "There is much more work to do.

"Similar to what is done at the laser [fusion] facilities, one idea [for an uncontained experiment] is to purge the tritium immediately after a shot so that it doesn't stick to the walls of the Z chamber. We need to be able to efficiently purge the center section back to a safe level before technicians enter to refurbish it."

Uncontained experiments will begin with very small levels of tritium and gradually ramp up in a several-year process. "We hope to find that we will able to safely handle 1-3 percent tritium in uncontained experiments, enough to advance Inertial Confinement Fusion applications, other weapons science applications and neutron effects testing," Cuneo said.

It will be at least three years before experiments approach the 50/50 mix of and deuterium, depending on funding and Sandia and NNSA priorities for Z.

Explore further

Scientists create method to obtain the most precise data for thermonuclear reactors

Citation: Tritium introduced in fusion experiments at Sandia (2016, November 9) retrieved 22 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 09, 2016
You just now are introducing tritium to the fuel? Ummm ... okay.

Nov 25, 2016
Actually the Sandia Nat.Lab. fusion quest is at least 30 years old (not 20), and for that entire period they have promised to "leapfrog tokamaks." While tritium is surely radioactive and elusive, how can any group claim it's about to make a fusion reactor when it is deathly afraid of using tritium?

The TFTR and JET tokamaks used 50-50 D-T in the 1990's— twenty years ago! This article states that it will be at least three years before Sandia dares to use that mixture!!

The energy gain by using 50-50 DT is 250 times greater than for D-only (not 500 times). The Sandia crowd has forgotten (or never knew) that there is a second D-D reaction with the same reactivity as the neutron-producing reaction.

Nov 25, 2016
The maximum fusion energy gain Q = (fusion energy produced/ injected energy) that the Z machine has achieved is ~1E-5 in D-D, calculated from results reported elsewhere. That's the same Q you get by bombarding a deuterated metal target with D beams! You can get the same performance for less than 1% of the cost of the Z machine, and on a continuous basis instead of a few shots per day, each of which destroys part of the apparatus.

When Sandia finally screws up enough courage to use 50-50 D-T, they will have the same Q you get by bombarding a tritiated metal target with D beams, again for less than 1% of the cost.

Ironically, even Sandia used to make a compact beam-target neutron source called the Neuristor.

Nov 27, 2016
Tritium also could bond to the metal walls of Z's central area, presenting a potential radioactive hazard where technicians enter daily to scrub after each shot.

Seriously? They're talking about amounts of tritium measured in the atoms, and the radioactivity is all low energy beta (5.7kEv). It can't pass 6 millimeters of air.

For some odd reason, the US offical safety limits regarding tritium are extremely low. The amount of tritium allowed in drinking water is 740 bq/L when the World Health Organization considers levels up to 10000 bq/L safe. The US level is 1.3% of natural background radiation.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more