DNA analysis of ancient teeth shows dogs gained ability to digest starches at the same time as humans

November 9, 2016 by Bob Yirka report
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers from France, Sweden and Romania has found genetic evidence that indicates that domesticated dogs developed an ability to digest starch during the same time period as humans. In their paper published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, the team describes how they conducted a DNA analysis of ancient dog teeth and other bones and what they found by doing so.

Prior research has suggested that and humans became companions approximately 15,000 years ago—a time during which people were still hunter-gatherers. This meant that both humans and dogs were still eating mostly meat, though the dogs were likely getting mostly left-overs.

Three years ago, a team in Sweden found that domestic dogs have many more copies of the gene AQmy2B than wolves—the gene is known to be involved in helping to digest starches, which suggested that dogs have evolved in a way that allows them to more easily co-exist with humans (who also have many more copies of the gene than other carnivores.) More recent research has shown that wild dogs, coyotes and wolves have just two copies of the Amy3B gene, suggesting the domestic dog's ability to digest starch is truly unique among canines.

In this new effort, the researchers wondered how far back in time dogs developed the extra gene copies. To find out, they obtained teeth and bone fossils from dog and wolf specimens that have been dug up from various sites in Eurasia and which had been dated back to 5,000 to 7,000 years ago. By conducting a DNA analysis of the fossils, the researchers found that at least four of the dogs had at least eight copies of the gene—they were not able to discover how many copies the wolves had. This finding by the researchers overturns theories that have suggested that the gene evolved in dogs in more modern times as humans bred them to bring about many more breeds.

The finding also indicates that dogs likely developed a means for digesting starches during the same time period as did humans, a sign that dogs and humans were co-existing and that both were gaining an ability to live at least partly off the crops that humans learned to grow.

Explore further: Genes underlying dogs' social ability revealed

More information: Morgane Ollivier et al. copy number variation reveals starch diet adaptations in ancient European dogs, Royal Society Open Science (2016). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160449

Abstract
Extant dog and wolf DNA indicates that dog domestication was accompanied by the selection of a series of duplications on the Amy2B gene coding for pancreatic amylase. In this study, we used a palaeogenetic approach to investigate the timing and expansion of the Amy2B gene in the ancient dog populations of Western and Eastern Europe and Southwest Asia. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to estimate the copy numbers of this gene for 13 ancient dog samples, dated to between 15 000 and 4000 years before present (cal. BP). This evidenced an increase of Amy2B copies in ancient dogs from as early as the 7th millennium cal. BP in Southeastern Europe. We found that the gene expansion was not fixed across all dogs within this early farming context, with ancient dogs bearing between 2 and 20 diploid copies of the gene. The results also suggested that selection for the increased Amy2B copy number started 7000 years cal. BP, at the latest. This expansion reflects a local adaptation that allowed dogs to thrive on a starch rich diet, especially within early farming societies, and suggests a biocultural coevolution of dog genes and human culture.

Related Stories

Genes underlying dogs' social ability revealed

September 29, 2016

The social ability of dogs is affected by genes that also seems to influence human behaviour, according to a new study from Linköping University in Sweden. The scientists have found a relationship between five different ...

Myth of tolerant dogs and aggressive wolves refuted

April 21, 2015

Dogs are regarded as more tolerant and less aggressive compared to their ancestors, the wolves. Researchers from the Messerli Research Institute at the Vetmeduni Vienna question this image. They show in a recent study that ...

Recommended for you

Mammal long thought extinct in Australia resurfaces

December 15, 2017

A crest-tailed mulgara, a small carnivorous marsupial known only from fossilised bone fragments and presumed extinct in NSW for more than century, has been discovered in Sturt National Park north-west of Tibooburra.

Finding a lethal parasite's vulnerabilities

December 15, 2017

An estimated 100 million people around the world are infected with Strongyloides stercoralis, a parasitic nematode, yet it's likely that many don't know it. The infection can persist for years, usually only causing mild symptoms. ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

FredJose
1 / 5 (4) Nov 15, 2016
Prior research has suggested that dogs and humans became companions approximately 15,000 years ago—a time during which people were still hunter-gatherers. This meant that both humans and dogs were still eating mostly meat, though the dogs were likely getting mostly left-overs

As per usual, the researchers will eventually gravitate towards the truth and will disguise their admittance with all kinds of subtle and sophisticated jargon:

Genesis 1:29-30 clearly indicates that both man, animals, birds and other things were vegetarian from the start - "Then God said, "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food"; and it was so"
Just as he created them male and female right from the start.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (4) Nov 15, 2016
As per usual, the researchers will eventually gravitate towards the truth

Ya know. That's what science is for (not in the way you have in mind, though...but then again: your mind is so closed off it doesn't matter)

Genesis 1:29-30 clearly indicates

Oh puhleeese. Why don't you quote Dr. Seuss as a reference while you're at it. Makes about as much sense.

I wonder what you're doing on a science comment section, anyways. You don't know anything about science and clearly also don't care about science. All you're accomplishing is making a fool of yourself. If that is your intent then: Bravo. You are doing a really good job.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.