Researchers posit way to locally circumvent Second Law of Thermodynamics

October 20, 2016 by Louise Lerner
Argonne scientists Ivan Sadovskyy (left) and Valerii Vinokur published a paper showing a mathematical construction to a possible local violation of the Second Law of the Thermodynamics. One implication for the research could be a way to one day remotely power a device -- that is, the energy expended to light the lamp could take place anywhere. Credit: Mark Lopez/Argonne National Laboratory

For more than a century and a half of physics, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that entropy always increases, has been as close to inviolable as any law we know. In this universe, chaos reigns supreme.

But researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Argonne National Laboratory announced recently that they may have discovered a little loophole in this famous maxim.

Their research, published in Scientific Reports, lays out a possible avenue to a situation where the Second Law is violated on the microscopic level.

The Second Law is underpinned by what is called the H-theorem, which says that if you open a door between two rooms, one hot and one cold, they will eventually settle into lukewarm equilibrium; the hot room will never end up hotter.

But even in the twentieth century, as our knowledge of quantum mechanics advanced, we didn't fully understand the fundamental physical origins of the H-theorem.

Recent advancements in a field called quantum information theory offered a mathematical construction in which entropy increases.

"What we did was formulate how these beautiful abstract mathematical theories could be connected to our crude reality," said Valerii Vinokur, an Argonne Distinguished Fellow and corresponding author on the study.

The scientists took quantum information theory, which is based on abstract mathematical systems, and applied it to , a well-explored field with many known laws and experiments.

"This allowed us to formulate the quantum H-theorem as it related to things that could be physically observed," said Ivan Sadovskyy, a joint appointee with Argonne's Materials Science Division and the Computation Institute and another author on the paper. "It establishes a connection between well-documented quantum physics processes and the theoretical quantum channels that make up ."

The work predicts certain conditions under which the H-theorem might be violated and entropy—in the short term—might actually decrease.

As far back as 1867, physicist James Clerk Maxwell described a hypothetical way to violate the Second Law: if a small theoretical being sat at the door between the hot and cold rooms and only let through particles traveling at a certain speed. This theoretical imp is called "Maxwell's demon."

"Although the violation is only on the local scale, the implications are far-reaching," Vinokur said. "This provides us a platform for the practical realization of a quantum Maxwell's demon, which could make possible a local quantum perpetual motion machine."

For example, he said, the principle could be designed into a "refrigerator" which could be cooled remotely—that is, the energy expended to cool it could take place anywhere.

The authors are planning to work closely with a team of experimentalists to design a proof-of-concept system, they said.

The study, "H-theorem in quantum physics," was published September 12 in Nature Scientific Reports.

Explore further: Small entropy changes allow quantum measurements to be nearly reversed

More information: G. B. Lesovik et al, H-theorem in quantum physics, Scientific Reports (2016). DOI: 10.1038/srep32815

Related Stories

Maxwell's demon can use quantum information to generate work

December 18, 2013

(Phys.org) —In theory, Maxwell's demon can decrease the entropy of a system by opening and closing a door at appropriate times to separate hot and cold gas molecules. But as physicist Leó Szilárd pointed out in 1929, ...

Physicists create first photonic Maxwell's demon

February 12, 2016

(Phys.org)—Maxwell's demon, a hypothetical being that appears to violate the second law of thermodynamics, has been widely studied since it was first proposed in 1867 by James Clerk Maxwell. But most of these studies have ...

Recommended for you

Visualizing single molecules in whole cells with a new spin

December 12, 2017

Cell biologists traditionally use fluorescent dyes to label and visualize cells and the molecules within them under a microscope. With different super-resolution microscopy methods, they can even light up single molecules ...

Two holograms in one surface

December 12, 2017

A team at Caltech has figured out a way to encode more than one holographic image in a single surface without any loss of resolution. The engineering feat overturns a long-held assumption that a single surface could only ...

14 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Andrew Palfreyman
1 / 5 (1) Oct 20, 2016
Experimental proof or it didn't happen
BackBurner
not rated yet Oct 21, 2016
A "team of experimentalists"?

Experimentalists?
phi-stee
4.3 / 5 (6) Oct 21, 2016
A "team of experimentalists"?

Experimentalists?


That's right, it's a word, take the opportunity to increase your vocabulary.
manfredparticleboard
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 21, 2016
That's right! Just like researchermerizers is a word.
Anonym
5 / 5 (1) Oct 21, 2016
Experimentalists are experimenters with a mental condition.
KBK
not rated yet Oct 23, 2016
Chaos does not really reign supreme but the unidirectionality of energy expression, and it's compatriot, the thing we call time...those two tend to be fairly well tied at the hip.

Thus the 'second law'. But it can be violated, it involves resonance manipulation and then gating the energies of the firmament. There are many stories of such methodologies being used to enable Maxwell's demon. Complex accelerations in resonance being used as coupling devices to affect time and mass changes, to 'diode pump' the energies involved.

There are many examples to peruse, if one steps out of their textbook analysis. Which is obvious as requirements go. The dogmatic canon of 'second law' requires investigation outside of the canon, as the canon locks the door in a logic loop.

It's a simple point in straightforward logic if one steps outside of the mainstream. The problem is human, not one of logic or analysis.
ExNuke
not rated yet Oct 23, 2016
"experimentalists" can come up with a "proof" that gravity can work backwards at sufficently small scales but it won't stop you from falling from your ladder.
optical
Oct 23, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
optical
Oct 23, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Lex Talonis
1 / 5 (2) Oct 24, 2016
Experimentalists are experimenters with a mental condition.


Yah - they are sidekick.
swordsman
not rated yet Oct 24, 2016
Failure to understand entropy, which has certain conditions upon which it occurs. Change those conditions, and you change the theory.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Oct 24, 2016
Failure to understand entropy, which has certain conditions upon which it occurs. Change those conditions, and you change the theory.


Could you be a tad more unspecific, please.
/s
luke_w_bradley
1 / 5 (2) Oct 25, 2016
This is awesome work, on the part of these theorists. (Will I get in trouble for using that work too?) ;)

I have seen a perpetual motion fountain, made out of superfluid helium.
https://www.youtu...#t=1m28s
It emerges from the macro scale quantum effects in this material, and can only last as long as its cooled to that point, but its pretty interesting that we're not barred from breaking these other laws if we stack the quantum deck in the right way.
TheGhostofOtto1923
5 / 5 (2) Oct 25, 2016
In a somewhat related vein, a gentleman at a place called Massey university which is somewhere where they speak American with a funny accent, gave this lecture in support of everybody's second favorite voodoo energy crackpot Dr Randall mills and his infernal hydrino engine
http://webcast.ma...8f26811d

-And I'm required to add that neither physorg nor otto in any endorse this presentation just by causing it to be viewed by the world. But I think we both can say it's pretty provocative and it does mention thermodynamics.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.