Study pinpoints why naked mole rats feel no pain

October 11, 2016, Cell Press
Naked mole rats emerging from a tube. The naked mole rat is unable to feel pain from hot chili peppers, and other stimuli that would hurt most other animals. Credit: Laura-Nadine Schuhmacher

The African naked mole rat is an odd, homely creature with the closest thing to real-life super powers on earth. These small rodents can live for 32 years, they are cancer-resistant, and they are impervious to some types of pain.

Now, new research has pinpointed the evolutionary change that made the naked mole rat so uniquely pain-free, according to a study published on October 11th in Cell Reports.

"We think evolution has selected for this tweak just subtly enough so that the pain signaling becomes non-functional, but not strong enough that it becomes a danger for the animal," says lead author Gary R. Lewin, a professor at the Max-Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine in Berlin, Germany.

Imagine the sting of entering a hot tub with a bad sunburn. The naked mole rat wouldn't be bothered, but most animals would sense this as thermal hyperalgesia, and the scientists who conducted the study have a good idea of what goes on at a cellular level when this happens.

In response to high temperatures and inflammation around sensory neurons, nerve growth factor (NGF) molecules bind to a receptor called TrkA. This kicks off a cascade of chemical signals that "sensitize" an ion channel - called TRPV1 - on the surface of the sensory neuron so that it opens. Once TRPV1 opens, it results in sensory nerve firing that tells the brain to register pain at temperatures that are not normally painful.

Naked mole rats emerging from a tube. The naked mole rat is unable to feel pain from hot chili peppers, and other stimuli that would hurt most other animals. Credit: Thomas Park, PhD University of Illinois at Chicago

Through more than a dozen carefully designed experiments, Lewin and colleagues found what differentiates the naked mole rat from other animals in this process - a small change in their TrkA receptor.

For example, if the scientists swapped out the TRPV1 channels in a mouse cell for naked mole rat versions of TRPV1, then thermal hyperalgesia occurred normally. But if a cell had a common rat TRPV1 and a naked mole rat TrkA, then the cell couldn't sense thermal hyperalgesia.

Researchers compared the gene for the naked mole rat's TrkA receptor to those of 26 other mammals, and five other African mole rat species. They discovered a switch of just one to three amino acid changes on one section of the naked mole rat TrkA receptor that make it less sensitive.

"Even though the naked mole rat's version of the TrkA receptor is almost identical to that of a mouse or a rat, it has a very significant effect on the animal's ability to feel pain," says Lewin.

Further experiments revealed that the tweak on the naked mole rat's TrkA receptor didn't render it dysfunctional, but hypo-functional. Their TrkA receptor could respond like that of other animals, if the naked mole rat cell was exposed to ten times the normal concentration of NGF.

A naked mole rat climbing over chili peppers. The naked mole rat is unable to feel pain from hot chili peppers, and other stimuli that would hurt most other animals. Credit: Thomas Park, PhD University of Illinois at Chicago

This subtle difference between a hypo-functional and a dysfunctional TrkA receptor may explain why the naked mole rat could survive without the typical neurodegeneration found in animals with mutations that completely shut down NGF signaling. Previous research has shown developing embryos require NGF signaling to develop a normal pain signaling systems.

However, the new study found that naked mole rats are born with roughly the same number of pain sensors as newborn mice. It's only by adulthood that the naked mole rat's pain sensors dwindle by two-thirds compared to any other mammal. Evolution may have selected a TrkA receptor that works well enough for the animal developing as an embryo, but leaves adults with fewer nerve receptors and partially pain-free.

Losing thermal hyperalgesia might help the naked mole rats survive in their crowded underground colonies, where the close contact can be uncomfortably hot but thermal hyperalgesia may not be helpful in this warm environment. And it's possible that losing sensory neurons as adults may help the animals conserve energy.

"They live in desert regions underground, and they have to do a lot of work to get their food," says Lewin. "They have the lowest metabolic rate of any mammal. Evolution has shut down everything that is not absolutely necessary - including extra nerve receptors."

Lewin and his colleagues are planning future studies in mice bred to have the unique naked mole rat TrkA receptor.

"We hope to see that these modified mice will show lots of features that make naked mole rats unique," says Lewin.

Explore further: Naked mole-rats may hold clues to pain relief

More information: Cell Reports, Lewin et al.: "Hypofunctional TrkA accounts for the absence of pain sensitization in the African naked mole-rat." www.cell.com/cell-reports/full … 2211-1247(16)31274-8 , DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.035

Related Stories

Naked mole-rats may hold clues to pain relief

September 22, 2012

Naked mole-rats evolved to thrive in an acidic environment that other mammals, including humans, would find intolerable. Researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago report new findings as to how these rodents have ...

Naked mole-rats bear chili pepper heat

January 29, 2008

Pity the tiny naked mole-rat. The buck-toothed, sausage-like rodent lives by the hundreds in packed, oxygen-starved burrows some six feet under ground. It is even cold-blooded -- which, as far as we know, is unique among ...

Naked mole-rats' anti-cancer gene is unique among mammals

May 6, 2015

Naked mole rats are unusual in many ways as a result of adaptations to living underground, with extreme longevity and a lack of the normal signs of ageing. Their resistance to cancer has been linked to the production of a ...

Recommended for you

A new, dynamic view of chromatin movements

January 18, 2018

In cells, proteins tightly package the long thread of DNA into pearl necklace-like complexes known as chromatin. Scientists at EPFL show for the first time how chromatin moves, answering longstanding questions about how its ...

How living systems compute solutions to problems

January 17, 2018

How do decisions get made in the natural world? One possibility is that the individuals or components in biological systems collectively compute solutions to challenges they face in their environments. Consider that fish ...

Scale-eating fish adopt clever parasitic methods to survive

January 17, 2018

Think of them as extra-large parasites. A small group of fishes—possibly the world's cleverest carnivorous grazers—feeds on the scales of other fish in the tropics. The different species' approach differs: some ram their ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

FredJose
1 / 5 (2) Oct 11, 2016
Evolution may have selected a TrkA receptor that works well enough for the animal developing as an embryo, but leaves adults with fewer nerve receptors and partially pain-free.

Notice how this speculation is pure non-science and completely dismiss-able in the context of this article. It contributes absolutely NOTHING to the scientific discovery made here. It is completely and utterly religious in its make up - the bow to the god of the materialistic humanist.
slash
not rated yet Oct 12, 2016
Evolution may have selected a TrkA receptor that works well enough for the animal developing as an embryo, but leaves adults with fewer nerve receptors and partially pain-free.

Notice how this speculation is pure non-science and completely dismiss-able in the context of this article. It contributes absolutely NOTHING to the scientific discovery made here. It is completely and utterly religious in its make up - the bow to the god of the materialistic humanist.

Notice how this comment is pure nonsense and completely dismissable in the context of science.

@FJ: what you cherry-picked is a hypothesis - a plausible explanation for the observations being made. As long as you cannot disprove it, there's nothing unscientific about it other than your total lack of understanding of the scientific method.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.