New study shows how the US can avoid a debt disaster

October 31, 2016 by Joanna Carver, University of Texas at San Antonio
Credit: University of Texas at San Antonio

A new study by John Merrifield, professor of economics at The University of Texas at San Antonio, describes a way for the United States to curb its spending and stop the growth of the astronomical national debt, which is now close to $20 trillion. According to Merrifield, the country could be headed for disaster if it doesn't start taking its spending problem seriously.

"We need to find a way to have less debt that's politically feasible," Merrifield said. "That's obvious. But how do you make it politically palatable to somehow restrain spending?"

Cutting spending is unpopular on both sides of the aisle for a number of reasons, but the most common excuse is that the government needs to be able to spend without limits in the case of a disaster. To eliminate that excuse, Merrifield and his co-author, Barry W. Poulson, retired professor of economics at the University of Colorado, have adapted Swiss and Swedish spending policies. One of these adaptations includes an emergency fund to cover the recovery costs of a natural disaster or terrorist attack.

"Things happen and we can't foretell reasons to spend, so we need to eliminate the political cover of people who want to keep spending," Merrifield said.

The next step is a cap on spending, which is more difficult to make happen.

"The inherent bias in government is to take a few dollars from a lot of people and focus those dollars on a smaller number of people in order to obtain their votes," he said. "This tempts politicians to spend more and more money."

Essentially, a politician maintains their home support by showing themselves as effective representatives who bring home the bacon for their districts. Cutting spending is unpopular because when a program gets cut, constituents are more likely to feel that pinch rather than notice any small savings come tax season. However, Merrifield insists this is necessary to get the under control.

"We've gotten ourselves into a pretty bad fix," he said. "If we had adopted these measures in 1994, today our national debt would be half of what it is now."

However, if Merrifield and Poulson's measures were adopted tomorrow, the debt would only be reduced by about 10% in 10 years, as a result of 20 years of reckless spending.

"Even if we restrict our rate of growth of , it's going to be a lot harder to move forward," Merrifield said. "The longer we wait to do something, the harder it's going to be to make much progress."

He and Poulson are set to meet with representatives from lawmakers and think tanks in Washington, D.C. in mid-November to discuss their findings and possible solutions to the problem.

"It's caught some people's attention," Merrifield said. "Now, the hard part is getting people to vote for it."

Explore further: Mental disorders were most costly in U.S. in 2013

Related Stories

Mental disorders were most costly in U.S. in 2013

May 26, 2016

(HealthDay)—Mental disorders were the most costly conditions in the United States in 2013, with a cost of $201 billion, according to a study published in the May issue of Health Affairs.

Spending on compounded drugs skyrocketing

August 3, 2016

(HealthDay)—Government spending on compounded drugs has skyrocketed, raising concerns of fraud and overbilling, according to a report published by Kaiser Health News.

United states ranks 20th in holiday spending

December 23, 2011

Americans typically spend $70 billion more in December than in the average of November and January (the months around December). In a recent National Science Foundation-sponsored interview, Joel Waldfogel, the Carlson School's ...

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ursiny33
5 / 5 (2) Oct 31, 2016
multi trillion dollar tax cuts and miltary intervention, regime change and national security apparatus and Pentagon spending has created the added 15 trillion in debt this century thats the facts without paying for it. with dedicated taxes

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.