Uber tests in Pittsburgh don't mean driverless taxis are imminent, transportation policy expert says

Uber tests in Pittsburgh don't mean driverless taxis are imminent, transportation policy expert says
Credit: University of Kansas

The media hype surrounding Uber conducting tests of driverless ride-share vehicles in Pittsburgh made it seem like the future arrived sooner than most people expected.

But a University of Kansas researcher of transportation policy says the tests are far from what most people visualize with driverless vehicles. For one, according to media reports, typically two Uber employees sat in the front seat of the car during the trips.

"Vehicle automation technology is developing fast, but as it develops, new issues with technology deployment and integration with the existing also arise," said Bradley Lane, assistant professor in the School of Public Affairs and Administration.

Lane's research focuses on travel behavior, policy and planning issues in urban transportation. He has authored or co-authored studies on government promotion of electric vehicles, how gasoline prices influence public transit and purchasing trends of among other topics.

Q: Are you surprised that Uber is testing these vehicles so soon basically before any laws have been written?

Lane: Yes, and no. I think much of the news coverage oversells a little how soon it is happening. This is still just a demonstration project with human backup drivers on board. The cars still can't handle normal traffic flow above speed limits, or make right turns on red, or the quirks of local driving laws and conventions, such as the example of left turns at signals identified in Pittsburgh.

We're still a long way from seeing any kind of market penetration of a vehicle that looks like any other vehicle that you can get in, push a button, then sit back and open a beer and watch movies while it drives you from Lawrence to Wichita – which is what I think much of public imagines when they think of .

Q: What will be the key things to watch going forward?

Lane: Insurance and liability issues remain largely unaddressed, as does how citations and traffic violations will be dealt with. Two other things that immediately jump out at me are the consumer acceptability of this vehicle technology and the operation of the vehicle without some kind of backup. With consumers, I wonder how freely how many will give up the control of driving. Will the autonomous cars be full-time, or can you switch it on and off? Do I have to buy a new car, or is this apparatus something I can just attach to a car I already have? And how acceptable is the autonomous apparatus, which in the pictures in the article was a pretty large and clumsy-looking attachment to the roof?

With the backup, notice that the Uber deployment had a backup driver that could take over when the automated driving system got stuck. How will the final form of interface with the driver? Will the driver be able to take control of the vehicle in certain situations? How will the driver know to? What happens if the driver doesn't take control? What if the driver wants to take control and the vehicle won't disengage the automated driving system? Will this interface be consistent across vehicle models and makes? There just remain so many unaddressed questions and components of the deployment and user interface with this technology.


Explore further

Agency says driverless cars will need OK once Uber charges

Citation: Uber tests in Pittsburgh don't mean driverless taxis are imminent, transportation policy expert says (2016, September 29) retrieved 14 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-09-uber-pittsburgh-dont-driverless-taxis.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
6 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more