Quantum mechanics technique allows for pushing past 'Rayleigh's curse'

September 5, 2016 by Bob Yirka report
The Rayleigh criterion states that in direct imaging, two light sources are only discernable when the centers of their diffraction patterns, or peaks of their point spread functions, are farther apart than their widths. (Top) The sources are farther apart than the Rayleigh criterion distance. (Middle) The sources meet the Rayleigh criterion distance. (Bottom) The sources are closer than the Rayleigh criterion distance. Tsang and collaborators used quantum metrology techniques to show that the Rayleigh criterion is not a fundamental limitation, finding that the separation between two objects can always be estimated with a precision that is independent of the size of the separation. Credit: Wikimedia Commons/Spencer Blevin, via Physics

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with the National University of Singapore has found a way to get around what they describe as 'Rayleigh's curse'—a phenomenon that happens when two light sources appear to coalesce as they grow closer together, limiting the ability to measure the distance between them. In their paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters, the team describes how they applied a quantum mechanics technique to solve the problem.

For many years, scientists working in a variety of fields studying the stars through a telescope or objects through a microscope have been limited by the same problem—diffraction interfering with light sources that are very close together—the wave-like nature of light causes spreading, which in turn can cause an overlap of photons striking a surface meant to be used to measure the difference between two sources. Back in the late 1800's, John William Strutt, Lord Rayleigh, laid down the criterion to describe such limitations and it now bears his name. In this new effort, the researchers report on a new they have developed that gets around this problem, allowing for measuring the distance between light sources regardless of how far apart they are.

To address the diffraction problem, the researchers applied metrology and quantum optics techniques, using a hybrid of quantum mechanics and a type of statistical theory—it involves working out which measurements are likely to give the most information when measuring sources of light—even when they violate the Rayleigh criterion. The result is an estimation, but one that is believed to be extremely accurate. In so doing, they have shown that 'Rayleigh's curse' is not an actual limit, but one that can be overcome. The work by the team follows an earlier effort using another technique and is different from other techniques that also overcome the Rayleigh limit that other teams have been reporting.

The researchers report that their technique is practical—devices using it will allow scientists to measure the distance between very close stars or very tiny objects that until now have not been discernable. One such area of research, they note, is fluorescence microscopy, which they believe should be a particularly good starting point.

Explore further: New technique for isolating sunny-day 'light' scattering could help illuminate Universe's birth

More information: Mankei Tsang et al. Quantum Theory of Superresolution for Two Incoherent Optical Point Sources, Physical Review X (2016). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.031033 , On Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00552

Rayleigh's criterion for resolving two incoherent point sources has been the most influential measure of optical imaging resolution for over a century. In the context of statistical image processing, violation of the criterion is especially detrimental to the estimation of the separation between the sources, and modern far-field superresolution techniques rely on suppressing the emission of close sources to enhance the localization precision. Using quantum optics, quantum metrology, and statistical analysis, here we show that, even if two close incoherent sources emit simultaneously, measurements with linear optics and photon counting can estimate their separation from the far field almost as precisely as conventional methods do for isolated sources, rendering Rayleigh's criterion irrelevant to the problem. Our results demonstrate that superresolution can be achieved not only for fluorophores but also for stars.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Two teams independently test Tomonaga–Luttinger theory

October 20, 2017

(Phys.org)—Two teams of researchers working independently of one another have found ways to test aspects of the Tomonaga–Luttinger theory that describes interacting quantum particles in 1-D ensembles in a Tomonaga–Luttinger ...

Using optical chaos to control the momentum of light

October 19, 2017

Integrated photonic circuits, which rely on light rather than electrons to move information, promise to revolutionize communications, sensing and data processing. But controlling and moving light poses serious challenges. ...

Black butterfly wings offer a model for better solar cells

October 19, 2017

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with California Institute of Technology and the Karlsruh Institute of Technology has improved the efficiency of thin film solar cells by mimicking the architecture of rose butterfly wings. ...

Terahertz spectroscopy goes nano

October 19, 2017

Brown University researchers have demonstrated a way to bring a powerful form of spectroscopy—a technique used to study a wide variety of materials—into the nano-world.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Thorium Boy
5 / 5 (1) Sep 06, 2016
Article told us basically nothing.
not rated yet Sep 06, 2016
Like what it actually means for science or technology
not rated yet Sep 06, 2016
When you look at a point source of light, quantum effects mean it doesn't behave like a 'point' but rather a diffuse blob with concentric rings of greater or less intensity. When you have two blobs close together, you can't classically distingush which blob is which. This paper proposes a method based on quantum mechanics that could theoretically separate the two.

This is important because things like microscopy are often limited by 'diffraction limits' like the size of the blob. Being able to resolve smaller distances would allow microscopes to see even smaller details than previously possible.

My guess is that the specific details of how the process works are quite detailed maths that aren't particularly relevant to anyone outside the field.
5 / 5 (2) Sep 06, 2016
Article told us basically nothing.

You could have just used 0.0001 Joule and moved your lazy-ass finger to click the link to the actual paper instead of griping. If you were really interested in the science instead of posting BS you would have done so.

Just a thought.

Think. Think again. Try to see if you can find a solution to your problem. And if you really can't then ask someone to explain it to you. Just going "this isn't explaining it to me in easy enough terms" is just lazy.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.