Why do consumers participate in 'green' programs?

Why do consumers participate in 'green' programs?
Tomas Hult, director of MSU's International Business Center Credit: G.L. Kohuth, Michigan State University

From recycling to reusing hotel towels, consumers who participate in a company's "green" program are more satisfied with its service, finds a new study co-led by a Michigan State University researcher.

Doing good makes customers feel good, and that "warm glow" shapes opinion, said Tomas Hult, Byington Endowed Chair and professor of marketing in the Eli Broad College of Business. But it gets more complicated when companies throw incentives into the mix.

"Companies are increasingly adopting sustainability initiatives and ultimately these 'green' programs are intended to be good for the environment and also increase customers' satisfaction," said Hult, who is director of MSU's International Business Center. "Our research helps strike the right balance between incentivizing customers to participate in green programs and focusing on the bottom-line performance of the company."

Hult and researchers from Cornell University and Florida State University conducted four studies in three service settings: restaurants, hotels and online retailing. They found the types of rewards offered by companies to participate in sustainability programs could affect satisfaction.

The researchers tested two types of incentives: those that benefit solely the consumer (i.e. loyalty points) and those that benefit another organization (i.e. charitable donations).

For green program participants, rewards that benefit another organization created the highest rate of satisfaction about the business.

And for those who chose not to participate in a green program, self-benefiting rewards cast doubt about the motive of a program. That scenario offers nonparticipants an opportunity to rationalize their decision to not participate, and lack of guilt translates into feelings of satisfaction about the business, Hult said.

People will interpret incentives in whatever way best suits their egos, he said. So for both groups to be happiest, a company should allow customers to choose between a reward that benefits themselves or another organization.

Many managers, particularly in the hospitality industry, are reluctant to introduce sustainability initiatives that might negatively influence the guest experience, Hult said. But this research, one of the first of its kind, provides managers with guidance on how to best design such programs as well as best practices for "green marketing."

Explore further

Global expansion all about give and take, study finds

More information: Michael Giebelhausen et al, Adjusting the Warm-Glow Thermostat: How Incentivizing Participation in Voluntary Green Programs Moderates Their Impact on Service Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing (2016). DOI: 10.1509/jm.14.0497
Journal information: Journal of Marketing

Citation: Why do consumers participate in 'green' programs? (2016, July 22) retrieved 22 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-07-consumers-green.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 02, 2016
You're right: It is simple math. The problem is that there are no simple solutions.

We used to talk a lot about the "population bomb" back in the 60's and 70's, when the world population was just half of what it is today. Paul Erlich wrote the best-selling "Population Bomb" in 1968.

The middle class in the US and EU actually have closely approached "zero population growth" for a couple of generations.

The population problem is mostly happening in the 3rd World, where billions have little joy in their lives besides screwing and infant mortality is so high that the cultures trend toward very large families to ensure that at least a couple survive.

China dealt with its population problem with a draconian "one child per couple" program that actually worked. But, this is so politically incorrect that it will never happen elsewhere.

In the end the only solution is Malthus'. But, the dying are not going to go away quietly. The resource wars are just getting started.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more