Physicists measured something new in the radioactive decay of neutrons

June 14, 2016, National Institute of Standards and Technology
When a free neutron (green) undergoes a process known as beta decay, it produces a proton (red), an antineutrino (gold) and an electron (blue), as well as a photon (white). An experiment at NIST measured the range of energies that a given photon produced by beta decay can possess, a range known as its energy spectrum. Credit: N. Hanacek / NIST

A physics experiment performed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has enhanced scientists' understanding of how free neutrons decay into other particles. The work provides the first measurement of the energy spectrum of photons, or particles of light, that are released in the otherwise extensively measured process known as neutron beta decay. The details of this decay process are important because, for example, they help to explain the observed amounts of hydrogen and other light atoms created just after the Big Bang.

Published in Physical Review Letters, the findings confirm physicists' big-picture understanding of the way particles and forces work together in the universe—an understanding known as the Standard Model. The work has stimulated new theoretical activity in quantum electrodynamics (QED), the modern theory of how matter interacts with light. The team's approach could also help search for new physics that lies beyond the Standard Model.

Neutrons are well known as one of the three kinds of particles that form atoms. Present in all atoms except the most common form of hydrogen, together with protons form the atomic nucleus. However, "free" neutrons not bound within a nucleus decay in about 15 minutes on average. Most frequently, a neutron transforms through the process into a proton, an electron, a photon, and the antimatter version of the neutrino, an abundant but elusive particle that rarely interacts with matter.

The photons from beta decay are what the research team wanted to explore. These photons have a range of possible energies predicted by QED, which has worked very well as a theory for decades. But no one had actually checked this aspect of QED with high precision.

"We weren't expecting to see anything unusual," said NIST physicist Jeff Nico, "but we wanted to test QED's predictions very precisely in a way no one has done before."

Nico and his colleagues, who represent nine research institutions, performed their measurements at the NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR). It produces an intense beam of slow-moving neutrons whose photon emissions can be detected with the same setup used for earlier precision measurements of the neutron's lifetime.

The team measured two aspects of neutron decay: the energy spectrum of the photons, and also its branching ratio, which can provide information on how frequently the decays were accompanied by photons above a specific energy. The results of this effort gave them a branching ratio measurement more than twice as accurate as the previous value, and the first measurement of the energy spectrum.

"Everything we found was consistent with the predominant QED calculations," Nico said. "We got quite a good match with theory on the , and we reduced the uncertainty in the branching ratio."

According to Nico, the results provided specific information that theoretical physicists are already using to further develop QED to provide more detailed descriptions of neutron beta decay.

The results serve as a needed check on the Standard Model, said Nico, and validates the team's experimental approach as a way to go beyond it. With better detectors, the approach could be used to search for so-called "right-handed" neutrinos, which have not yet been detected in nature, and potential time-reversal symmetry violations, which could explain why there is much more matter than antimatter in the universe.

Explore further: New experiments challenge fundamental understanding of electromagnetism

More information: M.J. Bales, R. Alarcon, C.D. Bass, E.J. Beise, H. Breuer, J. Byrne, T.E. Chupp, K.J. Coakley, R.L. Cooper, M.S. Dewey, S. Gardner, T.R. Gentile, D. He, H.P. Mumm, J.S. Nico, B. O'Neill, A.K. Thompson and F.E. Wietfeldt (RDK II Collaboration). Precision measurement of the radiative beta decay of the free neutron. Physical Review Letters. June 14, 2016, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.242501

Related Stories

Calcium isotope holds the secret to the mass of neutrinos

April 12, 2016

Scientists around the world are being kept in suspense by the negligible mass of neutrinos, subatomic particles that could be matter and antimatter at the same time. Now, researchers from the University of Tokyo, in collaboration ...

Recommended for you

Quantum sensing method measures minuscule magnetic fields

March 15, 2019

A new way of measuring atomic-scale magnetic fields with great precision, not only up and down but sideways as well, has been developed by researchers at MIT. The new tool could be useful in applications as diverse as mapping ...

Researchers report new light-activated micro pump

March 11, 2019

Even the smallest mechanical pumps have limitations, from the complex microfabrication techniques required to make them to the fact that there are limits on how small they can be. Researchers have announced a potential solution—a ...

Investigating the motility of swimming Euglena

March 8, 2019

Some species of Euglenids, a diversified family of aquatic unicellular organisms, can perform large-amplitude, elegantly coordinated body deformations. Although this behavior has been known for centuries, its function is ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dan42day
3.8 / 5 (9) Jun 14, 2016
I love how they twist

"consistent with the predominant QED calculations"

and

"We got quite a good match with theory"

into a headline of

"Physicists measured something new in the radioactive decay of neutrons".

The Enquirer would be proud.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (2) Jun 14, 2016
What? BS!
Da Schneib
4.3 / 5 (6) Jun 14, 2016
A nice confirmation of QED with a hint toward how to look for some physics beyond the SM. Not a very sexy experiment, but good solid confirmation of theory.
Nik_2213
5 / 5 (3) Jun 15, 2016
It's nice work, it's well-tightened prior error-bars, but how did it earn that daft 'NEW' headline ?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.