Although physicists have been investigating different quantum speed limits for different types of quantum systems, it has not been clear what the best way to do this is, or how many different quantum speed limits there are.

Now in a new paper published in *Physical Review X*, Diego Paiva Pires *et al.*, from the UK and Brazil, have used techniques from information geometry to show that there are an infinite number of quantum speed limits. They also develop a way to determine which of these speed limits are the strictest, or in other words, which speed limits offer the tightest lower bounds. As the researchers explain, the search for the ultimate quantum speed limits is closely related to the very nature of time itself.

"In recent years, there has been an intense theoretical and experimental research activity to understand, on one hand, a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics such as time, and to devise, on the other hand, efficient schemes for the implementation of quantum technologies," coauthor Gerardo Adesso, at the University of Nottingham, told *Phys.org*. "A basic question that combines and underpins both areas of research is: 'How fast can a quantum system evolve in time?' Establishing general and tight quantum speed limits is crucial to assess how fast quantum technologies can ultimately be, and can accordingly guide in the design of more efficient protocols operating at or close to the ultimate bounds."

In order to determine how fast a quantum system can evolve from one state to another, it's necessary to be able to distinguish between the two states, and there are multiple ways to do this. In the new study, the physicists used a general method based on information geometry. From a geometric perspective, two distinguishable states can be represented by two points on the surface of some shape, such as a sphere or other manifold. Previous research has shown that there are an infinite number of corresponding metrics that can be used to measure the distinguishability of two quantum states.

In the new study, the physicists have shown that each of these metrics corresponds to a different quantum speed limit. The "strictest" quantum speed limit is determined by the metric that gives the shortest distance (also known as a 'geodesic') between the two points, or states, as measured along the manifold's curved surface.

"A different quantum speed limit arises from each of these metrics in such a way that the tightest bound for a given dynamics is specified by the metric whose geodesic is best tailored to the given dynamical path," explained coauthor Marco Cianciaruso, also at Nottingham.

Overall, the new approach unifies most of the previous results by interpreting them under a single, new framework. On one hand, the researchers could derive the tightest bounds to date on quantum speed limits for some relevant instances, such as quantum bits undergoing dissipative and decohering evolutions. On the other hand, they could also show that bounds that have been previously proposed for other instances are truly the optimal bounds—no tighter bounds will ever be found.

In the future, the researchers plan to experimentally investigate the quantum speed limits derived here using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques.

"Our findings are expected to have an impact on the fields of quantum information, computation, simulation, and metrology," said Diogo Soares-Pinto at the Sao Carlos Institute of Physics, who supervised the project.

**Explore further:**
Physicists quantify the usefulness of 'quantum weirdness'

**More information:**
Diego Paiva Pires *et al.* "Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Limits." *Physical Review X*. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021031

## BrettC

## Whydening Gyre

## Hyperfuzzy

## Steelwolf

This paper admits the possibility of, at the intensely tiny time that it takes, there may be a decoherence of that electron, into another state, whereby it travels and reassembles in a higher orbital state. Now, if one considers that groups and bands of stars are going to want to find the right speed for the obits of their particles, it is possible that part of the 'electron' be stars novaeing to the point that the gas and stellar cores of the globular cluster moves to a higher energy orbital.

Fascinating

## Hyperfuzzy

## torbjorn_b_g_larsson

The image illustration is also poorly described since the alleged geodesic is not the shortest path as it should be. Indeed, while the paper is dense theoretic, it has a clear image caption where the geodesic is in red with a generic quantum state evolution in blue. The trick is to get the blue path to coincide with a geodesic.

And that is as far as I will dig into the paper.

@ogg: Relativistic deformation is not the invariant size. But yes, the Planck size is not the size of a geometry.

@Steelworlf, Hyperfuzzy: An electron transfers to another orbit described by its distribution. If it tunnels that part is instantaneous, the rest time is by EM theory of the photon et cetera.

## ski137

## beshir75

## Nik_2213