Going electric adds up to a good idea for NYC buses

Going electric adds up to a good idea for NYC buses
An electric bus during a trial run in New York City. While the purchase price is higher than for diesel or natural gas-powered buses, electric buses offer both environmental and health benefits and can save money in the long run, according to a new analysis.

New York City Transit is considering adding electric buses to its fleet. The purchase price of electric buses is higher than for diesel buses-, but using them would reduce harmful emissions. So is this a good idea?

New York City Transit and MTA Bus have a combined fleet of about 5,700 buses, with annual ridership of around 800 million rides per year. The current fleet of buses includes diesel, hybrid diesel, and CNG (compressed natural gas) buses.

As part of OneNYC, Mayor Bill de Blasio has set an aggressive objective to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change to 80 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. That may seem like a long way off, but cutting greenhouse gases by 80 percent in the face of growing demand and a growing population is a challenging task. The city has a limited number of tools at its disposal, and the primary focus is on reducing emissions associated with buildings. However, the city does not control public transportation and the associated emissions. Those emissions should be addressed as well.

The MTA owns the bus and subway systems in New York City. Public transportation is more efficient than individual car ownership: By riding the buses and subways, New York City residents and visitors are helping to reduce the city's emissions. The MTA has made many investments that have resulted in improved service, resulting in growth in ridership. For example, subway ridership reached a 65-year high in 2014, and that was exceeded in 2015. The MTA has also been making investments in various sustainability projects. The result of the investments and the increased ridership is an overall reduction in greenhouse gases by the MTA and for the city.

Greenhouse gases and electric buses

Changing the entire fleet to all electric buses would result in a net reduction of within the city limits of over 500,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalent, assuming the current mix of power generation in New York City and Westchester County. That's enough CO2e to make a fractional impact on the country's 2025 GHG commitments made in Paris.

Going electric adds up to a good idea for NYC buses
Comparison of greenhous gas emissions for electric buses vs. the current fleet of buses used by New York City.

hese results are consistent with those published by the Electric Power Research Institute in conjunction with the NRDC. Variations are possible based on bus manufacturer, bus routes, number of passengers and seasonal impacts to battery life, but the overall and net results will not change appreciably.

What about the cost?

The cost of a diesel bus can range from roughly $450,000 to $750,000 depending on the characteristics of the bus. While the cost differential varies, this analysis assumes that electric buses cost on average $300,000 more. Looking at differences in bus cost and in operating costs over the 12-year life of a bus, the $39,000 annual savings associated with fuel cost (diesel or CNG vs. electricity) and bus maintenance cost more than offsets the higher cost of electric buses. And that does not include potential cost benefits.

The up-front additional investment in the provides a positive NPV (net present value), but there is a long payback period (over 7 years) excluding health care cost benefits.

Health benefits

The use of electric buses would reduce the particulate emissions from diesel-fueled buses and offer an extra benefit in reducing health care costs associated with heart and lung diseases. The savings would come from reduced hospital costs and less time missed at work.

Going electric adds up to a good idea for NYC buses
Lifetime cost of electric buses vs. diesel buses in U.S.$ excluding cost savings associated with health benefits.

The projected annual cost benefit to New York City from making the switch to electric is approximately $150,000 per bus per year, based on the Environmental Protection Agency's Diesel Emissions Quantifier tool. This translates to roughly $100 per New York City resident of health care savings per year, if the entire fleet is converted to all-electric. With the addition of the health benefits to the analysis, the net present value improves to $1.1M, with a healthy payback of about 2 years.

Experience in other cities

Many other cities around the world have begun exploring the implementation of electric buses. The Antelope Valley Transit Authority in northern Los Angeles is planning to convert its entire fleet of 85 buses to all-electric, the first transit authority in the country to convert completely. Currently, they are seeing a savings of $46,000 per bus per year from operations.

Vienna wants to be a leader in the green movement and has decided to eliminate in its historic central district as a first step. They have replaced all 12 buses on the inner city route to electric buses.

London has purchased several electric double-decker buses. These buses use slow charging technology, which has been installed in the bus parking facility, where charging takes about four hours and occurs overnight. According to Transport for London, the double-decker buses augment an electric fleet of 22 single-deck buses. So there is quite a bit of experience building in many cities, and it would make sense for New York City to consider its options.

So what's the drawback?

Going electric adds up to a good idea for NYC buses
Lifetime cost of electric buses vs. diesel buses in U.S.$ including cost savings associated with health benefits.

Why hasn't New York City made the switch already? There are several reasons to proceed cautiously. First, the electric bus does have a higher initial purchase price. This impacts the MTA's capital budget, which is distinct from the operating budget. The issue can be worked out, but it's more complex than it seems.

Second, electric buses have not been around for long. Given that the lifetime of a bus is about 12 years, and that batteries can degrade over time with constant charging and discharging, the lifetime performance of electric bus batteries is uncertain. So the city would be prudent to proceed cautiously.

New York City should take the first steps towards purchasing electric buses, and in fact they have. The financial case closes sufficiently, and the health benefits and greenhouse gas reductions are both compelling. The city ran a two-month pilot back in 2013, but they should consider running pilots with at least two vendors for at least a year each to gain a more in-depth understanding of electric bus operations as well as the impacts of seasonality, specifically on battery operation. Investigation of different bus manufacturers should also include learning from the experience of other cities.

The decision to make the transition to electric buses should include input from various constituents, an in-depth understanding of political considerations, and an understanding of sources of financing. Adoption of these recommendations should also include a detailed operational analysis to maintain the high-quality level of service currently provided by the city. By taking these steps, the city will continue to demonstrate transit leadership both in the United States as well as around the globe.

Explore further

New NYC buses have Wi-Fi but no tech to avoid those on foot

Provided by Earth Institute, Columbia University

This story is republished courtesy of Earth Institute, Columbia University: blogs.ei.columbia.edu/ .

Citation: Going electric adds up to a good idea for NYC buses (2016, June 1) retrieved 20 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-06-electric-good-idea-nyc-buses.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 01, 2016
The difference in noise and pollutants (and performance) of electrics over the Old Ways and ICE will l have us wondering why we did not do it earlier.

Jun 01, 2016
The difference in noise and pollutants (and performance) of electrics over the Old Ways and ICE will l have us wondering why we did not do it earlier.

It's very simple. The only practically usable technology in terms of price and availability for electric busses all the way up to late 90's was lead acid batteries, and those have a replacement rate of 14 months in daily use as per studies from postal vans.

NIckel batteries in large sizes were only practical in wet cell designs, but those presented a hazard of hydrogen evolution during heavy discharge, and there are couple cases of electric Citroens burning up because of it, and they were exceedingly expensive.

the lifetime performance of electric bus batteries is uncertain

It's not exactly uncertain. Lithium batteries have well defined cycle performance. Cheap and dense batteries go for less cycles 600-700, and expensive heavier batteries go for 2-3000 cycles. The busses will exhaust the cells in 3-8 years

Jun 01, 2016
The cars that burned were these guys: https://en.wikipe...ectrique
It's running on Saft made wet cell NiCad batteries, first made around 1995-6.

GM didn't buy worldwide patents for large format nickel batteries like the electric car conspiracy theories claim. Other countries could freely make and use them, and they tried but found out they just weren't good enough for the purpose. Especially the cold weather performance and cycle efficiency was poor and self-discharge was too high to be practical for general use.

Still, the Berlingo Electrique van has seen some popularity, especially because the French state bought tens of thousands of them for the post office.

Jun 06, 2016
Toronto used to have a large fleet of electric trolley busses not too long ago. No batteries, powered by twin runners on overhead wires.

Trollybusses have been around for a fair bit of time. Saw a system in St. Petersburg (Russia) that's been in operation since the mid 1930's
Seems to me it would make a lot of sense to use all-electric busses with very small battery packs, and put short stretches of overhead recharge wires overhead at each end-line turnabout station.

There's already concepts for this e.g. here:
or here:

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more