On common ground: Liverpool and Palmyra, World Heritage in danger

June 7, 2016, University of Kent

As the world anxiously awaits a report from restoration experts on the condition of the ancient Syrian City of Palmyra, now recaptured from ISIS control, a University of Kent heritage lawyer warns that, much closer to home, the Maritime Mercantile City of Liverpool is also on UNESCO's List of World Heritage in Danger.

In a paper titled From Local to World Heritage: a Comparative analysis, Dr Sophie Vigneron, of Kent Law School (KLS), explains that following Liverpool City Council's outline planning consent for a £5.5 billion urban development known as Liverpool Waters, the Maritime Mercantile City could even be removed from the World Heritage List altogether.

Liverpool was made a World Heritage site in 2004 to celebrate its legacy as a merchant shipping port. The home of The Beatles and many other important cultural influences was identified as 'one of the world's major trading centres in the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries' and subsequently approved as having Outstanding Universal Value in 2010. However, with the proposal for Liverpool Waters, a hotel, office and residential development, the World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) mission concluded that the World Heritage Site would be irreversibly damaged due to 'substantial deterioration of its architectural and town planning coherence, a serious loss of historical authenticity and an important loss of cultural significance'.

Research on the identification of national properties for inclusion in the World Heritage List in relation to the criteria of outstanding universal value, authenticity and integrity and the nomination of properties, is examined in Dr Vigneron's research which highlights these key findings:

  • Balancing conservation versus economic development is an ongoing issue
  • Goal of more consultation and community involvement rarely achieved
  • National selection not representative
  • Specialist criteria not translating into lay concepts

Explore further: No logging at protected Tasmanian forest: Australia

More information: Robert Pickard et al, Editorial, The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice (2016). DOI: 10.1080/17567505.2016.1172777

Related Stories

No logging at protected Tasmanian forest: Australia

March 20, 2016

Australian authorities Sunday said there would be no logging in the World Heritage-listed Tasmanian Wilderness, following recommendations in a report submitted to the United Nations's cultural body UNESCO.

Japan's Mount Fuji to get World Heritage stamp

May 1, 2013

Japan's Mount Fuji will likely be added to the list of UNESCO World Heritage sites next month after an influential advisory panel to the UN cultural body made a recommendation, officials said.

UNESCO warns Syrian heritage sites endangered

June 20, 2013

UNESCO on Thursday added six ancient sites in Syria including a fortress of Saladin and a Crusader castle to the endangered World Heritage list, warning that more than two years of civil war had inflicted heavy damage.

Should we 3D print a new Palmyra?

March 31, 2016

The destruction at the ancient city of Palmyra symbolises the suffering of the Syrian people at the hands of the terrorist group known as Islamic State (IS). Palmyra was a largely Roman city located at a desert oasis on a ...

Recommended for you

NASA's Mars 2020 rover is put to the test

March 20, 2019

In a little more than seven minutes in the early afternoon of Feb. 18, 2021, NASA's Mars 2020 rover will execute about 27,000 actions and calculations as it speeds through the hazardous transition from the edge of space to ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.